Cost-efficient forest management for safeguarding Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) habitats in Central Finland

References

• Ahtikoski A, Laitila J, Hilli A, Päätalo M-L. 2021. Profitability of the first commercial thinning, a simulation study in northern Finland. Forests. 12:1389. doi:10.3390/f12101389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Äijälä O, Koistinen A, Sved J, Vanhatalo K, Väisänen P. 2019. Metsänhoidon suositukset [Silvicultural guidelines] (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Asbjornsen H, Wand Y, Ellison D, Ashcraft CM, Atallah SS, Mayer A, Altamirano M, Yu P. 2022. Multi-targeted payments for the balanced management of hydrological and other forest ecosystem services. Forest Ecol Manag. 522(2022):120482. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2022.120482.
   Google Scholar
• Barth R, Meyer M, Spitzner J. 2012. Typical pitfalls of simulation modelling – lessons learned from armed forces and business. J Artif Soc Soc Simul. 15(2):5. http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/15/2/5.html.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diffendorfer JE, Gaines MS, Holt RD. 1995. Habitat fragmentation and movements of three small mammals (Sigmodon, Microtus, and Peromyscus). Ecology. 76:827–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diniz MF, Cushman SA, Machado RB, Júnior PDM. 2020. Landscape connectivity modeling from the perspective of animal dispersal. Landsc Ecol. 35:41–58. doi:10.1007/s10980-019-00935-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. 2018. ArcGIS desktop: release 10.6. Redlands, CA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2006. EU biodiversity action plan. Halting the loss of biodiversity by 2010 – and beyond – sustaining ecosystem services for human well-being. [accessed 2012 March 21]. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/biodiversity/comm2006/index_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2011. Our life insurance, our natural capital: an EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM/2011/244 final. Brussels, 3.5.2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2015. The mid-term review of the EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. COM/2015/0478 final. Brussels, 2.10.2015.
   Google Scholar
• Finnish forest statistics. 2020. Peltola, A. (Editor-in-chief), Räty, M., Sauvula-Seppälä, T., Torvelainen, J., Uotila, E., Vaahtera, E. and Ylitalo, E. (Eds.) 198 pages. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:978-952-380-107-3.
   Google Scholar
• Haakana H, Hirvelä H, Hanski IK, Packalen T. 2017. Comparing regional forest policy scenarios in terms of predicted suitable habitats for the Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans). Scand J Forest Res. 32(2):185–195. doi:10.1080/02827581.2016.1221991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haikarainen S, Huuskonen S, Ahtikoski A, Lehtonen M, Salminen H, Siipilehto J, Korhonen KT, Hynynen J, Routa J. 2021. Does juvenile stand management matter? Regional scenarios of the long-term effects on wood production. Forests. 12(1):17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski IK. 1998. Home ranges and habitat use in the declining flying squirrel Pteromys volans in managed forests. Wildlife Biol. 4:33–46. doi:10.2981/wlb.1998.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanski IK, Stevens PC, Ihalempiä P, Selonen V. 2000. Home-range size, movements, and nest-size use in the Siberian flying squirrel, Pteromys Volans. J Mamm. 81:798–809.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hökkä H, Salminen H, Ahtikoski A, Kojola S, Launiainen S, Lehtonen M. 2017. Long-term impact of ditch network maintenance on timber production, profitability and environmental loads at regional level – a simulation study. Forestry. 90(2):234–246. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpw045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horne P, Boxall PC, Adamowicz WL. 2005. Multiple-use management of forest recreation sites: a spatially explicit choice experiment. Forest Ecol Manag. 207:189–199. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurme E, Mönkkönen M, Nikula A, Nivala V, Reunanen P, Heikkinen T, Ukkola M. 2005. Building and evaluating predictive occupancy models for the Siberian flying squirrel using forest planning data. Forest Ecol Manag. 216:241–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J, Salminen H, Ahtikoski A, Huuskonen S, Ojansuu R, Siipilehto J, Lehtonen M, Eerikäinen K. 2015. Long-term impacts of forest management on biomass supply and forest resource development: a scenario analysis for Finland. Europ J Forest Res. 134:415–431. doi:10.1007/s10342-014-0860-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hynynen J, Salminen H, Huuskonen S, Ahtikoski A, Ojansuu R, Siipilehto J, Lehtonen M, Rummukainen A, Kojola S, Eerikäinen K. 2014. Scenario analysis for the biomass supply potential and the future development of Finnish forest resources. Working Papers of the Finnish Forest Research Institute 302. http://www.metla.fi/julkaisut/workingpapers/2014/mwp302.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsen JB, Vedel SE, Thorsen BJ. 2013. Assessing costs of multifunctional NATURA 2000 management restrictions in continuous cover beech forest management. Forestry. 2013(86):575–582. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpt023.
   Google Scholar
• Jokinen M, Hanski I, Numminen E, Valkama J, Selonen V. 2019. Promoting species protection with predictive modelling: effect of habitat, predators and climate on the occurrence of the Siperian flying squirrel. Biol Conserv. 230:37–46. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2018.12.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juutinen A, Ahtikoski A, Lehtonen M, Mäkipää R, Ollikainen M. 2018. The impact of a short-term carbon payment scheme on forest management. Forest Policy Econ. 90(2018):115–127. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2018.02.005.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Gosling E, Paul C. 2020. Use and miuse of the net present value in environmental studies. Ecol Econ. 174(2020):106664. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106664.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Moog M. 2005. Timber harvesting versus forest reserves – producer prices for open-use areas in German beech forests (Fagus sylvatica L.). Ecol Econ. 52:97–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koivisto M. 2017. Pitfalls in modelling and simulation. 6th Internat. Young Scientists Conference in HPC and simulation, YSC 2017, 1-3 Nov. 2017, Kotka, Finland. Proc Comput Sci. 119 (2017):8–15. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2017.11.154.
   Google Scholar
• Kurttila M, Pukkala T, Loikkanen J. 2002. The performance of alternative spatial objective types in forest planning calculations: a case for flying squirrel and moose. Forest Ecol Manag. 166(2002):245–260.
   Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T. 2009. Forest management and biodiversity conservation based on natural ecosystem dynamics in Northern Europe: the complexity challenge. Ambio. 38:309–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuuluvainen T, Tahvonen O, Aakala T. 2012. Even-aged and uneven-aged forest management in Boreal Fennoscandia: a review. Ambio. 7:720–737.
   Google Scholar
• Lampila S, Kvist L, Wistbacka R, Orell M. 2009. Genetic diversity and population differentiation in the endangered Siberian flying squirrel (Pteromys volans) in a fragmented landscape. Europ J Wildl Res. 55:397–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappi J, Lempinen R. 2014. A linear programming algorithm and software for forest-level planning problems including factories. Scand J Forest Res. 29(Suppl. 1):178–184. doi:10.1080/02827581.2014.886714.
   Google Scholar
• Liukko UM, Henttonen H, Hanski IK, Kauhala K, Kojola I, Kyheröinen EM. 2016. The 2015 red list of Finnish mammal species. Helsinki: Finnish Environment Institute. http://hdl.handle.net/10138/159434.
   Google Scholar
• Lovrić M, Da Re R, Vidale E, Prokofieva I, Wong J, Pettenella D, Verkerk PJ, Mavsar R. 2020. Non-wood forest products in Europe – A quantitative overview. For Policy Econ. 116(2020):102175. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102175.
   Google Scholar
• Mäkeläinen S, Schrader M, Hanski IK. 2015. Factors explaining the occurance of the Siberian flying squirrel in urban forest landscape. Urban Ecosyst. 18:223–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margules CR, Pressey RL. 2000. Systematic conservation planning. Nature. 405:243–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michon S. 2014. Comparison of tree cavity abundance and characteristics in managed and unmanaged Swedish boreal forest. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences. Faculty of Forest Science. Examensarbete i ämnet bioogi 2014:13. 26 p. https://stud.epsilon.slu.se/7417/7/michon_s_141015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Mortelliti A, Amori G, Capizzi D, Cervone C, Fagiani S, Pollini B, Boitani L. 2011. Independent effects of habitat loss, habitat fragmentation and structural connectivity on the distribution of two arboreal rodents. J Appl Ecol. 48:163–172.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mota M, Flores I. 2020. Revisiting the flaws and pitfalls using simulation in the analysis of aviation capacity problems. Case Stud Transp Policy. 8(2020):67–75. doi:10.1016/j.cstp.2018.03.004.
   Google Scholar
• Official Statistics of Finland. 2017. Consumer price index [e-publication]. January 2017, Appendix table 3. Cost-of-living Index 1951:10=100. [accessed 15 November 2018]. http://www.stat.fi/til/khi/2017/01/khi_2017_01_2017-02-20_tau_003_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Pimm SL, Jenkins CN, Abell R, Brooks TM, Gittleman JL, Joppa LN, Raven P, Roberts CM, Sexton JO. 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science. 344:1246752. doi:10.1126/science.1246752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rassi P, Hyvärinen E, Juslén A, Mannerkoski I. 2010. The 2010 Red List of Finnish species, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio A, Schulman A, Kontula T. 2008. Suomen luontotyyppien uhanalaisuus. [Threatened biotypes in Finland] (In Finnish).
   Google Scholar
• Remm J, Hanski I, Tuominen S, Selonen V. 2017. Multilevel landscape utilization of the Siberian flying squirrel: scale effects on species habitat use. Ecol Evol. 7(20):8303–8315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reunanen P, Mönkkönen M, Nikula A. 2002. Habitat requirements of the Siberian flying squirrel in northern Finland: comparing field survey and remote sensing data. Ann Zool Fenn. 39:7–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reunanen P, Mönkkönen M, Nikula A, Hurme E, Nivala V. 2004. Assessing landscape thresholds for the Siberian flying squirrel. Ecol Bull. 51:277–286.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie LE, Betts MG, Forbes G, Vernes K. 2009. Effect of landscape composition and configuration on northern flying squirrels in a forest mosaic. Forest Ecol Manag. 257:1920–1929. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.01.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salminen H, Lehtonen M, Hynynen J. 2005. Reusing legacy FORTRAN in the MOTTI growth and yield simulator. Comput Electr Agric. 49:103–113. doi:10.1016/j.compag.2005.02.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangeli A, Hanski IK, Mäkelä H. 2013b. Integrating multi-source forest inventory and animal survey data to assess nationwide distribution and habitat correlates of the Siberian flying squirrel. Biol Conserv. 157:31–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santangeli A, Wistbacka R, Hanski IK, Laaksonen T. 2013a. Ineffective enforced legislation for nature conservation: a case with Siperian flying squirrel and forestry in a boreal landscape. Biol Conserv. 157:237–244. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2012.09.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmiegelow FKA, Mönkkönen M. 2002. Habitat loss and fragmentation in dynamic landscapes: avian perspectives from the boreal forest. Ecol Appl. 12:375–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schtickzelle N, Mennechez G, Baguette M. 2006. Dispersal depression with habitat fragmentation in the bog fritillary butterfly. Ecology. 87:1057–1065.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Hanski IK. 2003. Movements of the flying squirrel Pteromys volans in corridors and in matrix habitat. Ecography. 26:641–651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Hanski IK. 2004. Young flying squirrels (Pteromys volans) dispersing in fragmented forests. Beh Ecol. 15:564–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Hanski IK. 2006. Habitat exploration and use in dispersing juvenile flying squirrels. J Anim Ecol. 75:1440–1449. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2006.01168.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Mäkeläinen S. 2017. Ecology and protection of a flagship species, the Siperian flying squirrel. Hystrix. 28(2):134–146. doi:10.4404/hystrix-28.2-12328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Wistbacka R. 2016. Siberian flying squirrels do not anticipate future resource abundance. BMC Ecol. 16:51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selonen V, Wistbacka R, Korpimäki E. 2016. Food abundance and weather modify reproduction of two arboreal squirrel species. J Mamm. 97:1376–1384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MJ, Betts MG, Forbes GJ, Kehler DG, Bourgeois MC, Flemming SP. 2011. Independent effects of connectivity predict homing success by northern flying squirrel in a forest mosaic. Landsc Ecol. 26(5):709–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith MJ, Forbes GJ, Betts MG. 2013. Landscape configuration influences gap-crossing decisions of northern flying squirrel (Glaucomys sabrinus). Biol Conserv. 168:176–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonteri T, Hotanen J-P, Kuusipalo J. 1990. The Finnish forest site type approach: ordination and classification studies of mesic forest sites in southern Finland. Vegetation. 87:85–98.
   Google Scholar
• Trapp SE, Day CC, Flaherty EA, Zollner PA, Smith WP. 2019. Modeling impacts of landscape connectivity on dispersal movements of northern flying squirrels (Gaucomys sabrinus griseifrons). Ecol Model. 394:44–52. doi:10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2018.12.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yemshanov D, Haight RG, Liu N, Parisien M-A, Barber Q, Koch FH, Burton C, Mansuy N, Campioni F, Choudhury S. 2020. Assessing the trade-offs between timber supply and wildlife protection goals in boreal landscapes. Can J Forest Res. 50(2020):243–258. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2019-0234.
   Google Scholar
• Vaezin SMH, Marage D, Garcia S. 2022. Cost-effectiveness of Natura 2000 forest contracts for biodiversity conservation. Can J Forest Res. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2021-0204.
   Google Scholar
• Wistbacka R, Orell M, Santangeli A. 2018. The tragedy of the science-policy gap – revised legislation fails to protect an endangered species in a managed boreal landscape. Forest Ecol Manag. 422:172–178. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2018.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar