182
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Utility of the Forest Data Bank for forest management – polish case study and legal analysis

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 83-91 | Received 31 May 2021, Accepted 08 Nov 2021, Published online: 20 Nov 2021

References

  • Act of 27 April 2001. Environmental Protection Law (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1219) (in Polish). www.isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  • Act of 28 September 1991 on forests (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 1463) (in Polish). www.isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  • Act of 30 October 2002. On forest tax (Journal of Laws of 2019, item 888) (in Polish). www.isap.sejm.gov.pl.
  • Adamowicz W. 2003. Economic indicators of sustainable forest management: theory versus practice. J For Econ. 9(1):27–40.
  • Baumgartner RJ. 2019. Sustainable development goals and the forest sector – a complex relationship. Forests. 2019(10):152.
  • Bieluk J, Leśkiewicz K. 2017. Forest Act. Comment. Warsaw.
  • Bitner A, Król K, Piotrowski P, Gajczak S. 2019. Analysis of generally available online sources of spatial data in the context of appraising historic real estate property. Geomat Landmanagement Landsc. 14.
  • Council Regulation (EC) No 2173/2005 of 20 December 2005 on the establishment of a FLEGT licensing scheme for imports of timber into the European Community.
  • De Jong W, Pokorny B, Katila P, Galloway G, Pacheco P. 2018. Community forestry and the Sustainable development goals: a two way street. Forests. 9:331.
  • Directive 2007/2/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 March 2007 establishing an Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE).
  • Dubisz S. 2003. Universal dictionary of the Polish language. Vol. V
  • Eurostat. [accessed 2020 November 20]. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Forests,_forestry_and_logging#Forests_and_other_wooded_land.
  • Fontes L, Bontemps JD, Bugmann H, Van Oijen M, Gracia C, Kramer K, Lindner M, Rötzer T, Skovsgaard JP. 2010. Models for supporting forest management in a changing environment. For Syst. 19:9.
  • Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2006. Global forest resources assessment 2005—Progress towards sustainable forest management. FAO Forestry Paper 147.
  • Forest Data Bank. https://www.BDL.lasy.gov.pl/portal/.
  • Fornal-Pieniak B, Żarska B. 2020. Assessment of natural values and environmental threats – a case study: eastern part of the Góra Kalwaria commune, Poland. Acta Sci Pol Adm Locorum. 19(3):149–159. doi:https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.5123.
  • Gale F, Cadman T. 2014. Whose norms prevail? Policy networks, international organizations and “sustainable forest management”. Soc Nat Resour. 27(2):170–184.
  • Gregersen H, El Lakany H, Blaser J. 2017. Forests for sustainable development: a process approach to forest sector contributions to the UN 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Int For Rev. 19(S1).
  • Gregersen H, Lundgren A, Byron N. 1998. Forestry for sustainable development: making it happen. J For. 96(Issue 3):6–10.
  • Hickey GM. 2008, March. Evaluating sustainable forest management. Ecol Indic. 8(Issue 2):141.
  • Humphreys D. 2001. Forest negotiations at the United Nations: explaining cooperation and discord. For Policy Econ. 3(3–4):125–135.
  • Jabłoński M. 2015. National and international definition of forest and its importance for theforest area in Poland. Sylwan. 6:459–482.
  • Judgement of Voivodeship Administrative Court in Warszawa of 12 May 2015 r, III SA/Wa 2432/14.
  • Judgement of Voivodeship Administrative Court in Wrocław of 4 February 2020 r, II SA/Wr 763/19.
  • Judgment of the Supreme Administrative Court of 23 April 2020 r. II OSK 1006/19.
  • Kaliszewski A, Gil W. 2017. Goals and priorities of the ‘National Forest Policy' in the light of the Forest Europe (formerly MCPFE) commitments. Sylwan. 161(8):648–658.
  • Katila P, McDermott C, Larson A, Aggarwal S, Giessen L. 2020. Forest tenure and the Sustainable development goals–a critical view. For Policy Econ. 120.
  • Kriström B, Boman M, Kengen S. 2001. Valuing the multiple functions of forests. World For Mark Policies. 149–161.
  • Kruk H, Kornatowska B. 2014. Sustainable forest management in Poland-theory and practice. Folia For Pol A For. 56(1):54.
  • Lynch OJ. 1998. Law, pluralism and the promotion of sustainable community-based forest management. UNASYLVA-FAO-, 52–56.
  • Machoń M. 2013. Forest menagement in view of needs of the conseration of natural. Roczniki Administracji i Prawa. 13/2013:155–171.
  • Messier C, Puettmann KJ. 2011. Forests as complex adaptive systems: implications for forest management and modelling. Ital J For Mt Environ. 66(3):250.
  • Murray Li T. 2007. Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Econ Soc. 36(2):18–23.
  • Natural Forest Management. [accessed 2020 November 20]. http://www.fao.org/forestry/sfm/85084/en/.
  • Polna M. 2019. Scale and determinants of the designation of forest land for non-forest purposes in Poland. Acta Sci Pol Adm Locorum. 18(2):181–191. doi:https://doi.org/10.31648/aspal.3663.
  • Radecki W. 2017. Forest Act. Comment. Vol. II.
  • Rakoczy B. 2011. Forest Law. Comment. Warsaw.
  • Rakoczy B. 2014. The concept of environmental resources management in legal aspects of environmental resources management. Use of environmental resources. Toruń. 2014:19–32.
  • Rakoczy B. 2018. Forest management and sustainable forest management under Polish law. WKP.
  • Rakoczy B, Stec R, Wożniak A. 2014. Hunting law. Comment, Warszawa. 27.
  • Raszkowski A, Bartniczak B. 2019. On the road to sustainability: implementation of the 2030 agenda sustainable development goals (SDG) in Poland. Sustainability. 11(2):366.
  • Regulation (EU) No 995/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 laying down the obligations of operators who place timber and timber products on the market.
  • Regulation of the Council of Ministers of 10 April 2020 on establishing certain restrictions, orders and prohibitions in connection with the occurrence of a state of epidemic (Journal of Laws of 2020, item 658).
  • Regulation of the Minister of Environment of 12 November 2012 on detailed conditions and procedures for preparing a forest management plan, a simplified forest management plan and inventory of the state of the forest (Journal of Laws of 2012, item 1302).
  • Sikora J, Wartecka-Wazynska A. 2017. Social functions of forests in Poland. Ekonomia i Środowisko. 191.
  • Statistics Poland. 2020. https://stat.gov.pl/obszary-tematyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/roczniki-statystyczne/rocznik-statystyczny-lesnictwa-2020,13,3.html.
  • Sustainable Development Goals. [accessed 2020 November 20]. https://sdgs.un.org/goals/goal15.
  • Talarczyk A. 2015. The Forest Data Bank in Poland as compared with databases and information sharing systems in forestry in other countries. Zeszyty Naukowe Szkoły Głównej Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego t. 15(2):150–158.
  • Talarczyk A. 2017. Forest Data Bank-repository of information about Polish forests. Postępy Techniki w Leśnictwie. 139:18–27.
  • Talarczyk A, Michorczyk A, Karaszkiewicz W, Stelmach R. 2016. Standardization of information on forest habitats and plant communities for the needs of the Forest Data Bank. GIS i dane przestrzenne w ocenach oddziaływania na środowisko. 53–54.
  • Tegegne YT, Cramm M, Van Brusselen J, Linhares-Juvenal T. 2019. Forest concessions and the United Nations Sustainable Development goals: potentials, challenges and ways forward. Forests. 10:45.
  • Timko J, Le Billon P, Zerriffi H, Honey-Rosés J, de la Roche I, Gaston C, CH Sunderland TCH, Kozak RA. 2018. A policy nexus approach to forests and the SDGs: tradeoffs and synergies. Curr Opin Environ Sustain. 34:7–12. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.06.004.
  • Tremblay D, Fortier F, Boucher JF, Riffon O, Villeneuve C. 2020. Sustainable development goal interactions: An analysis based on the five pillars of the 2030 agenda. Sustain Dev. 28(6):1585.
  • Ważyński B. 2008. Basics of forest management. Olecko. 63.
  • Zębek E, Dziembowski R. 2014. The legal and organizational aspects o f the forest resources management. Studia Prawnoustrojowe. 26:365–379.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.