Key drivers and obstacles for performance among forest harvesting service contractors – a qualitative case study from Sweden

References

• Ager B. 2014. Skogsarbetets humanisering och rationalisering från 1900 och framåt [The humanization and rationalization of forestry from 1900 and forward] [doctoral thesis]. Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Barney JB. 1986. Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manage Sci. 32(10):1231–1241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.10.1231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjaminsson F, Kronholm T, Erlandsson E. 2019. A framework for characterizing business models applied by forestry service contractors. Scand J Forest Res. 34(8):779–788. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2019.1623304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacot E, Emeyriat R, Bouvet A, Helou TE. 2010. Tools and analysis of key success factors for mechanized forest contractors specializing in mechanized harvesting in the Aquitaine region. Proceedings of the FORMEC 2010; July 11–14 2010; Padova, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell JW, Poth CN. 2016. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Drolet S, LeBel L. 2010. Forest harvesting entrepreneurs, perception of their business status and its influence on performance evaluation. Forest Policy Econ. 12(4):287–298. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2009.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, LeBel L, Lindroos O. 2015. Management of outsourced forest harvesting operations for better customer-contractor alignment. Forest Pol Econ. 53:45–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2015.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, LeBel L, Lindroos O. 2017. The effect of customer–contractor alignment in forest harvesting services on contractor profitability and the risk for relationship breakdown. Forests. 8:360. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/f8100360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson M, Lindroos O. 2014. Productivity of harvesters and forwarders in CTL operations in northern Sweden based on large follow-up datasets. Int J Forest Eng. 25(3):179–200. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2014.974309.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E. 2013. The impact of industrial context on procurement, management and development of harvesting services: a comparison of two Swedish Forest owners’ associations. Forests. 4(4):1171–1198. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/f4041171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E. 2016. The triad perspective on business models for wood harvesting-tailoring for service satisfaction within forest owners associations [doctoral thesis]. Acta Universitatis agriculturae Sueciae, 124.
   Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E, Fjeld D. 2017. Impacts of service buyer management on contractor profitability and satisfaction – a Swedish case study. Int J Forest Eng. 28(3):148–156. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2017.1367235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erlandsson E, Fjeld D, Lidestav G. 2017. Measuring quality perception and satisfaction for wood harvesting services with a triad perspective. Int J Forest Eng. 28(1):18–33. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14942119.2017.1257304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner EM, Hiebl MRW. 2015. Risk management in SMEs: A systematic review of available evidence. J Risk Fin. 16(2):122–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/JRF-06-2014-0079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furness-Lindén A. 2008. Affärsutveckling i relationen stor kund/liten leverantör—Vad kan skogsbruket lära? [Business development: large customer-small supplier relations. what can forestry learn from the process?]. Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Ghijisen PWT, Semeijn J, Ernstson S. 2010. Supplier satisfaction and commitment: The role of influence strategies and supplier development. J Purch Suppl Manage. 16(1):17–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilliland DI, Bello DC. 2002. Two sides to attitudinal commitment: The effect of calculative and loyalty commitment on enforcement mechanisms in distribution channels. J Acad Market Sci. 30:24–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/03079450094306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant RM. 1991. The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: implications for strategy formulation. Calif Manage Rev. 33(3):114–135. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41166664.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grönroos C. 1997. Value-driven relational marketing: from products to resources and competencies. J Market Manage. 13(5):407–419. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.1997.9964482.
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson Å. 2017. Assessing work order information quality in harvesting. Silva Fenn. 51(4):6989. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.6989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Häggström C, Kawasaki A, Lidestav G. 2013. Profiles of forestry contractors and development of the forestry-contracting sector in Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 28(4):395–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2012.738826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högnäs T. 2000. Towards supplier partnerships in timber harvesting and transportation. Vantaa: Metsähallitus.
   Google Scholar
• Jack SL, Anderson AR. 2002. The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. J Bus Venturing. 17:467–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(01)00076-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jack SL, Dodd SD, Anderson AR. 2004. Social structures and entrepreneurial networks: The strength of strong ties. Int J Entrepren Innov. 5(2):107–120. doi:https://doi.org/10.5367/000000004773863264.
   Google Scholar
• Jylhä P, Rikkonen P, Hamunen K. (2020). Size matters – an analysis of business models and the financial performance of Finnish wood-harvesting companies. Silva Fenn, 54(4). doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kano N. 1984. Attractive quality and must-be quality. Hinshitsu. 14:39–48.
   Google Scholar
• Kronholm T, Sosa A, Bowditch E, Pohlschneider S, Hamunen K, Rikkonen P. 2019. State of the art and development needs of forestry service contractors in the northern periphery and Arctic region. Helsinki: FOBIA, Natural Resources Institute Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Lidén E. 1995. Forest machine contractors in Swedish industrial forestry – significance and conditions during 1986–1993 [doctoral thesis]. Swedish Universtity of Agricultural Sciences, Garpenberg, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkinen P. 1997. Success factors for forest machine entrepreneurs. J Forest Eng. 8(2):27–35..
   Google Scholar
• Maloni MJ, Benton WC. 2000. Power influences in the supply chain. J Bus Logist. 21(1):42–73.
   Google Scholar
• Mattila O, Toppinen A, Tervo M. 2013. Non-industrial private forestry service markets in a flux: results from a qualitative analysis on Finland. SmallScale Forest. 12:559–578. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-012-9231-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan R, Hunt S. 1994. The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. J Market. 58(3):20–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norin K, Furness-Lindén A. 2008. Vägar till professionell upphandling av tjänster i skogsbruket—Erfarenheter, förslag och inspirationskälla [Ways to improve the procurement of services in forestry—experience, recommendations and inspiration]. Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Norin K, Karlsson A. 2010. Så arbetar en vinnare—Djupintervjuer med tio lönsamma skogsentreprenörer [What makes a winner? Searching interviews with 10 successful forestry contractor businesses]. Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden. (in Swedish).
   Google Scholar
• Norin K, Thorsén Å. 1998. Skogsbrukets “bästa” entreprenadföretag – deras starka sidor och vad de vill förbättra [The top logging contractors – their strengths and aims]. Skogforsk Resultat, No. 9. Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden. (In Swedish with a summary in English).
   Google Scholar
• Penttinen M, Rummukainen A, Mikkola J. 2011. Profitability, liquidity and solvency of wood harvesting contractors in Finland. Smallscale Forest. 10(2):211–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter LW, Steers RM, Mowday RT, Boulian PV. 1974. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. J Appl Psychol. 59(5):603–609. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St-Jean E, LeBel L. 2012. The influence of decisional autonomy on performance and strategic choices – The case of subcontracting SMEs in logging operations. Global Perspectives on Sustainable Forest Management, IntechOpen, London, England, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• St-Jean E, LeBel L. 2014. The influence of start-up motivations on forest entrepreneurs’ performance. J Small Business Entrepren. 27(4):392–405. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2015.1088299.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Forest Agency. 2018. Forestry labour force in 2017. Jönköping: Swedish Official Statistics. Swedish Forest Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Uusitalo J. 2005. A framework for CTL method-based wood procurement logistics. Int J Forest Eng. 16:37–46.
   Google Scholar
• Van Weele AJ. 2009. Purchasing and supply chain management: analysis, strategy, planning and practice. Hampshire: Cengage Learning EMEA.
   Google Scholar
• Wernerfelt B. 1984. A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manage J. 5(2):171–180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar