Riparian forests along small streams on managed forest land in Sweden

References

• Ahti T, Hämet-Ahti L, Jalas J. 1968. Vegetation zones and their sections in northwestern Europe. Ann Bot Fenn. 5:169–211.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandersson H, Eggertsson Karlström C. 2001. Temperaturen och nederbörden i Sverige 1961–1990: Referensnormaler – utgåva 2 [Temperature and precipitation in Sweden 1961–1990: References – 2nd ed.]. Norrköping (Sweden): Swedish Meteorological and Hydrological Institute (report Meteorologi no. 99).
   Google Scholar
• Baldwin LK, Petersen CL, Bradfield GE, Jones WM, Black ST, Karakatsoulis J. 2012. Bryophyte response to forest canopy treatments within the riparian zone of high-elevation small streams. Can J For Res. 42:141–156. doi: 10.1139/x11-165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton BD, Vose JM, Knoepp JD, Elliott KJ, Reynolds BC, Zarnoch SJ. 2010. Can structural and functional characteristics be used to identify riparian zone width in southern Appalachian headwater catchments? Can J For Res. 40:235–253. doi: 10.1139/X09-182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole E, Newton M. 2013. Influence of streamside buffers on stream temperature response following clear-cut harvesting in western Oregon. Can J For Res. 43:993–1005. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2013-0138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collen P, Keay EJ, Morrison BRS. 2004. Processing of pine (Pinus sylvestris) and birch (Betula pubescens) leaf material in a small river system in the northern Cairngorms, Scotland. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss. 8:567–577. doi: 10.5194/hess-8-567-2004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlström N, Nilsson C. 2006. The dynamics of coarse woody debris in boreal Swedish forests are similar between stream channels and adjacent riparian forests. Can J For Res. 36:1139–1148. doi: 10.1139/x06-015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eggers J, Holmström H, Lämås T, Lind T, Öhman K. 2015. Accounting for a diverse forest ownership structure in projections of forest sustainability indicators. Forests. 6:4001–4033. doi: 10.3390/f6114001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forest Stewardship Council. 2015. FSC® international standard, FSC principles and criteria for forest stewardship. Document reference code FSC-STD-01-001 V5-2 EN.
   Google Scholar
• Fridman J, Holm S, Nilsson M, Nilsson P, Ringvall A, Ståhl G. 2014. Adapting national forest inventories to changing requirements – the case of the Swedish National Forest Inventory at the turn of the 20th century. Silva Fennica. 48(3). doi:10.14214/sf.1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gini C. 1912. Variabilità e mutabilità. Libreria Eredi Virgilio Veschi, Rome. Reprinted in Pizetti E, Salvemini T, editors. (1955). Memorie di metodologica statistica.
   Google Scholar
• Gundersen P, Laurén A, Finér L, Ring E, Koivusalo H, Sætersdal M, Weslien J-O, Sigurdsson BD, Högbom L, Laine J, et al. 2010. Environmental services provided from riparian forests in the Nordic countries. Ambio. 39:555–566. doi: 10.1007/s13280-010-0073-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagan JM, Pealer S, Whitman AA. 2006. Do small headwater streams have a riparian zone defined by plant communities? Can J For Res. 36:2131–2140. doi: 10.1139/x06-114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hägglund B, Lundmark JE. 1981. Handledning i Bonitering med Skogshögskolans boniteringssystem, del 1–3 [Instructions for site quality class assessment according to the site quality class system by the Royal College of Forestry, part 1–3]. Jönköping: National Board of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Hjältén J, Nilsson C, Jørgensen D, Bell D. 2016. Forest–stream links, anthropogenic stressors, and climate change: implications for restoration planning. BioSci. 66:646–654. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylander K. 2004. Living on the edge – effectiveness of buffer strips in protecting biodiversity in boreal riparian forests [dissertation]. Umeå (Sweden): Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Hylander K, Dynesius M. 2006. Causes of the large variation in bryophyte species richness and composition among boreal streamside forests. J Veg Sci. 17:333–346. doi: 10.1111/j.1654-1103.2006.tb02453.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hylander K, Dynesius M, Jonsson BG, Nilsson C. 2005. Substrate form determines the fate of bryophytes in riparian buffer strips. Ecol Appl. 15:674–688. doi: 10.1890/04-0570
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ide J, Finér L, Laurén A, Piirainen S, Launiainen S. 2013. Effects of clear-cutting on annual and seasonal runoff from a boreal forest catchment in eastern Finland. For Ecol Manage. 304:482–491. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janisch JE, Wondzell SM, Ehinger WJ. 2012. Headwater stream temperature: interpreting response after logging, with and without riparian buffers, Washington, USA. For Ecol Manage. 270:302–313. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonsell M, Hansson J, Wedmo L. 2007. Diversity of saproxylic beetle species in logging residues in Sweden – comparisons between tree species and diameters. Biol Conserv. 138:89–99. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kardell L. 2004. Svenskarna och skogen Del 2. Från Baggböleri till naturvård. Jönköping. Skogsstyrelsens förlag. ISBN 91 88462-57-9.
   Google Scholar
• Karrenberg S, Edwards PJ, Kollmann J. 2002. The life history of Salicaceae living in the active zone of floodplains. Freshw Biol. 47:733–748. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00894.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kominoski JS, Marczak LB, Richardson JS. 2011. Riparian forest composition affects stream litter decomposition despite similar microbial and invertebrate communities. Ecol. 92:151–159. doi: 10.1890/10-0028.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreutzweiser DP, Hazlett PW, Gunn JM. 2008. Logging impacts on the biogeochemistry of boreal forest soils and nutrient export to aquatic systems: a review. Environ Rev. 16:157–179. doi: 10.1139/A08-006
   Google Scholar
• Kuglerová L, Ågren A, Jansson R, Laudon H. 2014. Towards optimizing riparian buffer zones: ecological and biogeochemical implications for forest management. For Ecol Manage. 334:74–84. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.08.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuglerová L, Dynesius M, Laudon H, Jansson R. 2016. Relationships between plant assemblages and water flow across a boreal forest landscape: a comparison of liverworts, mosses, and vascular plants. Ecosystems. 19:170–184. doi: 10.1007/s10021-015-9927-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuglerová L, Jansson R, Sponseller RA, Laudon H, Malm-Renöfält B. 2015. Local and regional processes determine plant species richness in a river-network metacommunity. Ecology. 96:381–391. doi: 10.1890/14-0552.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecerf A, Evangelista C, Cucherousset J, Boiché A. 2016. Riparian overstory–understory interactions and their potential implications for forest-stream linkages. For Ecol Manage. 367:112–119. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lexerød NL, Eid T. 2006. An evaluation of different diameter diversity indices based on criteria related to forest management planning. For Ecol Manage. 222:17–28. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005.10.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie MH, Arup U, Grytnes J-A, Ohlson M. 2009. The importance of host tree age, size and growth rate as determinants of epiphytic lichen diversity in boreal spruce forests. Biodivers Conserv. 18:3579–3596. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9661-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind L, Nilsson C, Polvi LE, Weber C. 2014. The role of ice dynamics in shaping vegetation in flowing waters. Biol Rev. 89:791–804. doi: 10.1111/brv.12077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfgren S, Ring E, von Brömssen C, Sørensen R, Högbom L. 2009. Short-term effects of clear-cutting on the water chemistry of two boreal streams in northern Sweden: a paired catchment study. Ambio. 38:347–356. doi: 10.1579/0044-7447-38.7.347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark H, Josefsson T, Östlund L. 2013. The history of clear-cutting in northern Sweden – driving forces and myths in boreal silviculture. For Ecol Manage. 307:112–122. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallik AU, Kreutzweiser DP, Spalvieri CM. 2014. Forest regeneration in gaps seven years after partial harvesting in riparian buffers of boreal mixedwood streams. For Ecol Manage. 312:117–128. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer PM, Reynolds SKJr, McCutchen MD, Canfield TJ. 2007. Meta-analysis of nitrogen removal in riparian buffers. J Environ Qual. 36:1172–1180. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0462
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDermott CL, Cashore B, Kanowski P. 2009. Setting the bar: an international comparison of public and private forest policy specifications and implications for explaining policy trends. J Integr Environ Sci. 6:217–237. doi: 10.1080/19438150903090533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKie BG, Malmqvist B. 2009. Assessing ecosystem functioning in streams affected by forest management: increased leaf decomposition occurs without changes to the composition of benthic assemblages. Freshw Biol. 54:2086–2100. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2008.02150.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore RD, Spittlehouse DL, Story A. 2005. Riparian microclimate and stream temperature response to forest harvesting: a review. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 41:813–834. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.2005.tb04465.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muto EA, Kreutzweiser DP, Sibley PK. 2009. The influence of riparian vegetation on leaf litter inputs to Boreal Shield streams: implications for partial-harvest logging in riparian reserves. Can J For Res. 39:917–927. doi: 10.1139/X09-017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Brown RL, Jansson R, Merritt DM. 2010. The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biol Rev. 85:837–858.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson C, Svedmark M. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of changing water regimes: riparian plant communities. Environ Manage. 30:468–480. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2735-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nitare J, Hallingbäck T. 2005. Signalarter indikatorer på skyddsvärd skog: flora över kryptogamer [Indicator species for forest valuable for conservation: cryptogam flora]. Jönköping (Sweden): Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Olson DH, Anderson PD, Frissell CA, Welsh HHJr, Bradford DF. 2007. Biodiversity management approaches for stream–riparian areas: perspectives for Pacific Northwest headwater forests, microclimates, and amphibians. For Ecol Manage. 246:81–107. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.03.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palviainen M, Finér L, Laurén A, Launiainen S, Piirainen S, Mattsson T, Starr M. 2014. Nitrogen, phosphorus, carbon, and suspended solids loads from forest clear-cutting and site preparation: long-term paired catchment studies from Eastern Finland. Ambio. 43:218–233. doi: 10.1007/s13280-013-0439-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polyakov V, Fares A, Ryder MH. 2005. Precision riparian buffers for the control of nonpoint source pollutant loading into surface water: a review. Environ Rev. 13:129–144. doi: 10.1139/a05-010
   Google Scholar
• Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification Schemes. 2010. Sustainable forest management – requirements. PEFC international standard PEFC ST 1003:2010, requirements for certification schemes.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson JS, Naiman RJ, Bisson PA. 2012. How did fixed-width buffers become standard practice for protecting freshwaters and their riparian areas from forest harvest practices? Freshw Sci. 31:232–238. doi: 10.1899/11-031.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabater S, Butturini A, Clement J-C, Burt T, Dowrick D, Hefting M, Matre V, Pinay G, Postolache C, Rzepecki M, et al. 2003. Nitrogen removal by riparian buffers along a European climatic gradient: patterns and factors of variation. Ecosystems. 6:20–30. doi: 10.1007/s10021-002-0183-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabo JL, Sponseller R, Dixon M, Gade K, Harms T, Heffernan J, Jani A, Katz G, Soykan C, Watts J, et al. 2005. Riparian zones increase regional species richness by harboring different, not more, species. Ecology. 86:56–62. doi: 10.1890/04-0668
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siitonen J. 2001. Forest management, coarse woody debris and saproxylic organisms: Fennoscandian boreal forests as an example. Ecol Bull. 49:11–41.
   Google Scholar
• Sveriges Nationalatlas. 1995. Klimat, sjöar och vattendrag. Höganäs: National Atlas of Sweden. [Climate, lakes and rivers].
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2014. Swedish statistical yearbook of forestry. Jönköping (Sweden): Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2016. Skogsvårdslagstiftningen, Gällande regler 1 januari 2016 [The Forestry Act, regulations valid on 1 January 2016]. Jönköping (Sweden): Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney BW, Newbold JD. 2014. Streamside forest buffer width needed to protect stream water quality, habitat, and organisms: a literature review. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 50:560–584. doi: 10.1111/jawr.12203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson SK. 1992. Sampling. New York (NY): Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Väänänen R, Nieminen M, Vuollekoski M, Nousiainen H, Sallantaus T, Tuittila E-S, Ilvesniemi H. 2008. Retention of phosphorus in peatland buffer zones at six forested catchments in southern Finland. Silva Fennica. 42:211–231. doi: 10.14214/sf.253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace JB, Eggert SL, Meyer JL, Webster JR. 1997. Multiple trophic levels of a forest stream linked to terrestrial litter inputs. Science. 277:102–104. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weibull H, Rydin H. 2005. Bryophyte species richness on boulders: relationship to area, habitat diversity and canopy tree species. Biol Conserv. 122:71–79. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wikström P, Edenius L, Elfving B, Eriksson LO, Lämås T, Sonesson J, Öhman K, Wallerman J, Waller C, Klintebäck F. 2011. The Heureka forestry decision support system: an overview. Math Comput For Nat-Res Sci. 3:87–94.
   Google Scholar