304
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Large scale biotic damage impacts on forest ecosystem services

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 741-755 | Received 15 Mar 2018, Accepted 24 Jun 2018, Published online: 09 Jul 2018

References

  • Abbott B, Stennes B, van Kooten GC. 2008. An economic analysis of mountain pine beetle impacts in a global context. (BC): University of Victoria. REPA working paper 2008-02; p. 25.
  • Alfaro RI, Campbell E, Hawkes BC. 2010. Historical frequency, intensity and extent of mountain pine beetle disturbance in British Columbia. Victoria (BC): Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre. MPB Working Paper 2009-30; p. 52.
  • Alila Y, Bewley D, Kuraś P, Marren P, Hassan M, Luo C, Blair T. 2009. Effects of pine beetle infestations and treatments on hydrology and geomorphology: integrating stand-level data and knowledge into mesoscale watershed functions. Mountain Pine Beetle Working Paper 2009-06; [accessed 2017 Apr 22] http://www.cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/31182.pdf.
  • Alila Y, Chatwin S, Luo C. 2007. An application of the DHSVM model to estimating the impact of mountain pine beetle attack and salvage harvesting on stream flows. In: Redding T., editor. Mountain pine beetle and watershed hydrology workshop: preliminary results of research from BC, Alberta and Colorado. Kelowna (BC): the Okanagan Basin Water Board; p. 45–46.
  • Amman GD, McGregor MD, Cahill DB, Klein WH. 1977. Guidelines for reducing losses of lodgepole pine to the mountain pine beetle in unmanaged stands in the Rocky Mountains. Ogden (UT): USDA Forest Service. General Technical Report INT-36; p. 19.
  • Amoroso MM, Coates KD, Astrup R. 2013. Stand recovery and self-organization following large-scale mountain pine beetle induced canopy mortality in northern forests. For Ecol Manage. 310:300–311. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.037.
  • Anderson B, Armsworth P, Eigenbrod F, Thomas C, Gillings S, Heinemeyer A, Roy D, Gaston K. 2009. Spatial covariance between biodiversity and other ecosystem service priorities. J Appl Ecol. 46(4):888–896. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01666.x
  • Arora VK, Peng Y, Kurz WA, Fyfe JC, Hawkins B, Werner AT. 2016. Potential near-future carbon uptake overcomes losses from a large insect outbreak in British Columbia, Canada. Geophys Res Lett. 43:2590–2598. doi:10.1002/2015GL067532.
  • Balvanera P, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Ricketts TH, Bailey SA, Kark S, Kremen C, Pereira H. 2001. Conserving biodiversity and ecosystem services. Science. 291(5511):2047–2047. doi: 10.1126/science.291.5511.2047
  • BC Ministry of Environment. 2008. BC parks year end report 2007/08. Statistic Report; [accessed 2017 Aug 16] http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/research/year_end_report/year_end_rep_2008.pdf.
  • BC Ministry of Environment. 2013. BC parks year end report 2012/13. Statistic Report; [accessed 2017 Jun 26] http://www.env.gov.bc.ca/bcparks/research/statistic_report/statistic_report_2013.pdf.
  • BC Ministry of Forests, Mines Lands. 2010. The state of British Columbia’s forests. Third Edition. Victoria (BC); [accessed 2017 Jun 22]. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/sof/2010/SOF_2010_Web.pdf.
  • Brown S, Schreier H. 2009. Water quantity and quality related to rates of pine beetle infestation and salvage logging: a regional comparison. Water quality technical report, MPB Project #7.31; p. 24.
  • Caldwell MK. 2012. Impacts of mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus Ponderosae) and fire disturbances on forest ecosystem carbon dynamics and species composition [MSc Thesis]. University of Colorado.
  • Cheng JD. 1989. Streamflow changes after clear-cut logging of a pine beetle-infested watershed in southern British Columbia, Canada. Water Resour Res. 25:449–456. doi: 10.1029/WR025i003p00449
  • Clow DW, Rhoades C, Briggs J, Caldwell M, Lewis WM. 2011. Responses of soil and water chemistry to mountain pine beetle induced tree mortality in grand county, Colorado, USA. Appl Geochem. 26:S174–S178. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.096
  • Coates KD, DeLong C, Burton PJ, Sachs DL. 2006. Abundance of secondary structure in lodgepole pine stands affected by the mountain pine beetle. Report of Chief Forester; [accessed 2017 Jul 18]. http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/mountain_pine_beetle/stewardship/report.pdf.
  • Coates KD, Glover T, Henderson B. 2009. Abundance of secondary structure in lodgepole pine stands affected by the mountain pine beetle in the Cariboo-Chilcotin. Victoria (BC): Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre. Mountain pine beetle working paper 2009–20; p. 37.
  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Faber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, et al. 1997. The value of the world’s ecosystems and natural capital. Nature. 387:253–260. doi: 10.1038/387253a0
  • Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK. 2014. Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change. 26:152–158. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002.
  • Daily GC, Matson PA. 2008. Ecosystem services: from theory to implementation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105(28):9455–9456. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804960105
  • Daily GC, Polasky S, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, Mooney HA, Pejchar L, Ricketts TH, Salzman J, Shallenberger R. 2009. Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver. Front Ecol Environ. 7(1):21–28. doi: 10.1890/080025
  • Dhar A, Balliet NA, Runzer KD, Hawkins CDB. 2015b. Impact of a mountain pine beetle outbreak on young lodgepole pine stands in central British Columbia. Forests. 6:3483–3500. doi:10.3390/f6103483.
  • Dhar A, Coates KD, Rogers B, Hardy K. 2013. Impact of mountain pine beetle on mid-term timber supply in sub boreal spruce zone of British Columbia. 16th international boreal forest research association (IBFRA); Oct 7–10; Edmonton (AB); Comeau PG, edition; p. 28.
  • Dhar A, Hawkins CDB. 2011. Regeneration and growth following mountain pine beetle attack: a synthesis of knowledge. J Ecosyst Manage. 12:1–16.
  • Dhar A, Parrott L, Hawkins CD. 2016a. Aftermath of mountain pine beetle outbreak in British Columbia: stand dynamics, management response and ecosystem resilience. Forests. 7(8):171. doi: 10.3390/f7080171
  • Dhar A, Parrott L, Heckbert S. 2015a. Mapping the impact of mountain pine beetle outbreaks on forest ecosystem services in British Columbia, Canada. Proceedings of the IUFRO landscape ecology conference sustaining ecosystem services in forest landscapes concepts, research, and applications; Aug 23–30; Tartu; [accessed 2017 Sep 18]. http://iufrole2015.to.ee/download/m55d4ea9be5748#iufrole_2015_abstracts_pdf.
  • Dhar A, Parrott L, Heckbert S. 2016b. Consequences of mountain pine beetle outbreak on forest ecosystem services in western Canada. Can J For Res. 46(8):987–999. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2016-0137
  • Diaz S, Tilman D, Fargione J. 2005. Biodiversity regulation of ecosystem services. In: Hassan R., Scholes R., Ash N., editor. Ecosystem and human well-being: current state and trends. Wishington (DC): Island Press; p. 297–329.
  • The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). 2010. Mainstreaming the economics of nature: a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. London: Earthscan. p. 39.
  • Egoh B, Reyers B, Rouget M, Richardson DM, Le Maitre DC, Van Jaarsveld AS. 2008. Mapping ecosystem services for planning and management. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 127(1–2):135–140. doi: 10.1016/j.agee.2008.03.013
  • Environment Canada. 2012. National inventory report, 1990–2010: greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada; [accessed 2017 Apr 12]. http://www.ec.gc.ca/publications/A91164E0-7CEB-4D61-841C-BEA8BAA223F9/Executive-Summary-2012_WEB-v3.pdf.
  • Forest Practices Board (FPB). 2007. The effect of mountain pine beetle attack and salvage harvesting on streamflows; Special investigation. Victoria (BC): BC Ministry of Forest; p. 29; [accessed 2017 Jul 18]. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfd/library/documents/bib106689.pdf.
  • Griesbauer H, Green S. 2006. Examining the utility of advance regeneration for reforestation and timber production in unsalvaged stands killed by the mountain pine beetle: controlling factors and management implications. J Ecosyste Manage. 7(2):81–92.
  • Hansen EM, Amacher CM, Miegroet HV, Long JN, Ryan MG. 2015. Carbon dynamics in central US rockies lodgepole pine type after mountain pine beetle outbreaks. For Sci. 61:665–679. doi:10.5849/forsci.14-094.
  • Hawkins CDB, Dhar A, Balliet N. 2013a. Radial growth of residual overstory trees and understory saplings after mountain pine beetle attack in central British Columbia. For Ecol Manage. 310:348–356. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.035.
  • Hawkins CDB, Dhar A, Balliet NA, Runzer KD. 2012. Residual mature trees and secondary stand structure after mountain pine beetle attack in central British Columbia. For Ecol Manage. 277:107–115. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.04.023.
  • Hawkins CDB, Dhar A, Lange J. 2013b. Vegetation management with glyphosate has little impact on understory species diversity or tree growth in a sub boreal spruce plantation – a case study. Plant Biosyst. 147:105–114. doi:10.1080/11263504.2012.736421.
  • Hayha T, Franzese PP, Paletto A, Fath BD. 2015. Assessing, valuing and mapping ecosystem services in Alpine forests. Ecosyst Serv. 14:12–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.03.001
  • Hélie JF, Peters DL, Tattrie KR, Gibson JJ. 2005. Review and synthesis of potential hydrologic impacts of mountain pine beetle and related harvesting activities in British Columbia. Mountain pine beetle initiative working paper 2005–23. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service; [accessed 2017 Oct 30]. http://cfs.nrcan.gc.ca/pubwarehouse/pdfs/25684.pdf.
  • Hicke JA, Allen CD, Desai A, Dietze MC, Hall RJ, Hogg EH, Kashian DM, Moore D, Raffa KF, Sturrock RN, et al. 2012. Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada. Global Change Biol. 18:7–34. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02543.x.
  • Huggard D. 2008. Effects of salvage options for beetle-killed pine stands on ECA: December 2008 update. Prepared for BC Ministry of Environment. Victoria (BC). Unpublished technical report.
  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2006. Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories; [accessed 2017 Jul 12]. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/0_Overview/V0_1_Overview.pdf.
  • Kivari A, Xu W, Otukol S. 2011. Volume to biomass conversion for British Columbia forests. Forest Analysis and Inventory Branch, Ministry of Forests and Range; [accessed 2017 Sep 21]. https://www.for.gov.bc.ca/hts/vridata/standards/news/volume_to_biomass_conversion_report.pdf.
  • Kovacic DA, Dyer MI, Cringan AT. 1985. Understory biomass in ponderosa pine following mountain pine beetle infestation. For Ecol Manage. 13:53–67. doi:10.1016/0378-1127(85)90005-2.
  • Kurz WA, Dymond CC, Stinson G, Rampley GJ, Neilson ET, Carroll AL, Ebata T, Safranyik L. 2008. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature. 452:987–990. doi: 10.1038/nature06777
  • Landry JS, Parrott L, Price DT, Ramankutty N, Matthews HD. 2016. Modelling long-term impacts of mountain pine beetle outbreaks on merchantable biomass, ecosystem carbon, albedo, and radiative forcing. Biogeosciences. 13:5277–5295. doi:10.5194/bg-13-5277-2016.
  • Mann A, Tam C, Higgins C, Rodrigues L. 2007. The association between drinking water turbidity and gastrointestinal illness: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 7:219. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-7-256.
  • Martínez-Harms MA, Balvanera P. 2012. Methods for mapping ecosystem service supply: a review. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manage. 8(1-2):17–25. doi:10.1080/21513732.2012.663792.
  • McKenney DW, Hutchinson MF, Papadopol P, Lawrence K, Pedlar J, Campbell K, Milewska E, Hopkinson RF, Price D, Owen T. 2011. Customized spatial climate models for North America. Sault Ste. Marie, ON: Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service. doi:10.1175/BAMS -D-10-3132.1.
  • Michael M, Cluny S, Carossa W. 2011. Post-mountain pine beetle recreational usage survey, mid-term timber supply. Report appendix 8. p. 80.
  • Mikkelson K, Bearup LA, Maxwell RM, Stednick JD, McCray JE, Sharp JO. 2013b. Bark beetle infestation impacts on nutrient cycling, water quality and interdependent hydrological effects. Biogeochemistry. 115:1–21. doi:10.1007/s10533-013-9875-8.
  • Mikkelson KM, Maxwell RM, Ferguson I, Stednick JD, McCray JE, Sharp JO. 2013a. Mountain pine beetle infestation impacts: modeling water and energy budgets at the hill-slope scale. Ecohydrol. 6:64–72. doi:10.1002/eco.278.
  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being. Washington (DC): Synthesis Island Press.
  • Morris JL, Cottrell S, Fettig CJ, Hansen WD, Sherriff RL, Carter VA, Clear JL, Clement J, DeRose RJ, Hicke JA, et al. 2016. Managing bark beetle impacts on ecosystems and society: priority questions to motivate future research. J Appl Ecol. 54:750–760. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12782.
  • Morris JL, le Roux PC, Macharia AN, Brunelle A, Hebertson EG, Lundeen ZJ. 2013. Organic, elemental, and geochemical contributions to lake sedimentdeposits during severe spruce beetle (Dendroctonus rufipennis) disturbances. For Ecol Manag. 289:78–89. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.004.
  • Naidoo R, Balmford A, Costanza R, Fisher B, Green RE, Lehner B, Malcolm TR, Ricketts TH. 2008. Global mapping of ecosystem services and conservation priorities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105(28):9495–9500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707823105
  • Nelson E, Mendoza G, Regetz J, Polasky S, Tallis H, Cameron R, Chan KM, Daily GC, Goldstein J, Kareiva PM, et al. 2009. Modeling multiple ecosystem services, biodiversity conservation, commodity production, and tradeoffs at landscape scales. Front Ecol Environ. 7(1):4–11. doi: 10.1890/080023
  • Paquette A, Messier C. 2011. The effect of biodiversity on tree productivity: from temperate to boreal forests. Glob Ecol Biogeogr. 20:170–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2010.00592.x
  • Pec GJ, Karst J, Sywenky AN, Cigan PW, Erbilgin N, Simard SW, Cahill JF. 2015. Rapid increases in forest understory diversity and productivity following a mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) outbreak in pine forests. PLoS ONE. 10(4):e0124691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124691.
  • Perovich P, Sibold JS. 2016. Forest composition change after a mountain pine beetle outbreak, rocky mountain national park, CO, USA. For Eco Manage. 366:184–192. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.02.010.
  • Potts DF. 1984. Hydrologic impact of a large scale mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonous ponderosae Hopkins) epidemic. Water Resources Bull. 20:373–377. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-1688.1984.tb04719.x
  • Primmer E, Furman E. 2012. Operationalising ecosystem service approaches for governance: do measuring, mapping and valuing integrate sector-specific knowledge systems? Ecosyst Serv. 1:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.008
  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 107(11):5242–5247. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0907284107
  • Rhoades CC, McCutchan JH, Cooper LA, Clow D, Detmer TM, Briggs JS, Stednick JD, Veblen TT, Ertz RM, Likens GE. 2013. Biogeochemistry of beetle-killed forests: explaining a weak nitrate response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 110:1756–1760. doi:10.1073/pnas.1221029110.
  • Roe AL, Amman GD. 1970. The mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests. Ogden (UT): U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station. Research Paper INT-71.
  • Schägner JP, Brander L, Maes J, Hartje V. 2013. Mapping ecosystem services’ values: current practice and future prospects. Ecosyst Serv. 4:33–46. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.003.
  • Schowalter TD. 2012. Insect herbivore effects on forest ecosystem services. J Sustainable For. 3:518–536.
  • Shore LT, Safranyik L, Hawkes CB, Taylor WS. 2006. Effects of the mountain pine beetle on lodgepole pine stand structure and dynamics. In: Safranyik L, Wilson B, editor. The mountain pine beetle: a synthesis of biology, management, and impacts on lodgepole pine. Victoria (BC): Natural Resources Canada; p. 95–116.
  • Simard SW, Hagerman SM, Sachs DL, Heineman JL, Mather WJ. 2005. Conifer growth, Armillaria ostoyae root disease and plant diversity responses to broadleaf competition reduction in temperate mixed forests of southern interior British Columbia. Can J For Res. 35:843–859. doi: 10.1139/x05-010
  • Stednick J. 2007. Preliminary assessment of water quantity and water quality changes in beetle-killed catchments in north-central Colorado. In: Redding T., editor. Mountain pine beetle and watershed hydrology workshop: preliminary results from BC, Alberta and Colorado. Kelowna, BC: FORREX, Kamloops; p. 27–28.
  • Stone WE, Wolfe ML. 1996. Response of understorey vegetation to variable tree mortality following a mountain pine beetle epidemic in lodgepole pine stands in northern Utah. Vegetatio. 122:1–12. doi:10.1007/BF00052811.
  • Tallis H, Kareiva P, Marvier M, Chang A. 2008. An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 105:9457–9464. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705797105
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). 2013. Estimation of carbon stocks and change in carbon stocks in dead wood and litter in A/R CDM project activities. Version 03.0; [accessed 2017 Aug 16] https://cdm.unfccc.int/methodologies/ARmethodologies/tools/ar-am-tool-12-v3.0.pdf.
  • Wolff S, Schulp CJE, Verburg PH. 2015. Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol Indic. 55:159–171. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016
  • Wong C. 2008. Environmental impacts of mountain pine beetle in the southern interior, British Columbia. Prince George (BC): Ministry of Environmen. [accessed 2017 May 31]. http://www.sibacs.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/environmental-impacts-report-final.pdf.
  • Zhang M, Wei X. 2012. The effects of cumulative forest disturbance on streamflow in a large watershed in the central interior of British Columbia, canada. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci. 16:2021–2034. doi: 10.5194/hess-16-2021-2012

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.