Effect of site preparation under shelterwood on Norway spruce seedlings

References

• Atkins WRG. 1928. Seasonal variations in the phosphate and silicate content of sea water during 1926 and 1927 in relation to the phytoplankton crop. J Mar Biol Assoc UK. 151:191–206. doi: 10.1017/S0025315400055636
   Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker BM, Walker SC. 2015. Fitting linear mixedeffects models using lme4. J Stat Softw. 67(1):1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauman JM, Keiffer CH, Hiremath S, McCarthy BC. 2013. Soil preparation methods promoting ectomycorrhizal colonization and American chestnut Castanea dentata establishment in coal mine restoration. J Appl Ecol. 50:721–729. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogeat-Triboulot M-B, Bartoli F, Garbaye J, Marmeisse R, Tagu D. 2004. Fungal ectomycorrhizal community and drought affect root hydraulic properties and soil adherence to roots of Pinus pinaster seedlings. Plant Soil. 267:213–223. doi:10.1007/s11104-005-5349-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett AN. 1990. Physiological processes in plantation establishment and the development of specifications for forest planting stock. Can J For Res. 20:415–427. doi:10.1139/x90-059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caudullo G, Tinner W, de Rigo D. 2016. Picea abies in Europe: distribution, habitat, usage and threats. In: J. San-Miguel-Ayanz, D. de Rigo, G. Caudullo, T. Houston Durrant, A. Mauri, editor. European Atlas of forest tree species. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union; p. 114–116.
   Google Scholar
• Celma S, Blate K, Lazdiņa D, Dūmiņš K, Neimane S, Štāls TA, Štikāne K. 2019. Effect of soil preparation method on root development of P. sylvestris and P. abies saplings in commercial forest stands. New For. 50:283–290. doi:10.1007/s11056-018-9654-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chantal M, Leinonen K, Kuuluvainen T, Cescatti A. 2003. Early response of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies seedlings to an experimental canopy gap in a boreal spruce forest. Forest Ecol Manag. 176:321–336. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00273-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrimes D, Nilson K. 2005. Overstorey density influence on the height of Picea abies regeneration in northern Sweden. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research. 78:433–442. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpi039.
   Google Scholar
• Ciccarese L, Mattsson A, Pettenella D. 2012. Ecosystem services from forest restoration: thinking ahead. New For. 43:543–560. doi:10.1007/s11056-012-9350-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubera E, Moreno G, Solla A. 2009. Quercus ilex root growth in response to heterogeneous conditions of soil bulk density and soil NH4-N content. Soil Tillage Res. 103:16–22. doi:10.1016/j.still.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felton A, Lindbladh M, Brunet J, Fritz Ö. 2010. Replacing coniferous monocultures with mixed-species production stands: an assessment of the potential benefits for forest biodiversity in Northern Europe. For Ecol Manag. 260:939–947. doi:10.1139/x97-10 doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2010.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genikova NV, Toropova EV, Kryshen’ AM, Mamontov VN. 2018. [Сhanges in the ground cover structure in the “forest – forest edge – cutover” ecotone in a bilberry spruce stand ten years after logging]. Trudy KarNC RAN. 10:12–26. [in Russian with abstract in English]. doi:10.17076/eco877.
   Google Scholar
• Gradowski T, Sidders D, Keddy T, Lieffers VJ, Landhausser SM. 2008. Effects of overstory retention and site preparation on growth of plantedwhite spruce seedlings in deciduous and coniferous dominated borealplains mixedwoods. Forest Ecol Manag. 255:3744–3749. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2008.03.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhus A, Brække FH, Hanssen KH, Haveraaen O. 2003. Effects of partial cutting and scarification on planted Picea abies at mid-elevation sites in south-east Norway. Scand J For Res. 18:237–246. doi:10.1080/02827581.2003.9728294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granhus A, Hanssen KH, de Chantal M. 2008. Emergence and seasonal mortality of naturally regenerated Picea abies seedlings: impact of overstory density and two site preparation methods. New For. 35:75–87. doi:10.1007/s11056-007-9061-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossnickle SC. 2005. Importance of root growth in overcoming planting stress. New For. 30:273–294. doi:10.1007/s11056-004-8303-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo D, Xia M, Wei X, Chang W, Liu Y, Wang Z. 2008. Anatomical traits associated with absorption and mycorrhizal colonization are linked to root branch order in twenty-three Chinese temperate tree species. New Phytol. 180:673–683. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hånell B. 1993. Regeneration of Picea abies forests on highly productive peatlands—clearcutting or selective cutting? Scand J For Res. 8:518–527. doi:10.1080/02827589309382798.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harper KA, Macdonald SE, Burton PJ, Chen J, Brosofske KD, Saunders SC, Euskirchen ES, Roberts D, Jaiteh MS, Esseen P-A. 2005. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in Fragmented Landscapes. Conserv Biol. 19:768–782. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.2005.00045.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heineman JL, Bedford L, Sword D. 1999. Root system development of 12-year-old white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) on a mounded subhygric-mesic site in northern interior British Columbia. Forest Ecol Manag. 123:167–177. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00022-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holgén P, Hånell B. 2000. Performance of planted and naturally regenerated seedlings in Picea abies-dominated shelterwood stands and clearcuts in Sweden. Forest Ecol Manag. 127:129–138. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(99)00125-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T. 1994. Gap disturbance, ground microtopography, and the regeneration dynamics of boreal coniferous forests in Finland: a review. Ann Zool Fennici. 31:35–51. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23735497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Kalmari R. 2003. Regeneration microsites of Picea abies seedlings in a windthrow area of a boreal old-growth forest in southern Finland. Ann Bot Fenn. 40:401–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Tahvonen O, Aakala T. 2012. Even-Aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: A Review. Ambio. 41:720–737. doi:10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova A, Brockhoff PB, Christensen RHB. 2017. lmertest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. J Stat Softw. 82(13):1–26. doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langvall O, Löfvenius MO. 2002. Effect of shelterwood density on nocturnal near-ground temperature, frost injury risk and budburst date of Norway spruce. For Ecol Manag. 168:149–161. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00754-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langvall O, Örlander G. 2001. Effects of pine shelterwoods on microclimate and frost damage to Norway spruce seedlings. Can J Forest Res. 31:155–164. doi:10.1139/x00-149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lilja S, Wallenius T, Kuuluvainen T. 2006. Structure and development of old Picea abies forests in northern boreal Fennoscandia. Écoscience. 13:181–192. doi:10.2980/i1195-6860-13-2-181.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopushinsky W, Max TA. 1990. Effect of soil temperature on root and shoot growth and on budburst timing in conifer seedling transplants. New Forest. 4:107–124. doi:10.1007/BF00119004.
   Google Scholar
• Man R, Lieffers VJ. 1999. Effects of shelterwood and site preparation on microclimate and establishment of white spruce seedlings in a boreal mixedwood forest. Forest Chron. 75:837–844. doi:10.5558/tfc75837-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehtatalo L, Lappi J. 2020. Biometry for forestry and environmental data: With Examples in R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murcia С. 1995. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 10:58–62. doi:10.1016/S0169-5347(00)88977-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nazarova LE. 2015. Klimat Karelii. In: Filatov N.N., Subetto D.A., Regerand T.I., editors. Morya, Ozera i transgranichnye vodosbory Rossii, Finlyandii i Estonii. Petrozavodsk: Karel'skij nauchnyj centr RAN [in Russian]; p. 192–200. [Climate of Karelia. In N.N. Filatov, D.A.Subetto, T.I. Regerand (Eds), Seas, lakes and transboundary drainages of Russia, Finland and Estonia].
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Gemmel P, Johansson U, Karlsson M, Welander T. 2002. Natural regeneration of Norway spruce, Scots pine and birch under Norway spruce shelterwoods of varying densities on a mesic-dry site in southern Sweden. Forest Ecol Manag. 161:133–145. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00497-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson O, Hjelm K, Nilsson U. 2019. Early growth of planted Norway spruce and Scots pine after site preparation in Sweden. Scand J For Res. 34:678–688. doi:10.1080/02827581.2019.1659398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Luoranen J, Kolström T, Örlander G, Puttonen P. 2010. Reforestation with planting in Northern Europe. Scand J For Res. 25:283–294. doi:10.1080/02827581.2010.498384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson U, Örlander G, Karlsson M. 2006. Establishing mixed forests in Sweden by combining planting and natural regeneration—effects of shelterwoods and scarification. Forest Ecol Manag. 237:301–311. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.09.053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordborg F, Nilsson U, Örlander G. 2003. Effects of different soil treatments on growth and net nitrogen uptake of newly planted Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings. Forest Ecol Manag. 180:571–582. doi:10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00650-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Örlander G, Nordlander G. 2003. Effects of field vegetation control on pine weevil (Hylobius abietis) damage to newly planted Norway spruce seedlings. Ann For Sci. 60:667–671. doi:10.1051/forest:2003059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennanen T, Heiskanen J, Korkama T. 2005. Dynamics of ectomycorrhizal fungi and growth of Norway spruce seedlings after planting on a mounded forest clearcut. Forest Ecol Manag. 213:243–252. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2005.03.044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersson M, Örlander G. 2003. Effectiveness of combinations of shelterwood, scarification, and feeding barriers to reduce pine weevil damage. Can J Forest Res. 33:64–73. doi:10.1139/x02-156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poorter H, Niklas KJ, Reich PB, Oleksyn J, Poot P, Mommer L. 2012. Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytol. 193:30–50. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkar D, Haldar A. 2005. Physical and chemical methods in soil analysis. Delhi: New Age International.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 9:671–675. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sit V. 1995. Analyzing ANOVA Designs. Biometrics Information Handbook No. 5. Province of British Columbia. Ministry of Forests Research Program.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolov AI. 2006. Lesovosstanovlenie na vyrubkah Severo-Zapada Rossii [Reforestation in the clear cutting of the North-West of Russia]. Petrozavodsk: Karel'skij nauchnyj centr RAN [in Russian].
   Google Scholar
• Štícha V, Kupka I, Zahradník D, Vacek S. 2010. Influence of micro-relief and weed competition on natural regeneration of mountain forests in the Šumava Mountains. J For Sci. 56:218–224. doi:10.17221/28/2009-JFS.
   Google Scholar
• Sutherland B, Foreman FF. 2000. Black spruce and vegetation response to chemical and mechanical site preparation on a boreal mixedwood site. Can J For Res. 30:1561–1570. doi:10.1139/x00-087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan KH. 2005. Soil Sampling, preparation and analysis, Second edition. New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Watson GW, Kelsey P. 2006. The impact of soil compaction on soil aeration and fine root density of Quercus palustris. Urban For Urban Gree. 4:69–74. doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2005.08.001.
   Google Scholar