Identifying old Norway spruce and Scots pine trees by morphological traits and site characteristics

References

• Alberdi I, Cañellas I, Hernández L, Condés S. 2013. A new method for the identification of old-growth trees in national forest inventories: application to Pinus halepensis mill. stands in Spain. Ann For Sci. 70(3):277–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson J, Domingo Gómez E, Michon S, Roberge J-M. 2018. Tree cavity densities and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Scand J For Res. 33(3):233–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson R, Östlund L. 2004. Spatial patterns, density changes and implications on biodiversity for old trees in the boreal landscape of northern Sweden. Biol Conserv. 118(4):443–453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 2021. Kilden – Arealinformasjon. Kilden: NIBIO.
   Google Scholar
• Applequist MB. 1958. A simple pith locator for use with off-center increment cores. J For. 56(2):141.
   Google Scholar
• Barton K. 2020. Package “MuMIn”: Multi-Model Inference.
   Google Scholar
• Baumann C, Gjerde I, Blom HH, Sætersdal M, Nilsen JE, Løken B, Ekanger I. 2001. Miljøregistrering i skog – Biologisk mangfold. Håndbok i registrering av livsmiljøer i skog. Hefte 3. Instruks for registrering 2001: Bd. H. 3. Skogforsk.
   Google Scholar
• Bigler C, Veblen TT. 2009. Increased early growth rates decrease longevities of conifers in subalpine forests. Oikos. 118(8):1130–1138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigler C, Zang RG. 2016. Trade-offs between growth rate, tree size and lifespan of Mountain Pine (Pinus montana) in the Swiss National Park. PLoS ONE. 11(3):1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Black BA, Colbert JJ, Pederson N. 2008. Relationships between radial growth rates and lifespan within North American tree species. Écoscience. 15(3):349–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun DC, Reynolds JD. 2012. Cost-effective variable selection in habitat surveys. Methods Eco Evol. 3(2):388–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks ME, Kristensen K, van Benthem KJ, Magnusson A, Berg CW, Nielsen A, Skaug HJ, Mächler M, Bolker BM. 2017. GlmmTMB balances speed and flexibility among packages for zero-inflated generalized linear mixed modeling. R J. 9(2):378–400.
   Google Scholar
• Brown PM, Gannon B, Battaglia MA, Fornwalt PJ, Huckaby LS, Cheng AS, Baggett LS. 2019. Identifying old trees to inform ecological restoration in montane forests of the central Rocky Mountains, USA. Tree-Ring Res. 75(1):34–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castagneri D, Storaunet KO, Rolstad J. 2013. Age and growth patterns of old Norway spruce trees in Trillemarka forest, Norway. Scand J For Res. 28:232–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawley MJ. 2013. The R book. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gauthier S, Bernier P, Kuuluvainen T, Shvidenko AZ, Schepaschenko DG. 2015. Boreal forest health and global change. Science. 349(6250):819–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gjerde I, Sætersdal M, Blom HH. 2007. Complementary Hotspot Inventory – a method for identification of important areas for biodiversity at the forest stand level. Biol Conserv. 137(4):549–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grantham HS, Moilanen A, Wilson KA, Pressey RL, Rebelo TG, Possingham HP. 2008. Diminishing return on investment for biodiversity data in conservation planning. Conserv Lett. 1:190–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handegard E. 2020. Identifying old Norway spruce and Scots pine trees by visual inspection: an analysis of the relationship between age, spatial distribution and morphological traits in trees [Norwegian University of Life Sciences]. https://hdl.handle.net/11250/2679452.
   Google Scholar
• Hartig F. 2020. DHARMa: residual diagnostics for hierarchical (multi-level/mixed) regression models. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DHARMa.
   Google Scholar
• Henttonen HM, Nöjd P, Suvanto S, Heikkinen J, Mäkinen H. 2019. Large trees have increased greatly in Finland during 1921–2013, but recent observations on old trees tell a different story. Ecol Indic. 99:118–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirby K, Watkins C. 2015. Europe’s changing woods and forests: from wildwood to managed landscapes. Wallingford: CABI Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kubler H. 1991. Function of spiral grain in trees. Trees. 5(3):125–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Aakala T. 2011. Natural forest dynamics in boreal fennoscandia: a review and classification. Silva Fenn. 45(5):823–841.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Gauthier S. 2018. Young and old forest in the boreal: critical stages of ecosystem dynamics and management under global change. For Ecosyst. 5(1):26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen Timo, Mäki Juha, Karjalainen Leena, Lehtonen Hannu. 2002. Tree age distributions in old-growth forest sites in Vienansalo wilderness, eastern Fennoscandia. Silva Fennica. 36(1). https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.14214/sf.556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson John Y. 2000. Veiledning i bestemmelse av vegetasjonstyper i skog. Ås: Norsk institutt for jord- og skogkartlegging.
   Google Scholar
• Lie MH, Arup U, Grytnes JA, Ohlson M. 2009. The importance of host tree age, size and growth rate as determinants of epiphytic lichen diversity in boreal spruce forests. Biodivers Conserv. 18(13):3579–3596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer D, Franklin J. 2002. Conserving forest biodiversity: a comprehensive multiscaled approach. Washington (DC): Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindenmayer DB, Laurance WF, Franklin JF, Likens GE, Banks SC, Blanchard W, Gibbons P, Ikin K, Blair D, Mcburney L, et al. 2014. New policies for old trees: averting a global crisis in a keystone ecological structure. Conserv Lett. 7(1):61–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder P, Östlund L. 1998. Structural changes in three mid-boreal Swedish forest landscapes, 1885-1996. Biol Conserv. 85:9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu J, Yang B, Lindenmayer DB. 2019. The oldest trees in China and where to find them. Front Ecol Environ. 17(6):319–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes U, Kelly PE, Larson DW. 2008. Predicting the age of ancient Thuja occidentalis on cliffs. Can J For Res. 38(12):2923–2931.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naidoo R, Balmford A, Ferraro PJ, Polasky S, Ricketts TH, Rouget M. 2006. Integrating economic costs into conservation planning. Trends Ecol Evol. 21(12):681–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Johnson PCD, Schielzeth H. 2017. The coefficient of determination R2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded. J R Soc Interface. 14(134):20170213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa S, Schielzeth H, O'Hara RB. 2013. A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods Ecol Evol. 4(2):133–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nascimbene J, Marini L, Motta R, Nimis PL. 2009. Influence of tree age, tree size and crown structure on lichen communities in mature Alpine spruce forests. Biodivers Conserv. 18(6):1509–1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Wedderburn RWM. 1972. Generalized linear models. J Royal Stat Soc Ser A (Gen). 135(3):370. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2344614.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolan V, Reader T, Gilbert F, Atkinson N. 2020. The ancient tree inventory: a summary of the results of a 15 year citizen science project recording ancient, veteran and notable trees across the UK. Biodivers Conserv. 29(11):3103–3129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pederson N. 2010. External characteristics of old trees in the eastern deciduous forest. Nat Areas J. 30:396–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QGIS Geographic Information System (3.2.3). 2020. Open Source Geospatial Foundation Project.
   Google Scholar
• R Core team. 2018. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rinntech. 2003. TSAP-Win User Reference (version 0.53).
   Google Scholar
• Rötheli E, Heiri C, Bigler C. 2012. Effects of growth rates, tree morphology and site conditions on longevity of Norway spruce in the northern Swiss Alps. Eur J For Res. 131(4):1117–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma RP, Brunner A, Eid T. 2012. Site index prediction from site and climate variables for Norway spruce and Scots pine in Norway. Scand J For Res. 27(7):619–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skatter S, Kučera B. 1997. Spiral grain – an adaptation of trees to withstand stem breakage caused by wind-induced torsion. Eur J Wood Wood Prod. 55(4):207–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sætersdal M, Gjerde I, Heegaard E, Schei F, Nilsen J. 2016. History and productivity determine the spatial distribution of key habitats for biodiversity in Norwegian forest landscapes. Forests. 7(12):11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Norwegian Mapping Authority. 2021. Geonorge. https://www.geonorge.no/.
   Google Scholar
• Thunes KH, Skarveit J, Gjerde I. 2003. The canopy arthropods of old and mature pine Pinus sylvestris in Norway. Ecography. 26(4):490–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tveite B, Braastad H. 1984. Bonitering for gran, furu og bjørk. Ås: Norsk institutt for skogforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Van Pelt R. 2007. Identifying mature and old forests in western Washington. I Washington State Department of Natural Resources (s. 1–104). https://www.dnr.wa.gov/publications/lm_hcp_west_oldgrowth_guide_full_lowres.pdf?u29mn4.
   Google Scholar
• Weisberg PJ, Ko DW. 2012. Old tree morphology in singleleaf pinyon pine (Pinus monophylla). For Ecol Manag. 263:67–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wetherbee R, Birkemoe T, Sverdrup-Thygeson A. 2020. Veteran trees are a source of natural enemies. Sci Rep. 10(1):18485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar