1,748
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Estimation of genetic parameters, provenance performances, and genotype by environment interactions for growth and stiffness in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta)

, , &
Pages 1-11 | Received 27 Mar 2018, Accepted 21 Oct 2018, Published online: 08 Nov 2018

References

  • Andersson E. 1987. Pinus contorta – Hållfasthet [Pinus contorta – strength]. Uppsala: Department of Forest Production, Swedish University of Agricultural Science. Report No. 185; 44 p. Swedish with English summary.
  • Baltunis BS, Gapare WJ, Wu HX. 2010. Genetic parameters and genotype by environment interaction in radiata pine for growth and wood quality traits in Australia. Silvae Genet. 59(2–3):113–124. doi: 10.1515/sg-2010-0014
  • Bridgwater FE, Stonecypher RW. 1978. Genotype × environment interaction: implications in tree breeding programs. In: Hollis CA, Squillace AE, editors. 1978. Proceedings of Fifth North American Forest Biology Workshop; 13–15 Mar. Gainesville: University of Florida; p. 46–61.
  • Bucur V. 2006. Acoustics of wood, 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer. 393 p.
  • Burdon RD. 1977. Genetic correlation as a concept for studying genotype-environment interaction in forest tree breeding. Silvae Genet. 26(5–6):168–175.
  • Chen Z-Q, Gil MRG, Karlsson B, Lundqvist S-O, Olsson L, Wu HX. 2014. Inheritance of growth and solid wood quality traits in a large Norway spruce population tested at two locations in southern Sweden. Tree Genet Genomes. 10(5):1291–1303. doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0761-x
  • Chen Z-Q, Karlsson B, Lundqvist S-O, Gil MRG, Olsson L, Wu HX. 2015. Estimating solid wood properties using Pilodyn and acoustic velocity on standing trees of Norway spruce. Ann For Sci. 72(4):499–508. doi: 10.1007/s13595-015-0458-9
  • Chen Z-Q, Karlsson B, Wu HX. 2017. Patterns of additive genotype-by-environment interaction in tree height of Norway spruce in southern and central Sweden. Tree Genet Genomes. 13(1):25. doi: 10.1007/s11295-017-1103-6
  • Critchfield WB. 1980. The genetics of lodgepole pine. Washington (DC): USDA Forest Service. Res. Pap. WO-37; 57 p.
  • Danell Ö, Eriksson T, Rosvall O. 1993. Currently suggested plans for long-term breeding of lodgepole pine and other conifers in Sweden. In: Lindgren D, editor. Pinus contorta – from untamed forest to domesticated crop. Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO WP 2.02.06 and Frans Kempe Symposium. 1992 Aug 24–28; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Report 11; p. 271–278.
  • Elfving B, Ericsson T, Rosvall O. 2001. The introduction of lodgepole pine for wood production in Sweden – a review. For Ecol Manage. 141(1–2):15–29. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00485-0
  • Elfving B, Norgren O. 1993. Volume yield superiority of lodgepole pine compared to Scots pine in Sweden. In: Lindgren D, editor. Pinus contorta – from untamed forest to domesticated crop. Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO WP 2.02.06 and Frans Kempe Symposium; 1992 Aug 24–28; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Report 11; p. 69–80.
  • Ericsson T. 1993. Provenance qualities of the Pinus contorta breeding base in Sweden. Uppsala: SkogForsk ─ Forestry Research Institute of Sweden. Report 4; 33 p.
  • Ericsson T. 1994. Lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta var. latifolia) breeding in Sweden – results and prospects based on early evaluations [dissertation]. Umeå: Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Science; 32 p.
  • Ericsson T, Danell Ö, Andersson B. 1994. Genetic variation of Pinus contorta var. latifolia breeding material in Sweden. Can J For Res. 24(4):723–729. doi: 10.1139/x94-096
  • Falconer D, Mackay T. 1989. Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th ed. New York (NY): Longman.
  • Fries A. 1986. Volume growth and wood density of plus tree progenies of Pinus contorta in two Swedish field trials. Scand J For Res. 1(1–4):403–419. doi: 10.1080/02827588609382433
  • Fries A, Elfving B, Ukrainetz NK. 2017. Growth and survival of lodgepole pine and Scots pine after 25 years in a reciprocal transplant experiment in Canada and Sweden. Scand J For Res. 32(4):287–296. doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1221990
  • Fries A, Lindgren D. 1986. Performance of plus tree progenies of Pinus contorta originating north of latitude 55° N in a Swedish trial at 64° N. Can J For Res. 16(3):427–437. doi: 10.1139/x86-079
  • Gapare WJ, Ivković M, Baltunis BS, Matheson CA, Wu HX. 2010. Genetic stability of wood density and diameter in Pinus radiata D. Don plantation estate across Australia. Tree Genet Genomes. 6(1):113–125. doi: 10.1007/s11295-009-0233-x
  • Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R. 2009. ASReml user guide release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International.
  • Hagner S. 1971. Cultivation of Pinus contorta in northern Sweden. Swedish For Assoc J. 3:219–246.
  • Hagner S. 1993. SCA's provenance experiments with lodgepole pine in north Sweden. In: Lindgren D, editor. Pinus contorta – from untamed forest to domesticated crop. Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO WP 2.02.06 and Frans Kempe Symposium; 1992 Aug 24–28; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Report 11; p. 146–161.
  • Hagner S, Fahlroth S. 1974. On the prospects of cultivating Pinus contorta in north Sweden. Sveriges Skogsvårdsförbunds Tidskrift. 4:477–528. Swedish with English summary.
  • Hallingbäck HR, Jansson G, Hannrup B. 2008. Genetic parameters for grain angle in 28-year-old Norway spruce progeny trials and their parent seed orchard. Ann For Sci. 65(3):1. doi:10.1051/forest:2008005.
  • Hansson P, Karlman M. 1997. Survival, height and health status of 20-year-old Pinus sylvestris and Pinus contorta after different scarification treatments in a harsh boreal climate. Scand J For Res. 12(4):340–350. doi: 10.1080/02827589709355421
  • Hayatgheibi H, Fries A, Kroon J, Wu H. 2017. Genetic analysis of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) solid wood quality traits. Can J For Res. 47(10):1303–1313. doi: 10.1139/cjfr-2017-0152
  • Hong Z, Fries A, Wu HX. 2014. High negative genetic correlations between growth traits and wood properties suggest incorporating multiple traits selection including economic weights for the future Scots pine breeding programs. Ann For Sci. 71(4):463–472. doi: 10.1007/s13595-014-0359-3
  • Koch P. 1996. Lodgepole pine in North America. Madison (WI): Forest Products Society.
  • Lenz P, Auty D, Achim A, Beaulieu J, Mackay J. 2013. Genetic improvement of white spruce mechanical wood traits – early screening by means of acoustic velocity. Forests. 4(3):575–594. doi: 10.3390/f4030575
  • Li X, Huber DA, Powell GL, White TL, Peter GF. 2007. Breeding for improved growth and juvenile corewood stiffness in slash pine. Can J For Res. 37(10):1886–1893. doi: 10.1139/X07-043
  • Li B, McKeand S. 1989. Stability of loblolly pine families in the southeastern US. Silvae Genet. 38(3/4):96–101.
  • Li Y, Suontama M, Burdon RD, Dungey HS. 2017. Genotype by environment interactions in forest tree breeding: review of methodology and perspectives on research and application. Tree Genet Genomes. 13:60. doi:10.1007/s11295-017-1144-x.
  • Lindgren K. 1983. Provenances of Pinus contorta in northern Sweden [dissertation]. Umeå; Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, 91 p.
  • Lindgren D, Lindgren K, Krutzsch P. 1993. Use of lodgepole pine and its provenances in Sweden. In: Lindgren D, editor. 1993. Pinus contorta – from untamed forest to domesticated crop. Proceedings of a meeting with IUFRO WP 2.02.06 and Frans Kempe Symposium; 1992 Aug 24–28; Department of Forest Genetics and Plant Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Report 11; p. 238–263.
  • Lindgren D, Ying CC, Elfving B, Lindgren K. 1994. Site index variation with latitude and altitude in IUFRO Pinus contorta provenance experiments in western Canada and northern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 9(1–4):270–274. doi: 10.1080/02827589409382840
  • Lynch M, Walsh B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland (MA): Sinauer Associates.
  • Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H. 2010. Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists. Biol Rev. 85(4):935–956.
  • Namkoong G, Kang HC, Brouard JS. 2012. Tree breeding: principles and strategies: principles and strategies. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag.
  • Norgren O. 1996. Growth analysis of Scots pine and lodgepole pine seedlings. For Ecol Manag. 86(1–3):15–26. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(96)03800-5
  • Rehfeldt GE. 1988. Ecological genetics of Pinus contorta from the Rocky Mountains (USA): a synthesis. Silvae Genet. 37(3–4):131–135.
  • Rehfeldt GE, Crookston NL, Warwell MV, Evans JS. 2006. Empirical analyses of plant–climate relationships for the western United States. Int J Plant Sci. 167(6):1123–1150. doi: 10.1086/507711
  • Rosvall O. 1994. Stability in lodgepole pine and resistance to wind and snow loads. Redogörelse nr 2 1994, SkogForsk – Forestry Research Institute of Sweden, Uppsala; 47 p. Summary in English.
  • Silva GAP, Gezan SA, de Carvalho MP, Gouvêa LRL, Verardi CK, de Oliveira ALB, de Souza Gonçalves P. 2014. Genetic parameters in a rubber tree population: heritabilities, genotype-by-environment interactions and multi-trait correlations. Tree Genet Genomes. 10(6):1511–1518. doi: 10.1007/s11295-014-0766-5
  • Sokal R, Rohlf F. 1995. Biometry, 3rd ed. New York (NY): Freeman and company; 887 p.
  • Wang T, Hamann A, Yanchuk A, O'Neill G, Aitken S. 2006. Use of response functions in selecting lodgepole pine populations for future climates. Glob Change Biol. 12:2404–2416. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01271.x
  • Wang T, O'Neill GA, Aitken SN. 2010. Integrating environmental and genetic effects to predict responses of tree populations to climate. Ecol Appl. 20(1):153–163. doi: 10.1890/08-2257.1
  • Wang X, Ross RJ, Carter P. 2007. Acoustic evaluation of wood quality in standing trees. Part I. Acoustic wave behavior. Wood Fiber Sci. 39(1):28–38.
  • Wang XP, Ross RJ, McClellan M, Barbour RJ, Erickson JR, Forsman JW, McGinnis GD. 2001. Nondestructive evaluation of standing trees with a stress wave method. Wood Fiber Sci. 33(4):522–533.
  • White TL, Adams WT, Neale DB. 2007. Forest genetics. Wallingford (CT): CABI publishing, CAB International.
  • White T, Hodge G, Powell G. 1993. An advanced-generation tree improvement plan for slash pine in the southeastern United States. Silvae Genetic. 42(6):359–370.
  • Wu HX, Eldridge KG, Matheson AC, Powell MP, McRae TA, Butcher TB, Johnson IG. 2007. Achievement in forest tree improvement in Australia and New Zealand: 8. Successful introduction and breeding of radiata pine to Australia. Aust For. 70(4):215–225. doi: 10.1080/00049158.2007.10675023
  • Wu HX, Ivkovic M, Gapare WJ, Matheson A, Baltunis B, Powell M, McRae T. 2008. Breeding for wood quality and profit in Pinus radiata: a review of genetic parameter estimates and implications for breeding and deployment. New Zeal J For Sci. 38(1):56–87.
  • Wu HX, Matheson AC. 2005. Genotype by environment interactions in an Australia-wide radiata pine diallel mating experiment: implications for regionalized breeding. For Sci. 51(1):29–40.
  • Wu HX, Ying CC. 2004. Geographic patterns of local optimality in natural populations of lodgepole pine. For Ecol Manage. 194(1–3):177–198. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.02.017
  • Xiong JS, Isik F, McKeand SE, Whetten RW. 2010. Genetic variation of stem forking in loblolly pine. For Sci. 56(5):429–436.
  • Ying CC. 1991. Performance of lodgepole pine provenances at sites in southwestern British Columbia. Silvae Genet. 40(5–6):215–223.
  • Ying CC, Illingworth K, Carlson M. 1985. Geographic variation in lodgepole pine and its implications for tree improvement in British Columbia. In: Baumgartner DM, editor. Proceedings of the Lodgepole Pine – the Species and its Management Symposium; 8–16 May 1984, Spokane (WA)/Vancouver: Washington State University/Pullman; p. 43–53.
  • Zobel BJ, Jett JB. 1995. Genetics of wood production. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.