Mixed forests to mitigate risk of insect outbreaks

References

• Andersson P, Lofstedt C, Hamback PA. 2013. Insect density-plant density relationships: a modified view of insect responses to resource concentrations. Oecologia. 173:1333–1344. doi: 10.1007/s00442-013-2737-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa P, Hines J, Kaplan I, Martinson H, Szczepaniec A, Szendrei Z. 2009. Associational resistance and associational susceptibility: having right or wrong neighbors. Ann Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 40:1–20. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellone D, Klapwijk MJ, Björkman C. 2017. Habitat heterogeneity affects predation of European pine sawfly cocoons. Ecol Evol. 7:11011–11020. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezemer TM, Harvey JA, Kamp AFD, et al. 2010. Behaviour of male and female parasitoids in the field: influence of patch size, host density, and habitat complexity. Ecol Entomol. 35:341–351. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2010.01184.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkman C, Bylund H, Nilsson U, Nordlander G, Schroeder M. 2015. Forest management to mitigate insect damage in a changing climate: possibilities and uncertainties. In: Björkman C, Niemelä P, editors. Climate change and insect pests. Wallingford: CABI; p. 248–266.
   Google Scholar
• Castagneyrol B, Giffard B, Pere C, Jactel H. 2013. Plant apparency, an overlooked driver of associational resistance to insect herbivory. J Ecol. 101:418–429. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagneyrol B, Jactel H, Vacher C, Brockerhoff EG, Koricheva J. 2014. Effects of plant phylogenetic diversity on herbivory depend on herbivore specialization. J Appl Ecol. 51:134–141. doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.12175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley MJ. 2012. The R book. Chicester: John Wiley & Sons. Ltd. doi: 10.1002/9781118448908
   Google Scholar
• Crowder DW, Jabbour R. 2014. Relationships between biodiversity and biological control in agroecosystems: current status and future challenges. Biol Control. 75:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doak P, Wagner D. 2015. The role of interference competition in a sustained population outbreak of the aspen leaf miner in Alaska. Basic Appl Ecol. 16:434–442. doi: 10.1016/j.baae.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dulaurent AM, Porté AJ, Van Halder I, Vetillard F, Menassieu P, Jactel H. 2012. Hide and seek in forests: colonization by the pine processionary moth is impeded by the presence of nonhost trees. Agric For Entomol. 14:19–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2011.00549.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton A, Nilsson U, Sonesson J, et al. 2016. Replacing monocultures with mixed-species stands: ecosystem service implications of two production forest alternatives in Sweden. Ambio. 45:124–139. doi: 10.1007/s13280-015-0749-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser SEM, Dytham C, Mayhew PJ. 2007. Determinants of parasitoid abundance and diversity in woodland habitats. J Appl Ecol. 44:352–361. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gols R, Bukovinszky T, Hemerik L, Harvey JA, Van Lenteren JC, Vet LEM. 2005. Reduced foraging efficiency of a parasitoid under habitat complexity: implications for population stability and species coexistence. J Anim Ecol. 74:1059–1068. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2005.01003.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths KJ. 1975. The biology of Lophyroplectus luteator (Hym.: Ichneumonidae) on Neodiprion sertifer (Hym.: Diprionidae) in Ontario. Entomophaga. 20:97–103. doi: 10.1007/BF02373455
   Google Scholar
• Gur’yanova T. 2006. Fecundity of the European pine sawfly Neodiprion sertifer (Hymenoptera, Diprionidae) related to cyclic outbreaks: invariance effects. Entomol Rev. 86:910–921. doi: 10.1134/S0013873806080069
   Google Scholar
• Hamback PA, Inouye BD, Andersson P, Underwood N. 2014. Effects of plant neighborhoods on plant-herbivore interactions: resource dilution and associational effects. Ecology. 95:1370–1383. doi: 10.1890/13-0793.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I. 1987. Pine sawfly population-dynamics – patterns, processes, problems. Oikos. 50:327–335. doi: 10.2307/3565493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski I, Parviainen P. 1985. Cocoon predation by small mammals, and pine sawfly population-dynamics. Oikos. 45:125–136. doi: 10.2307/3565230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassell MP, Southwood TRE. 1978. Foraging strategies of insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 9:75–98. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.09.110178.000451
   Google Scholar
• Jactel H, Bauhus J, Boberg J, et al. 2017. Tree diversity drives forest stand resistance to natural disturbances. Curr For Rep. 3:223–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jactel H, Birgersson G, Andersson S, Schlyter F. 2011. Non-host volatiles mediate associational resistance to the pine processionary moth. Oecologia. 166:703–711. doi: 10.1007/s00442-011-1918-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG. 2007. Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett. 10:835–848. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jactel H, Brockerhoff E, Duelli P. 2005. A test of the biodiversity-stability theory: meta-analysis of tree species diversity effects on insect pest infestations, and re-examination of responsible factors. In: Scherer-Lorenzen M, Korner C, Schulze ED, editors. Forest diversity and function: temperate and boreal systems. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; p. 235–262.
   Google Scholar
• Kaitaniemi P, Riihimaki J, Koricheva J, Vehvilainen H. 2007. Experimental evidence for associational resistance against the European pine sawfly in mixed tree stands. Silva Fenn. 41:259–268. doi: 10.14214/sf.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp WP, Simmons GA. 1978. The influence of stand factors on parasitism of spruce budworm eggs by Trichogramma minutum. Environ Entomol. 7:685–688. doi: 10.1093/ee/7.5.685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapwijk MJ, Bylund H, Schroeder M, Björkman C. 2016. Forest management and natural biocontrol of insect pests. Forestry. 89:253–262. doi: 10.1093/forestry/cpw019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapwijk MJ, Lewis OT. 2014. Spatial ecology of host–parasitoid interactions: a threatened butterfly and its specialised parasitoid. J Insect Conserv. 18:437–445. doi: 10.1007/s10841-014-9653-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollberg I, Bylund H, Huitu O, Björkman C. 2014. Regulation of forest defoliating insects through small mammal predation: reconsidering the mechanisms. Oecologia. 176:975–983. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3080-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kouki J, Lyytikainen-Saarenmaa P, Henttonen H, Niemelä P. 1998. Cocoon predation on diprionid sawflies: the effect of forest fertility. Oecologia. 116:482–488. doi: 10.1007/s004420050613
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krebs J. 1977. Optimal foraging – theory and experiment. Nature. 268:583–584. doi: 10.1038/268583a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masumoto T, Sunahara T, Suzuki N. 2000. Effects of nonhost and host plants on insect herbivory covarying with plant size in the cruciferous plant Turritis glabra. Popul Ecol. 42:145–152. doi: 10.1007/PL00011993
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon AE, Roland J. 2012. Generalist predation on forest tent caterpillar varies with forest stand composition: an experimental study across multiple life stages. Ecol Entomol. 37:13–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2011.01330.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson E. 1987. Mortality factors in a population of Neodiprion sertifer (Hymenoptera. Diprionidae). Oikos. 48:297–303. doi: 10.2307/3565517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson E. 1989a. Transmission agents of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus of Neodiprion sertifer (Hym, Dirpionidae). Entomophaga. 34:373–380. doi: 10.1007/BF02372476
   Google Scholar
• Olofsson E. 1989b. Transmission of the nuclear polyhedrosis virus of the European pine sawfly from adult to offspring. J Invertebr Pathol. 54:322–330. doi: 10.1016/0022-2011(89)90116-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olofsson E. 1992. Predation by Formica polycenia Forster (Hym, formicidae) on newly emerged larvae of Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffroy) (Hym, Diprionidae). J Appl Entomol. 114:315–319. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.1992.tb01132.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pimentel D. 1961. Species diversity and insect population outbreaks. Ann Entomol Soc Am. 54:76–86. doi: 10.1093/aesa/54.1.76
   Google Scholar
• Pschorn-Walcher H. 1965. The ecology of Neodiprion sertifer (Geoffr.) (Hymenoptera: Diprionidae) and a review of its parasite complex in Europe. Commonwealth Inst Biol Contr Tech Bull. 5:33–97.
   Google Scholar
• Pschorn-Walcher H. 1967. Biology of the Ichneumonid parasites of Neodiprion sertifer in Europe. Commonwealth Inst Biol Contr Tech Bull. 8:7–51.
   Google Scholar
• Pschorn-Walcher H. 1987. Interspecific competition between the principal larval parasitoids of the pine sawfly, Neodiprion sertifer (Geoff.) (Hym.: Diprionidae). Oecologia. 73:621–625. doi: 10.1007/BF00379426
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riihimäki J, Kaitaniemi P, Koricheva J, Vehviläinen H. 2005. Testing the enemies hypothesis in forest stands: the important role of tree species composition. Oecologia. 142:90–97. doi: 10.1007/s00442-004-1696-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Root RD. 1973. Organization of a plant-arthropod association in simple and divers habitat - fauna of collards (Brassica oleracea). Ecol Monogr. 43:95–124. doi: 10.2307/1942161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuler LJ, Bugmann H, Snell RS. 2017. From monocultures to mixed-species forests: is tree diversity key for providing ecosystem services at the landscape scale? Landscape Ecol. 32:1499–1516. doi: 10.1007/s10980-016-0422-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stiling P, Rossi AM, Cattell MV. 2003. Associational resistance mediated by natural enemies. Ecol Entomol. 28:587–592. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2311.2003.00546.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvanainen JO, Root RB. 1972. The influence of vegetational diversity on the population ecology of a specialized herbivore, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Oecologia. 10:321–346. doi: 10.1007/BF00345736
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toumey J, Korstian C. 1947. Foundations of silviculture upon an ecological basis. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Underwood N. 2004. Variance and skew of the distribution of plant quality influence herbivore population dynamics. Ecology. 85:686–693. doi: 10.1890/03-0030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood N, Inouye BD, Hamback PA. 2014. A conceptual framework for associational effects: when do neighbours matter and how would we know? Q Rev Biol. 89:1–19. doi: 10.1086/674991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables WN, Ripley BD. 2002. Modern applied statistics with S. New York: Springer Science & Business Media. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2
   Google Scholar
• Vinson S. 1976. Host selection by insect parasitoids. Annu Rev Entomol. 21:109–133. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.21.010176.000545
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar