Productivity and cost assessment of two harvesting methods for medium-rotation poplar plantations

References

• Abolina T, Volk T, Lazdina D. 2015. GIS based agricultural land availability assessment for the establishment of short rotation woody crops in Latvia. Biomass Bioenerg. 72:263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adebayo A, Han HS, Johnson L. 2007. Productivity and cost of cut-to-length and whole-tree harvesting in a mixed-conifer stand. For Prod J. 57:59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arcego H, Robert R, Brown R. 2019. Effect of log length on forestry loading and unloading. Floram. 26:6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belbo H, Vivestad H. 2018. Predicting delay factors when chipping wood at forest roadside landings. Int J For Eng. 29:128–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belisario A, Fiedler N, Cipriano de Assis do Carmo F, Lemos Moreira G. 2022. Influence of log length on the productivity of wood harvesting and transportation. Floresta. 51:17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Bergroth J, Palander T, Kärhä K. 2006. Excavator-based harvesters in wood cutting operations in Finland. For Stud. 45:74–88.
   Google Scholar
• Björheden R, Apel K, Shiba M, Thompson M. 1995. IUFRO forest work study nomenclature. Garpenberg: Swedish University of Agricultural Science, Dept. of Operational Efficiency. 16 p.
   Google Scholar
• Christersson L. 2008. Poplar plantations for paper and energy in the south of Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg. 32:997–1000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facciotto G, Bergante S, Rosso L, Minotta G. 2020. Comparison between two and five years rotation models in poplar, willow and black locust Short Rotation Coppices (SRC) in North West Italy. Ann Silvicult Res. 45:12–20.
   Google Scholar
• Gellestedt S, Dahilin B. 1999. Cut-to-Length: the next decade. J For Eng. 10:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Gingras JF, Favreau J. 2005. Effect of log length and number of products on the productivity of cut-to-length harvesting in the boreal forest. FERIC Adv. 6:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Grove PM, Conrad JL, Dahlen J. 2020. Volume and value recovery comparison of processor and conventional systems in pine stands of the U.S. South. Int J For Eng. 31:29–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gullberg T. 1995. Evaluating operator-machine interactions in comparative time studies. Int J For Eng. 7:51–61.
   Google Scholar
• Headlee W, Zalesny R. 2019. Allometric relationships for aboveground woody biomass differ among hybrid poplar genomic groups and clones in the North-Central USA. Bioenerg Res. 12:966–976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig D, Heil B, Leibing C, Röhle H, Kovàcs G. 2021. Comparison of the initial growth of different poplar clones on four sites in western Slovakia – preliminary results. Bioenerg Res. 14:374–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilman P. 1999. Planted forests: poplars. New For. 17:89–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPP. 2019. Biomass plantations in Poland. Accessed 8 May 2021. http://www.internationalpaper.com/company/regions/europe-middle-east-africa/sustainability/highlights/biomass-plantations-in-poland.
   Google Scholar
• Koŝir B, Magagnotti N, Spinelli R. 2015. The role of work studies in forest engineering: status and perspectives. Int J For Eng. 26:160–170.
   Google Scholar
• Krejza J, Světlìk J, Bednář P. 2017. Allometric relationship and biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for above- and below-ground biomass prediction and stem volume estimation for ash (Fraxinus excelsior L. and oak Quercus robur L.). Trees. 31:1303–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latterini F, Stefanoni W, Alfano V, Palmieri N, Mattei P, Pari L. 2022. Assessment of working performance and costs of two small-scale harvesting systems for medium rotation poplar plantations. Forests. 13:569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonello EC, Gonçalves SP, Fenner PT. 2012. Efeito do tempo de experiência de operadores de harvester no rendimento operacional. Rev. Árvore. 36:1129–1133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis LT, Kizha AR. 2021. Wood biomass recovery costs under different harvesting methods and market conditions. Int J For Eng. 32:164–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundbäck M, Häggström C, Nordfjell T. 2021. Worldwide trends in methods for harvesting and extracting industrial roundwood. Int J For Eng. 32:202–215.
   Google Scholar
• Magagnotti N, Spinelli R, Kärhä K, Mederski P. 2021. Multi-tree cut-to-length harvesting of short-rotation poplar plantations. Eur J Forest Res. 140:345–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakagawa M, Hamatsu J, Saitou T, Ishida H. 2007. Effect of tree size on productivity and time required for work elements in selective thinning by a harvester. Int J For Eng. 18:24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Nurminen T, Korpunen H, Uusitalo J. 2006. Time consumption analysis of the mechanizd cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fenn. 40:335–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okagbue H, Oguntunde P, Obasi E, Akhmetshin E. 2021. Trends and usage pattern of SPSS and Minitab software in scientific research. J Phys Conf Ser. 1734:012017.
   Google Scholar
• Petty A, Kärhä K. 2014. Productivity and cost evaluations of energy-wood and pulpwood harvesting systems in first thinnings. Int J For Eng. 25:37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Purfürst T, Erler J. 2011. The human influence on productivity in harvester operations. Int J For Eng. 22:15–22.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenqvist H, Roos A, Ling E, Hektor B. 2000. Willow growers in Sweden. Biomass Bioenerg. 18:137–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutherford A. 2000. Introducing ANOVA and ANCOVA: a GLM approach. London: Sage Publications Ltd. 192 p. ISBN 0 7619 5160 1.
   Google Scholar
• Scott A. 1973. Work measurement: observed time to standard time. In: Wittering W, editor. Work study in forestry. Forestry Commission Bulletin n. 47, H.M. Stationery Office, London, UK; p. 26–39.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, de Arruda ACM. 2019. Productivity and utilization benchmarks for chain flail delimber-debarker-chippers used in fast-growing plantations. Croat J For Eng. 40:65–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Kovac B, Heger P, Heilig D, Heil B, Kovàcs G, Magagnotti N. 2022b. Manipulating grading strategy for the efficient harvesting of industrial poplar plantations. Int J For Eng. 33:98–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Kovac B, Heger P, Heilig D, Magagnotti N. 2022c. First trial of a prototype chain-flail delimber for the European short rotation poplar plantations. Eur J For Res Preprint. DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1518173/v1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Magagnotti N. 2010. Comparison of two harvesting systems for the production of forest biomass from the thinning of Picea abies plantations. Scand J For Res. 25:69–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, De Francesco F, Kovac B, Kovàcs G, Heger P, Heil B, Heilig D, Zemanek T. 2022a. Cut-to-length harvesting options for the integrated harvesting of the European industrial poplar plantations. Forests 13(9). DOI:10.3390/f13091478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Magagnotti N, Lombardini C, Leonello EC. 2021. Cost-effective integrated harvesting of short-rotation poplar plantations. Bioenerg Res. 14:460–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Visser R. 2008. Analyzing and estimating delays in harvester operations. Int J For Eng. 19:35–40.
   Google Scholar
• Spinelli R, Visser R. 2009. Analyzing and estimating delays in wood chipping operations. Biomass Bioenerg. 33:429–433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli RO, Ward SM, Tornero M. 2004. Comparison of short-wood forwarding systems used in Iberia. Silva Fenn. 1:85–94.
   Google Scholar
• Stanton B, Eaton J, Johnson J, Rice D, Schuette B, Moser B. 2002. Hybrid poplar in the pacific northwest: the effects of market-driven management. J For. 100:28–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tullus A, Rytter L, Tullus T, Weih M, Tullus H. 2012. Short-rotation forestry with hybrid aspen (Populus tremula L. × P. tremuloides Michx.) in Northern Europe. Scand J For Res. 27:10–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, LeDoux CB, Vanderberg M, McNeel J. 2004. Log damage and value loss associated with two ground-based harvesting systems in Central Appalachia. Int J For Eng. 15:61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Werner C, Haas E, Grote R, Gauder M, Graeff-Höonninger S, Claupein W, Butterbach-Bahl K. 2012. Biomass production potential from Populus short rotation systems in Romania. GCB Bioenerg. 4:642–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiedenbeck J, Scholl M, Blankenhorn P, Ray C. 2017. Lumber volume and value recovery from small-diameter black cherry, sugar maple, and red oak logs. BioRes. 12(1):853–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar