Unrecorded volume of Norway spruce timber in cut-to-length harvesting

References

• Adolt R, Kučera M, Kohn I, Kratěna L, Fejfar J, Závodský J, Piškytlová K, Čech Z. 2016. Výstupy Národní inventarizace lesů uskutečněné v letech 2011–2015, 3. Těžba dříví (Outputs of the national forest inventory in 2011–2015, 3. harvesting). Lesnická práce. 95(2):8. Available from: http://nil.uhul.cz/data/documents/vysledky_projektu_nil2/tezba_drivi_lp_unor_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson B, Dyson P. 2001. Log measuring accuracy of harvesters and processors. In: Council on forest engineering (COFE) Conference proceedings: Appalachian hardwoods: managing change. Snowshoe, July 15-18, 2001. Vancouver, British Columbia: Forest Engineering Research Institute of Canada; p. 5; Available from: https://cofe.frec.vt.edu/documents/2001/COFE_2001_Anderson_Dyson.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bembenek M, Mederski PS, Karaszewski Z, Łacka A, Grzywinski W, Wegiel A, Giefing DF, Erler J. 2015. Length accuracy of logs from birch and aspen harvested in thinning operations. Turkish J Agri For. 39:845–850. doi:10.3906/tar-1406-39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beranová M, Navrátilová M. 2017. Zhodnocení efektivnosti hospodářské činnosti menšinových státních lesních podniků v ČR a SR v letech 2005-2014 (Economic assessment of minority state forest enterprises in the Czech Republic and Slovak Republic in 2005–2014). Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu - Reports of Forestry Research. 62(2):95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter RD, Sonderman DL, Rast ED, Jones MJ. 1989. Defects in hardwood timber. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No. 678. p. 88.
   Google Scholar
• CITES. 2006. Standard Procedure for the Measurement of Logs and Saw Wood of Timber Species Included in Appendices II and III. In: Sixteenth meeting of the Plants Committee Lima (Peru), 3-8 July 2006, 11 p. Available from: https://www.cites.org/sites/default/files/eng/com/pc/16/E-PC16-19-03.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Conradie IP, Greene WD, Murphy GE. 2003. Value recovery with harvesters in south-eastern USA pine stands. Bar Harbor: Council of Forest Engineering Symposium: Forest Operations Among Competing Forest Uses. https://cofe.frec.vt.edu/documents/2003/COFE_2003_Conradie_et_al.pdf Available from: [Cited 27 December 2019].
   Google Scholar
• CSO, Czech Statistical Office. 2019. Lesnictví – 2018 (Forestry - 2018). Available from: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/lesnictvi-2018 [Cited 27 December 2019].
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Bystrický R, Hošková P, Hrib M, Jarkovská M, Kováč J, Krilek J, Natov P, Natovová L. 2011. The use of harvester technology in production forests. Prague, Czech Republic: Lesnická práce. p. 156.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Chytrý M, Natov P, Jankovský M, Beljan K. 2019. Long-term cost analysis of Mid-performance harvesters in Czech conditions. Austrian J For Sci. 136(4):351–372.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Natov P. 2016. Plošný výrobní potenciál pro harvestorovou technologii v ČR k 31. 12. 2015. - specializované mapy s odborným obsahem (Potencial area for timber production by harvester technology in the Czech Republic, 31st December 2015 – specialized maps). Prague, Czech Republic: Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague. p. 32.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Natov P, Bystrický R. 2018b. Plošný a výrobní potenciál pro harvestorovou technologii v ČR (Surface and production potential for harvester technology in the Czech Republic). Lesnická práce. 97(9):54–57.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Natov P, Chytrý M. 2017. Comparison of different scaling methods of harvester-processed timber. Bulletin of the Transilvania University of Brasov. 59(10):19–26.
   Google Scholar
• Dvořák J, Natov P, Jankovský M. 2018a. Analysis of unregistered timber volume in allowance in cut-to-length logging. In: Formec. 51st edition of the international symposium of forestry mechanization. Proceedings. 24–28 September 2018. Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar. Madrid, Spain: Fundación Conde del Valle de Salazar; p. 97–111. Available from: https://www.formec.org/images/proceedings/2018/Proceedings2018.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari E, Spinelli R, Cavallo E, Magagnotti N. 2012. Attitudes towards mechanized cut-to-length technology among logging contractors in Northern Italy. Scandinavian J For Res. 27(8):800–806. doi:10.1080/02827581.2012.693192.
   Google Scholar
• Husch B, Beers TW, Kershaw JA. Jr. 2003. Forest Mensuration, 4th ed. New York, NY, USA: JohnWiley and Sons. p. 443.
   Google Scholar
• Janák K. 2007. Differences in round wood measurements using Electronic 2D and 3D systems and standard manual method. Drvna Industrija. 58(3):127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Jankovský M, Natov P, Dvořák J, Szala L. 2019. Norway spruce bark thickness models based on log midspan diameter for use in mechanized forest harvesting in Czechia. Scandinavian J For Res. 34(7):617–626. doi:10.1080/02827581.2019.1650952.
   Google Scholar
• Laasasenaho J, Melkas T, Aldén S. 2005. Modelling bark thickness of Picea abies with taper curves. For Ecol Manag. 206:35–47. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.058.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitner T, Stampfer K, Visser R. 2014. Analysing log length measurement accuracy of harvester and processor heads. Austrian J For Sci. 131:129–146.
   Google Scholar
• Löwe R, Sedmíková M, Natov P, Dvořák J, Jankovský M. 2019b. Analýza neevidovaného objemu dříví v přídavcích k délce výřezů při výrobě smrkového dříví harvestorovou technologií (Analysis of unrecorded timber volume in length allowances of logs in spruce timber production by harvesteŕs technology). Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu - Reports of Forestry Research. 64(4):207–216.
   Google Scholar
• Löwe R, Sedmíková M, Natov P, Jankovský M, Hejcmanová P, Dvořák J. 2019a. Differences in timber volume estimates using various algorithms available in the control and information systems of harvesters. Forests. 10(5):388. doi:10.3390/f10050388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundbäck M, Häggström C, Nordfjell T. 2018. Worldwide trends in the methods and systems for harvesting, extraction and transportation of roundwood. In: Proceedings of the 6th international forest engineering conference “quenching our thirst for new knowledge”. 16–19. April 2018. Rotorua, New Zealand: p. 3; Available from: http://www.foresteng.canterbury.ac.nz/FEC2018.shtml.
   Google Scholar
• Makkonen I. 2001. Factors affecting measurement accuracy in processing heads. For Eng Res Ins Canada, Adv. 2(24):1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Marence J, Vadnjal J, Kosir B. 2009. Bucking of conifers using the Woody H60 Processors on the Syncrofalke 3T cable yarder in the Alpine foothills. Zbornik gozdarstva in lesarstva. 88:3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall HD, Murphy GE, Boston K. 2006a. Evaluation of the economic impacts of length and diameter measurement error on mechanical harvesters and processors operating in pine stands. Can J For Res. 36:1661–1673. doi: 10.1139/x06-064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall HD, Murphy GE, Lachenbruch B. 2006b. Effects of bark thickness estimates on optimal log merchandising. For Prod J. 56:87–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mederski P, Bembenek M S, Karaszewski Z, Lacka A, Szcepanska-Álvarez A, Rosinska M. 2016. Estimating and modelling harvester productivity in pine stands of different ages, densities and thinning intensities. Croatian J For Eng. 37(1):27–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2002. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2001 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2001). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2003. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2002 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2002). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2004. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2003 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2003). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2005. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2004 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2004). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2006. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2005 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2005). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2007. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2006 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2006). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2008. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2007 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2007). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2009. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2008 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2008). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2010. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2009 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2009). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2011. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2010 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2010). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2016. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2015 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2015). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic. 2019. Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2018 (Report on the state of forests and forestry in the Czech Republic in the year 2018). Prague, Czech Republic: Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic.
   Google Scholar
• Moskalik T, Borz SA, Dvořák J, Ferenčík M, Glushkov S, Muiste P, Lazdinš A, Styranivsky O. 2017. Timber harvesting methods in Eastern European countries: a review. Croatian J Forest Eng. 38(2):231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natov P, Dvořák J. 2018. Doporučená pravidla pro elektronický příjem dříví harvestory v ČR 2018 (Guidelines for electronic registration of the harvested timber by harvesters in the Czech Republic 2018). Prague, Czech Republic: Produkce BPP. 136 p.
   Google Scholar
• Natov P, Dvořák J, Sedmíková M, Löwe R, Ferenčík M. 2017. Srovnání vyrobeného objemu dříví harvestorem se zásobou porostu stanovenou objemovými tabulkami (Comparison of harvester-produced timber volume with the standing timber volume determined by volume tables). Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu – Reports of Forestry Research. 62(1):1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuis M, Dooley T. 2006. The effect of calibration on the accuracy of harvester measurements. Int J For Eng. 17:25–33. doi:10.1080/14942119.2006.10702533.
   Google Scholar
• Opferkuch M, Jaeger D, Wagner T. 2014. Improved wood delivery by new scaling methods of Log piles. In: Formec. 47th international symposium on forestry mechanisation: “forest engineering: propelling the forest value chain”, September 23-26, 2014 in Gerardmer, France. Available from: https://www.formec.org/images/proceedings/2014/a185.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PHP.net. 2019. Function array-rand.php, PHP manual. Available from: www.php.net/manual/en/function.array-rand.php [Cited 2019 November 20].
   Google Scholar
• Poleno Z, Vlková V, Rybníček P. 1994. Lesnický naučný slovník, díl I (Forestry Vocabulary, volume I). Prague, Czech Republic: Agrospoj. p. 743.
   Google Scholar
• Pulkki R. 1997. Cut-to-length, tree-length or full tree harvesting? Central Woodlands. 1:22–27.
   Google Scholar
• Šafařík D, Hlaváčová P. 2015. Losses in the amount of produced and sold timber. Procedia Economics and Finance. 34:51–57. doi: 10.1016/S2212-5671(15)01600-7
   Google Scholar
• Simanov V. 2003. Rozdíly v evidovaném objemu dříví (Differences in recorded volume of timber). Lesnická práce. 82(2):32–34.
   Google Scholar
• Skogforsk. 2012a. Project StanForD Classic Documents. (last update 2012-04-18). The Forest Research Institute of Sweden. Upssala: Sweden, [Cited 2019 December 03]. Available from: https://www.skogforsk.se/english/projects/stanford/.
   Google Scholar
• Skogforsk. 2012b. Standard for Forest Data and Communications. Appendix: Definitions of variables – General and country specific. (last update 2012-04-18). The Forest Research Institute of Sweden. Upssala: Sweden, p. 32 [Cited 2019 December 03]. Available from: https://www.skogforsk.se/cd_20190114161714/contentassets/b063db555a664ff8b515ce121f4a42d1/appendix1_eng_120418.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Skogforsk. 2019. Introduction to StanForD 2010. (last update 2019-02-06). The Forest Research Institute of Sweden. Upssala: Sweden, p. 81 [Cited 2020 July 23]. Available from: https://www.skogforsk.se/cd_20190206130936/contentassets/1a68cdce4af1462ead048b7a5ef1cc06/stanford-2010-introduction-190106.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Lombardini C, Magagnotti N. 2014. The effect of mechanization level and harvesting system on the thinning cost of Mediterranean softwood plantations. Silva Fenn. 48:1–15. doi:10.14214/sf.1003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Forest Enterprise. 2019. Výroba a prodej dříví na LS a LZ – procesní směrnice 8/2019 (Production and sale of timber for LS and LZ - procedural directive 8/2019). Hradec Králové, Czech Republic: Lesy České republiky. p. 42.
   Google Scholar
• Strandgard M. 2009. Evaluation of manual log measurement errors and its implications on harvester log measurement accuracy. Int J For Eng. 20:9–16. doi:10.1080/14942119.2009.10702578.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal C, Alberdi I, Hernández L, Redmond J. 2016. National forest inventories: Assessment of wood availability and use. Cham: Springer International Publishing Switzerland. p. 845.
   Google Scholar
• Wojnar T. 2007. Doporučená pravidla pro měření a třídění dříví v České republice 2008 (Guidelines for timber scaling in the Czech Republic 2008), 2nd ed. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Czech Republic: Lesnická práce. p. 147.
   Google Scholar
• Zinkevičius R, Steponavičius D, Vitunskas D, Činga G. 2012. Comparison of harvester and motor-manual logging in intermediate cuttings of deciduous stands. Turkish J Agri Forestry. 36:591–600. doi:10.3906/tar-1103-46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar