References
- Ahtikoski A, Hökkä H. 2019. Intensive forest management—does it financially pay off on drained peatlands? Can J For Res. 49:1101–1111. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2019-0007
- Ahtikoski A, Salminen H, Hökkä H, Kojola S, Penttilä T. 2012. Optimising stand management on peatlands: the case of northern Finland. Can J For Res. 42:247–259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/x11-174.
- Amacher GS, Ollikainen M, Koskela E. 2009. Economics of forest resources. Cambridge: The MIT Press. 448 p.
- Bailey RL, Dell TR. 1973. Quantifying diameter distributions with the Weibull function. For Sci. 19(2):97–104.
- Bose A K, Harvesy BD, Brais S, Beaudet M, Leduc A. 2014. Constraints to partial cutting in the boreal forest of Canada in the context of natural disturbance-based management: a review. Forestry: Int J Forest Res. 87(1):11–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpt047.
- Cajander AK. 1925. The theory of forest types. Acta Forestalia Fennica, 29, 108 p.
- Cao T, Hyytiäinen K, Tahvonen O, Valsta L. 2006. Effects of initial stand states on optimal thinning regime and rotation of Picea abies stands. Scand J Forest Res. 21:388–398. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580600951915
- Dubey SD. 1967. Some percentile estimators for Weibull parameters. Technometrics. 9:119–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1967.10490445
- Eerikäinen K, Miina J, Valkonen S. 2007. Models for the regeneration establishment and development of established seedlings in uneven-aged, Norway spruce dominated forest stands of southern Finland. Forest Ecol Manag. 242:444−461. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.078
- Gauthier S, Bernier P, Kuuluvainen T, Shvidenko AZ, Schepaschenko DG. 2015. Boreal forest health and global change. Science. 349:819–822. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa9092.
- Hånell B, Ottosson-Löfvenius M. 1994. Windthrow after Shelterwood cutting in Picea abies peatland forests. Scand J Forest Res. 9(1-4):261–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589409382839.
- Hartshorn GS. 1989. Application of gap theory to tropical forest management: natural regeneration on strip clear-cuts in the Peruvian Amazon. Ecology. 70:567–569. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1940208
- Hökkä H, Hytönen J, Saarinen M. 2016. The effect of scalping on seedling establishment after seed tree cutting of Scots pine stands in drained peatlands in northern Finland. Scand J Forest Res. 31(2):166–174. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2015.1105285
- Hökkä H, Laurén A, Stenberg L, Launiainen S, Leppä K, Nieminen M. 2021. Defining guidelines for ditch depth in drained Scots pine dominated peatland forests. Silva Fenn. 55(3):10494. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.10494.
- Hökkä H, Mäkelä H. 2014. Post-harvest height growth of Norway spruce seedlings in northern Finland peatland forest canopy gaps and comparison to partial and complete canopy removals and plantation. Silva Fenn. 48(5):1–16. doi: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1192
- Hökkä H, Repola J. 2018. Pienaukkohakkuun uudistumistulos Pohjois-Suomen korpikuusikoissa 10 vuoden kuluttua Hakkuusta [Regeneration result of a small-gap cutting in spruce stands in northern Finland, ten years after cutting]. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja. Article id. 7808. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.7808
- Hökkä H, Salminen H, Ahtikoski A, Kojola S, Launiainen S, Lehtonen M. 2017. Long-term impact of ditch network maintenance on timber production, profitability and environmental loads at regional level – a simulation study. Forestry. 90(2):234–246. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpw045.
- Hytönen J, Hökkä H, Saarinen M. 2020. The effect of planting, seeding and soil preparation on the regeneration success of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) on drained peatlands – 10-year results. Foresty Studies. 72(1):91–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2020-0008
- Hytönen LA, Aarnio J. 1998. Profitability of ditch-network maintenance on some oligotrophic pine mires. Suo. 49(3):87–99.
- Joosten H, Clarke D. 2002. Wise use of mires and peatlands – backgrounds and principles including a framework for decision-makers. Germany: International Peatland Society, Jyväskylä, Finland and International Mire Conservation Group, Greifswald. 304 p.
- Jutras S, Hökkä H, Alenius V, Salminen H. 2003. Modeling mortality of individual trees in drained peatland sites in Finland. Silva Fenn. 37(2):235–251. doi: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.504
- Juutinen A, Ahtikoski A, Lehtonen M, Mäkipää R, Ollikainen M. 2018b. The impact of a short-term carbon payment scheme on forest management. Forest Policy Econ. 90:115–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.02.005.
- Juutinen A, Ahtikoski A, Mäkipää R, Shanin V. 2018a. Effect of harvest interval and intensity on the profitability of uneven-aged management of Norway spruce stands. Forestry. 91:589–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpy018
- Juutinen A, Shanin V, Ahtikoski A, Rämö J, Mäkipää R, Laiho R, Sarkkola S, Lauren A, Penttilä T, Hökkä H, Saarinen M. 2021. Profitability of continuous cover forestry in Norway spruce-dominated peatland forest and the role of water table. Can J Forest Res. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2020-0305
- Kaila A, Asam Z, Koskinen M, Uusitalo R, Smolander A, Kiikkilä O, Sarkkola S, O’Driscoll C, Kitunen V, Fritze H, et al. 2016. Impact of Re-wetting of forestry-drained peatlands on water quality—a laboratory approach assessing the release of P, N, Fe, and dissolved organic carbon. Water Air Soil Pollut. 227:292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2994-9
- Kojola S. 2009. Kohti hyvää suometsien hoitoa—harvennusten ja kunnostusojitusten vaikutus ojitusaluemänniköiden puuntuotokseen ja metsänkasvatuksen taloustulokseen [Towards best management of drained peatland forests — Impacts of different silvicultural regimes on productivity and financial returns of Scots pine stands]. Dissertationes Forestales, 83. [In Finnish.].
- Kojola S, Ahtikoski A, Hökkä H, Penttilä T. 2012. Profitability of alternative management regimes in Scots pine stands on drained peatlands. Eur J For Res. 131:413–426. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0514-4
- Korkiakoski M, Ojanen P, Penttilä T, Minkkinen K, Sarkkola S, Rainne J, Laurila T, Lohila A. 2020. Impact of partial harvest on CH4 and N2O balances of drained boreal peatland forest. Agr Forest Meteorol. 295:108168. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108168.
- Kuuluvainen T, Pukkala T. 1989. Effect of Scots pine seed trees on the density of ground vegetation and tree seedlings. Silva Fenn. 23:159–167.
- Kuuluvainen T, Tahvonen O, Aakala T. 2012. Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in boreal Fennoscandia: a review. AMBIO. 2012(41):720–737. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0289-y
- Laasasenaho J. 1982. Taper curve and volume functions for pine, spruce and birch. Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae. 108:1–74.
- Laine J. 1989. Metsäojitettujen soiden luokittelu [Summary: classification of peatlands drained for forestry]. Suo. 40:37–51.
- Lappi J. 1991. Calibration of height and volume equations with random parameters. For Sci. 37(3):781–801.
- Laurén A, Palviainen M, Launiainen S, Leppä K, Stenberg L, Urzainki I, Nieminen M, Laiho R, Hökkä H. 2021. Drainage and stand growth response in peatland forests—description, testing, and application of mechanistic peatland simulator SUSI. Forests. 12:293. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/f12030293
- Leppä K, Hökkä H, Laiho R, Launiainen S, Lehtonen A, Mäkipää R, Peltoniemi M, Saarinen M, Sarkkola S, Nieminen M. 2020b. Selection cuttings as a tool to control water table level in boreal drained peatland forests. Front Earth Sci. 8:576510. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.576510
- Leppä K, Korkiakoski M, Nieminen M, Laiho R, Hotanen J-P, Kieloaho A-J, Korpela L, Laurila T, Lohila A, Minkkinen K, et al. 2020a. Vegetation controls of water and energy balance of a drained peatland forest: responses to alternative harvesting practices. Agr Forest Meteorol. 295:018198. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108198.
- Lukkala O. 1946. Korpimetsien luontainen uudistaminen. Referat: Die naturliche Verjungun der Bruchwälder. Communicationes Instituti Foreastalis Fenniae. 34(2):1–137. (In Finnish with German Summary).
- McDonald SE, Yin F. 1999. Factors influencing size inequality in peatland black spruce and tamarack: evidence from postdrainage release growth. J Ecol. 87:404–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00370.x
- Miina J. 1996. Optimizing thinning and rotation in a stand of Pinus sylvestris on a drained peatland site. Scand J Forest Res. 11:182–192. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827589609382927
- Miina J, Pukkala T. 1995. Comparison of thinning methods in a Scots pine stand on drained peatland. A simulation study. Suo. 46(1):1–7.
- Moilanen M, Hytönen J, Hökkä H, Ahtikoski A. 2015. Fertilization increased growth of Scots pine and financial performance of forest management in a drained peatland in Finland. Silva Fenn. 49(3):1301. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1301
- Nieminen M, Ahti K, Koivusalo H, Mattsson T, Sarkkola S, Lauren A. 2010. Export of suspended solids and dissolved elements from peatland areas after ditch network maintenance in south-central Finland. Silva Fenn. 55:39–49.
- Nieminen M, Hökkä H, Laiho R, Juutinen A, Ahtikoski A, Pearson M, Kojola S, Sarkkola S, Launiainen S, Valkonen S, et al. 2018. Could continuous cover forestry be an economically feasible managent option on drained peatlands? For Ecol Manag. 424:78–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.046
- Nuutinen T, Hirvelä H, Härkönen K, Hökkä H. 2004. Valtakunnan metsien 9. inventointiin perustuvat hakkuumahdollisuusarviot vuosille 2002–2031 Pohjois-Pohjanmaan metsäkeskuksen alueella. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja 3B/2004: 419–435.
- O’Hara K. 2014. Multi-aged silviculture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ojanen P, Minkkinen K, Penttilä T. 2013. The current greenhouse gas impact of forestry-drained boreal peatlands. For Ecol Manag. 289:201–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.10.008.
- Päivänen J. 2007. Suot ja Suometsät – Järkevän Käytön Perusteet [Peatlands and Peatland Forests – Fundamentals for Practical Management]. Metsäkustannus, Hämeenlinna, 368 p. [in Finnish].
- Päivänen J, Hånell B. 2012. Peatland ecology and forestry a sound approach. University of Helsinki Department of Forest Sciences Publication 3, Helsinki, Finland.
- Parkatti V-P. 2021. On the Economics of continuous and rotation forestry. Academic dissertation, University of Helsinki, Dissertationes Forestales 000. Publishers: Finnish Society of Forest Science, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki and School of Forest Sciences of the University of Eastern Finland.
- Parkatti V-P, Assmuth A, Rämö J, Tahvonen O. 2019. Economics of boreal conifer species in continuous cover and rotation forestry. Forest Policy Econ. 100:55–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.11.003.
- Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. 2009. Growth and yield models for uneven-sized forest stands in Finland. For Ecol Manag. 258:207–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2009.03.052
- Rondon XJ, Gorchov DL, Elliott SR. 2010. Assessment of economic sustainability of the strip clear-cutting system in the Peruvian Amazon. Forest Policy Econ. 12:340–348. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2010.02.004.
- Ruuska J, Siipilehto J, Valkonen S. 2008. Effect of edge stand on the development of young Pinus sylvestris stands in southern Finland. Scand J Forest Res. 23(3):214–226. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802098127
- Salminen H, Lehtonen M, Hynynen J. 2005. Reusing legacy FORTRAN in the MOTTI growth and yield simulator. Comput Electron Agr. 49:103–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.005.
- Sarkkola S, Hökkä H, Koivusalo H, Nieminen M, Ahti E, Päivänen J, Laine J. 2010. Role of tree standevapotranspiration in maintaining satisfactory drainage conditions in drained peatlands. Can J For Res. 40:1485–1496. doi: https://doi.org/10.1139/X10-084
- Sarkkola S, Nieminen M, Koivusalo H, Laurén A, Ahti E, Launiainen S, Nikinmaa E, Marttila H, Laine J, Hökkä H. 2013. Domination of growing-season evapotranspiration over runoff makes ditch network maintenance in mature peatland forests questionable. Mires Peat. 11:2. http://www.mires-and-peat.net/pages/volumes/map11/map1102.php
- Sarkkola S, Saarinen M. 2021. SuoPPP_Työpaketti 4: Taimettuminen (korpikuusikot sekä rämemänniköiden kaistalehakkuualat). Väliraportti. 5 p. (In Finnish).
- Serrano-León H, Ahtikoski A, Sonesson J, Fady B, Lindner M, Meredieu C, Raffin A, Perret S, Perot T, Orazio C. 2021. From genetic gain to economic gain: simulated growth and financial performance of genetically improved Pinus sylvestris and Pinus pinaster planted stands in France. Finland and Sweden. Forestry. 2021:1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpab004.
- Siipilehto J. 2006. Height distributions of Scots pine sapling stands affected by retained tree and edge stand competition. Silva Fenn. 40(3):473–486.
- Siipilehto J. 2009. Modelling stand structure in young Scots pine dominated stands. Forest Ecol Manage. 257:223–232. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2008.09.001
- Siipilehto J. 2011. Local prediction of stand structure using linear prediction theory in Scots pine-dominated stands in Finland. Silva Fenn. 45(4):669–692. doi: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.99
- Siipilehto J, Kangas A. 2015. Näslundin pituuskäyrä ja siihen perustuvia malleja läpimitta-pituus riippuvuudesta suomalaisissa talousmetsissä. [Näslund’s hight curve models for the dbh-height relationship in Finnish commercial forests]. Metsätieteen aikakauskirja. 6584. doi:https://doi.org/10.14214/ma.6584.
- Siipilehto J, Mehtätalo L. 2013. Parameter recovery vs. parameter prediction for the Weibull distribution validated for Scots pine stands in Finland. Silva Fenn. 47(4):1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1057
- Statistics Finland. 2021. Appendix table 3. Cost-of-living Index 1951:10 = 100. [accessed 2021 Apr 22]. https://www.stat.fi/til/khi/2021/03/khi_2021_03_2021-04-14_tau_003_en.html.
- Tahvonen O. 2011. Optimal structure and development of uneven-aged Norway spruce forests. Can J For Res. 41:2389–2402. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/X11-130.
- Tahvonen O, Pukkala T, Laiho O, Lähde E, Niinimäki S. 2010. Optimal management of uneven-aged Norway spruce stands. For Ecol Manag. 260:106–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2010.04.006.
- Tahvonen O, Rämö J. 2016. Optimality of continuous cover vs. clear-cut regimes in managing forest resources. Can J For Res. 46:891–901. doi:https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0474.
- Tosi JA. 1982. Sustained yield management of natural forests. San Jose, Costa Rica: Consultant Report for USAID/Peru. Tropical Science Center.
- Valkonen S. 1997. Viljelykuusikoiden alkukehtitysken malli. Metsätieteen Aikakauskirja - Folia Forestalia. 3/1997:321–347. [In Finnish with English summary.].
- Vitali V, Brang P, Cherubini P, Zingg A, Nikolova PS. 2016. Radial growth changes in Norway spruce montane and subalpine forests after strip cutting in the Swiss Alps. For Ecol Manag. 364:145–153. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.01.015.
- von Arnold K, Nilsson M, Hånell B, Weslien P, Klemedtsson L. 2005. Fluxes of CO2, CH4and N2O from drained organic soils in deciduous forests. Soil Biol Biochem. 37:1059–1071. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2004.11.004
- Wu H, Sharpe P, Walker J, Penridge L. 1985. Ecological field theory: a spatial analysis of resource interference among plants. Ecol Modell. 29:215–243. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3800(85)90054-7