196
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Policy change and National Forest Programs: a Swiss experience of coalitions, external and internal events

, &
Pages 417-431 | Received 27 Jan 2020, Accepted 19 Aug 2020, Published online: 22 Sep 2020

References

  • BAFU. 2006. Teilrevision Waldgesetz: Ergebnis der Vernehmlassung. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt. 36S.
  • BAFU. 2009. Zwischenbericht 2009 zum Waldprogramm Schweiz (WAP-CH). 87.
  • BAFU Bundesamt für Umwelt. 2013. Funktionen des Waldes. [Accessed 2020 July 14]. http://www.bafu.admin.ch/wald/01198/index.html?lang=de.
  • Bandelow NC, Vogeler CS, Hornung J, Kuhlmann J, Heidrich S. 2017. Learning as a necessary but not sufficient condition for major health policy change: a qualitative comparative analysis combining ACF and MSF. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract. 21(2):167–182.
  • Capano G. 2009. Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem. J Comp Policy Anal: Res Pract. 11(1):7–31.
  • EFD & KdK. 2007. Neugestaltung des Finanzausgleichs und der Aufgabenteilung zwischen Bund und Kantonen – NFA. Bern: Eidgenössisches Finanzdepartement, Konferenz der Kantonsregierungen.
  • FAO. 2017. [Accessed 2020 July 14]. http://www.fao.org/forestry/nfp/en/.
  • Federal Office for the Environment FOEN and Federal Statistical Office FSO. 2018. Forstflächen nach Eigentümertyp und Kantonen (Forest area by owner types and cantons), Data Set 2004–2017. [Accessed 2020 June 23]. https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/de/home/statistiken/land-forstwirtschaft/forstwirtschaft/strukturen.assetdetail.5708670.html.
  • FOEN. 2013. Forest policy 2020. Visions, objectives and measures for the sustainable management of forests in Switzerland. Bern: Federal Office for the Environment. 66.
  • Glueck P, Humphreys D. 2002. Research into national forest programmes in a European context. Forest Policy Econ. 4:253–258. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00068-0
  • Harrinkari T, Katila P, Karppinen H. 2016. Stakeholder coalitions in forest politics: revision of finnish forest Act. Forest Policy Econ. 67:30–37. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2016.02.006
  • Harrinkari T, Katila P, Karppinen H. 2017. International influences in the revision of finnish forest act. Scand J Forest Res. 32(1):6–18. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1183702 .
  • Heikkila T, Pierce JJ, Gallaher S, Kagan J, Crow DA, Weible CM. 2014. Understanding a period of policy change: the case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Rev Policy Res. 21:2. doi:10.1111/ropr.12058 .
  • Hogl K, Nordbeck R, Kvarda E. 2009. When international impulses hit home: the role of domestic policy subsystem configurations in explaining different types of sustainability strategies. Forest Policy Econ. 11:357–364. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2008.07.003
  • Humphreys D. 2004. National forest programmes in Europe: generating policy relevant propositions for formulation and implementation. In: Humphreys D, editor. Forests for the future - National forest programmes in Europe. country and regional reports from COST action E19. Luxembourg: Office for or Official Publications of the European Communities; p. 13–43.
  • Hysing E, Olsson J. 2008. Contextualising the advocacy coalition framework: theorising change in Swedish forest policy. Env Polit. 17(5):730–748. doi: 10.1080/09644010802421471
  • Jenkins-Smith HC, Nohrstedt D, Weible CM, Ingold K. 2014. Advocacy coalition framework: foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In: P. A. Sabatier, C. M. Weible, editor. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; p. 183–224.
  • Lijphart A. 1999. Patterns of democracy, a comprehensive study of democracies around the world. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
  • Markard J, Suter M, Ingold K. 2016. Socio-technical transitions and policy change–advocacy coalitions in Swiss energy policy. Environ Innov Societal Transit. 18:215–237. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2015.05.003
  • Nohrstedt D, Weible CM. 2010. The logic of policy change after crisis: proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Pol. 1(2):1–32. doi: 10.2202/1944-4079.1035
  • NZZ. 2003. Entwicklung der Rohholzpreise und der Lohnkosten in der Forstwirtschaft. Eine Zeitreihe von 1919 / 1939 bis 2014.
  • Projektleitung WAP-CH, BHP – Brugger & Partner. 2004. Waldprogramm Schweiz (WAP-CH). Schriftenreihe Umwelt Nr. 363. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft. 117.
  • Puelzl H, Rametsteiner E. 2002. Grounding international modes of governance into national forest programmes. Forest Policy Econ. 4(4):259–268. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00069-2
  • Sabatier PA. 1998. The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe. J Eur Public Pol. 5:98–130. doi: 10.1080/13501768880000051
  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H. 1988. An advocacy coalition model of policy change and the role of policy orientated learning therein. Policy Sci. 21:129–168. doi: 10.1007/BF00136406
  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H. 1993. Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Sabatier P, Jenkins-Smith H. 1999. The advocacy coalition framework: an assessment. In: Sabatier P, editor. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; p. 117–166.
  • Sabatier PA, Weible C. 2007. The advocacy coalition framework: innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA, editor. Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press; p. 189–220.
  • SAEFL. 2004. Swiss national forest programme (Swiss NFP), environmental documentation No. 363. Bern: Swiss Agency for the Environment, Forests and Landscape. 117.
  • Schulz T, Lieberherr E, Zabel A. 2018. Network governance in national Swiss forest policy: Balancing effectiveness and legitimacy. Forest Policy Econ. 89:42–53. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2016.10.011 .
  • Sotirov M, Memmler M. 2012. The advocacy coalition framework in natural resource policy studies – recent experiences and further prospects. Forest Policy Econ. 16:51–64. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.06.007
  • Steinmann K, Lieberherr E, Zimmermann W. 2017. Waldpolitik der Schweiz – Ein Lehrbuch. Zürich / St. Gallen: Dike Verlag AG.
  • Weible CM. 2005. Beliefs and perceived influence in a natural resource conflict: an advocacy coalition approach to policy networks. Polit Res Q. 58:461–475. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800308
  • Weible CM, Heikkila T, de Leon P, Sabatier PA. 2012. Understanding and influencing the policy process. Policy Sci. 45:1–21. doi:10.1007/s11077-011-9143-5 .
  • Weible CM, Sabatier PA, McQueen K. 2009. Themes and variations: taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Stud J. 37:121–140. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x
  • Wilkes-Allemann J, Steinmann K, Zabel A, Lieberherr E. 2017. Zwischenbericht 2016 zur Waldpolitik 2020. Bern: Bundesamt für Umwelt. 44.
  • Winkel G, Sotirov M. 2011. An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of “new modes of governance” in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy Econ. 13(2011):143–154. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2010.06.005
  • Yin R. 2009. Case study research, design and methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks and London: SAGE.
  • Zimmermann W. 2012. Waldpolitischer Jahresrückblick 2011. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen. 163(5):145–154. doi: 10.3188/szf.2012.0145
  • Zimmermann W. 2013. Waldpolitischer Jahresrückblick 2012. Schweizerische Zeitschrift fürForstwesen. 164(5):135–142. doi: 10.3188/szf.2013.0135
  • Zimmermann W, Widmer A. 2009. Waldpolitischer Jahresrückblick 2008. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen. 160(5):105–113. doi: 10.3188/szf.2009.0105
  • Zingerli C., Zimmermann W. 2006. Ansätze moderner politischer Steuerung in der Schweizer Waldpolitik. Schweiz. Z. Forstwes. 157(1):8–16. doi: 10.3188/szf.2006.0008

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.