A probability model for root and butt rot in Picea abies derived from Norwegian national forest inventory data

References

• Allison PD. 2014. Measure of fit for logistic regression. SAS Global Forum. Paper 1485-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Belsley DA, Kuh E, Welch RE. 1980. Regression diagnostics: identifying influantial data and sources of collinearity. New York: Wiley; p. xv+292. ISBN: 0-471-05856-4.
   Google Scholar
• Bendz-Hellgren M, Brandtberg P-O, Johansson M, Swedjemark G, Stenlid J. 1999. Growth rate of Heterobasidion annosum in Picea abies established on forest land and arable land. Scand J For Res. 14:402–407. doi: 10.1080/02827589950154104
   Google Scholar
• Bendz-Hellgren M, Stenlid J. 1997. Decreased volume growth of Picea abies in response to Heterobasidion annosum infection. Can J For Res. 27:1519–1524. doi: 10.1139/x97-104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bitterlich W. 1984. The relascope idea: relative measurements in forestry. Slough (Buckinghamshire): Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux; p. 242. ISBN: 0851985394.
   Google Scholar
• Bjørbæk LH. 2016. Root and butt rots in Norway spruce stands at high elevation in eastern Norway [MSc thesis]. Ås: Norwegian University of Life Sciences; p. 53. (In Norwegian with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Brandtberg P-O, Johansson M, Seeger P. 1996. Effects of season and urea treatment on infection of stumps of Picea abies by Heterobasidion annosum in stands on former arable land. Scand J For Res. 11:261–268. doi: 10.1080/02827589609382935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enerstvedt IL, Venn K. 1979. Råte i eldre granskog. En undersøkelse på hogstflater i Øvre Eiker [Decay in mature Picea abies (L.) Karst. Stands. A study on clear-cuttings in Øvre Eiker, Norway]. Rapp Skogforsk. 35:237–264. (In Norwegian with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Garbelotto M, Gonthier P. 2013. Biology, epidemiology, and control of Heterobasidion species worldwide. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 51:39–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geological survey of Norway. 2015a. Bedrock N250;[accessed 2015 Oct 18]. http://www.ngu.no/en/topic/datasets.
   Google Scholar
• Geological survey of Norway. 2015b. Sediments;[accessed 2015 Oct 18]. http://www.ngu.no/en/topic/datasets.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen R, Bryn A, Erikstad L, Lindgaard A. 2015. Natur i Norge –NiN. Versjon 2.0.0. Trondheim (Norway): Artsdatabanken; [accessed 2017 April 4]. http://www.artsdatabanken.no/Pages/3. (In Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• Honkaniemi J, Ojansuu R, Piri T, Kasanen R, Lehtonen M, Salminen H, Kalliokoski T, Mäkinen H. 2014. Hmodel, a Heterobasidion annosum model for even-aged Norway spruce stands. Can J For Res. 44(796e):809.
   Google Scholar
• Honkaniemi J, Piri T, Lehtonen M, Siipilehto J, Heikkinen J, Ojansuu R. 2017. Modelling the mechanisms behind the key epidemiological processes of the conifer pathogen Heterobasidion annosum. Fungal Ecol. 25:29–40. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S, Sturdivant RX. 2013. Applied logistic regression. Third edition Wiley series in probability and statistics. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. ISBN: 978-0-470-58247-3.
   Google Scholar
• Huse KJ. 1983. Forekomst av råte i norsk granskog [Frequency of butt rot in stands of Picea abies (L.) Karst in Norway]. Rapp Nor inst skogforsk. 3:1–39. (In Norwegian with English summary.).
   Google Scholar
• Huse KJ, Solheim H, Venn K. 1994. Råte i gran registrert på stubber etter hogst vinteren 1992 [Stump inventory of root and butt rots in Norway spruce cut in 1992]. Rapp Skogforsk. 23:1–26. (In Norwegian with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Isomäki A, Kallio T. 1974. Consequences of injury caused by timber harvesting machines on the growth and decay of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Acta For Fenn. 136:1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Johansson L. 2000. Rotröta i Sverige enligt Riksskogstaxeringen. En beskrivning och modellering av rötförekomst hos gran, tall och björk [Root rot in Sweden according to the National Forest Inventory. A description and modelling the occurrence of root rot in spruce, pine and birch]. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skoglig ressurshushållning och geomatik. Arbetsrapport 74; p. 70. ISSN 1401-1204. (In Swedish with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Kallio T, Tamminen P. 1974. Decay of spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) in the Åland islands. Acta For Fenn. 138:1–42.
   Google Scholar
• Kangas E. 1952. Maannousemaisenen (Polyporus annosus Fr.) Esiintymisetä, tartunnasta ja tuhoista Suomessa. Referat: Über Auftreten, Infektion und Schäden des Wurzelschwamms (Polyporus annosus Fr.) in Finland. Comm Inst For Fenn. 40:1–34. (In Finnish with German summary).
   Google Scholar
• Larsson JY. 2005. Veiledning i bestemmelse av vegetasjonstyper i skog. Ny utgave 2005. NIJOS håndbok 1; p. 120. ISBN-82-7464-346-1. (In Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• Lindén M, Vollbrecht G. 2002. Sensitivity of Picea abies to butt rot in pure spruce stands and mixed stands with Pinus sylvestris in Sourthern Sweden. Silva Fenn. 36:767–778. doi: 10.14214/sf.519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lussana C, Tveito OE, Uboldi F. 2016. seNorge v2.0: an observational gridded dataset of temperature for Norway. Norwegian Meteorological Institute. Met. Report no. 14. ISSN 2387-4201.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkinen H, Hallaksela AM, Isomäki A. 2007. Increment and decay in Norway spruce and Scots pine after artificial logging damage. Can J For Res. 37:2130–2141. doi: 10.1139/X07-087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila U, Nuutinen T. 2007. Assessing the incidence of butt rot in Norway spruce in southern Finland. Silva Fenn. 41:29–43. doi: 10.14214/sf.473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metslaid M, Granhus A, Scholten J, Fjeld D, Solheim H. 2018. Long-term effects of single-tree selection on the frequency and population structure of root and butt rot in uneven-sized Norway spruce stands. For Ecol Manage. 409:509–517. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2017.11.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möykkynen T, Pukkala T. 2010. Optimizing the management of Norway spruce and Scots pine mixtures on a site infected by Heterobasidion coll. Scand J For Res. 25:127–137. doi: 10.1080/02827581003667322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möykkynen T, Pukkala T. 2011. Effect of planting Scots pine around Norway spruce stumps on the spread of Heterobasidion coll. For Path. 41:212–220. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0329.2010.00673.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva J, Samils N, Johansson U, Bendz-Hellgren M, Stenlid J. 2008. Urea treatment reduced Heterobasidion annosum s.l. root rot in Picea abies after 15 years. For Ecol Manage. 255:2876–2882. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.01.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliva J, Stenlid J. 2011. Validation of the Rotstand model for simulating Heterobasidion annosum rot in Picea abies stands. Fuel and Energy Abstracts. 261:1841–1851.
   Google Scholar
• Oliva J, Thor M, Stenlid J. 2010. Long-term efefcts of mechanized stump treatment against Heterobasidion annosum root rot in Picea abies. Can J For Res. 40:1020–1033. doi: 10.1139/X10-051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piri T, Korhonen K. 2008. The effect of winter thinning on the spread of Heterobasidion parviporum in Norway spruce stands. Can J For Res. 38:2589–2595. doi: 10.1139/X08-103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piri T, Korhonen K, Sairanen A. 1990. Occurrence of Heterobasidion annosum in pure and mixed spruce stands in southern Finland. Scand J For Res. 5:113–125. doi: 10.1080/02827589009382598
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press WH, Flannery BP, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT. 1986. Numerical recipes: the art of scientific computing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 818. ISBN-0-521-3811-9.
   Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Möykkynen T, Thor M, Rönnberg H, Stenlid J. 2005. Modelling infection and spread of Heterobasidion annosum in even-aged Fennoscandian forest stands. Can J For Res. 35:74–84. doi: 10.1139/x04-150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rönnberg J, Berglund M, Johansson U, Cleary M. 2013. Incidence of Heterobasidion spp. following different thinning regimes in Norway spruce in southern Sweden. For Ecol Manage. 289:409–415. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skrondal A, Rabe-Hesketh S. 2009. Prediction in multilevel generalized linear models. J Roy Stat Soc A. 172:659–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2009.00587.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solheim H. 2006. White rot fungi in living Norway spruce trees at high elevation in southern Norway with notes on gross characteristics of the rot. In: Solheim H, Hietala AM, editors. Forest pathology research in the Nordic and Baltic countries 2005 Proc. SNS-meeting on Forest Pathology, Biri, Norway, 28–31. August 2005. Aktuelt fra Skogforskningen 1/06. p. 5–12.
   Google Scholar
• Stamnes VAG, Solberg S, Solheim H. 2000. En analyse av råtefrekvens i eldre granskog, ut fra skoglige, klimatiske og edafiske faktorer. Rapp Skogforsk. 17:1–16. (In Norwegian).
   Google Scholar
• Stenlid J, Redfern DB. 1998. Spread within the tree and stand. In: Woodward S, Stenlid J, Karjalainen R, Hütterman A, editor. Heterobasion annosum: biology, ecology, impact and control. Wallingford (UK): CABI; p. 125–141. ISBN: 0-85199-275-7.
   Google Scholar
• Stenlid J, Wästerlund I. 1986. Estimating the frequency of stem rot in Picea abies using an increment borer. Scand J For Res. 1:303–308. doi: 10.1080/02827588609382421
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stukel TA. 1988. Generalized logistic models. J Am Stat Assoc. 83:426–431. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedjemark G, Stenlid J. 1993. Population dynamics of the root rot fungus Heterobasidion annosum following thinning of Picea abies. Oikos. 66:247–254. doi: 10.2307/3544811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamminen P. 1985. Butt-rot in Norway spruce in southern Finland. Commun Inst For Fenn. 127:1–52.
   Google Scholar
• Thor M, Arlinger JD, Stenlid J. 2006. Heterobasidion annosum root rot in Picea abies: Modelling economic outcomes of stump treatment in Scandinavian coniferous forests. Scand J For Res. 21:414–423. doi: 10.1080/02827580600917338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thor M, Ståhl G, Stenlid J. 2005. Modelling root rot incidence in Sweden using tree, site and stand variables. Scand J For Res. 20:165–176. doi: 10.1080/02827580510008347
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomter SM, Hylen G, Nilsen JE. 2010. Norway country report. In: Tomppo E, Gschwantner T, Lawrence M, McRoberts RE, editor. National forest inventories: pathways for common reporting. Dordrecht: Springer; p. 411–424. ISBN 0-8039-7374-8.
   Google Scholar
• Tveite B. 1977. Bonitetskurver for gran. Site-index curves for Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst). Medd Nor inst skogforsk. 33:1–84. (In Norwegian with English summary).
   Google Scholar
• Vestjordet E. 1967. Funksjoner og tabeller for kubering av stående gran [Functions and tables for volume of standing trees. Norway spruce]. Meddr norske SkogforsVes. 22:539–574.
   Google Scholar
• Vollbrecht G, Agestam E. 1995. Modelling incidence of root rot in Picea abies plantations in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 10:74–81. doi: 10.1080/02827589509382870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodward S, Stenlid J, Karjalainen R, Hüttermann A. 1998. Heterobasidion annosum: biology, ecology, impact and control. Wallingford (UK): CABI; p. 589. ISBN: 0-85199-275-7.
   Google Scholar
• Wooldridge JM. 2010. Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. 2nd ed. The MIT Press; p. 735. ISBN 978-0-262-23258-6.
   Google Scholar
• Žemaitis P, Stakėnas V. 2016. Ecological factors influencing frequency of Norway spruce butt rot in mature stands in Lithuania. Russ J Ecol. 47:355–363. doi: 10.1134/S1067413616040172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar