Growth rate and economic evaluation of mixed stands established with Cedrus libani and Pinus nigra

References

• Akgül E, Yılmaz A. 1987. Doğal yayılış alanları dışında yapılan ağaçlandırmalarda yörenin ekolojik özellikleri ile Toros Sedirinin (Cedrus libani A. Richard) gelişimi arasındaki ilişkiler. OAE Teknik Bülten Serisi. 188, 52 p., Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Armsworth PR, Roughgarden JE. 2001. An invitation to ecological economics. Trends Ecol Evol. 16(5):229–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayan S, Yer EN, Gülseven O. 2017. Türkiye’deki Toros sediri (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) ağaçlandırma sahalarının iklim tipi açısından değerlendirilmesi. Artvin Çoruh Univ Orman Fak Derg. 18(2):152–161.
   Google Scholar
• Ayan S, Yücedağ C, Simovski B. 2021. A major tool for afforestation of semi-arid and anthropogenic steppe areas in Turkey: Pinus nigra J.F. Arnold subsp. pallasiana (Lamb.) Holmboe. J For Sci. 67(10):449–463. https://doi.org/10.17221/74/2021-JFS.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aydın AC. 2008. Antalya İli Sedir ormanlarında polimorfik yöntemle meşcere verim gücünün saptanması, KTU Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Y. Trabzon: Lisans Tezi.
   Google Scholar
• Baeten L, Bruelheide H, van der Plas F, Kambach S, Ratcliffe S, Jucker T, … Bauhus J. 2019. Identifying the tree species compositions that maximize ecosystem functioning in European forests. J Appl Ecol. 56(3):733–744.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bariteau M, Ferandes P. 1990. L’Amelioration des Cedrus en France. In: Proceedings of the International Cedar Symposium, October 22–27, 1990, Antalya, Ormancılık Araş. Enst. Muhtelif Yayınlar (Ankara) 59, 366–378.
   Google Scholar
• Bauhus J, Forrester DI, Pretzsch H. 2017. Mixed-species forests: the development of a forest management paradigm. In: Mixed-species forests. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; p. 1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Berger TW, Inselsbacher E, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. 2010. Carbon dioxide emissions of soils under pure and mixed stands of beech and spruce, affected by decomposing foliage litter mixtures. Soil Biol Biochem. 42:986–997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boydak M. 1996. Ecology and sylviculture of Cedar of Lebanon (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) and conservation of its naturel forest. Ankara: Ministry of Forestry.
   Google Scholar
• Boydak M. 2003. Regeneration of Lebanon cedar (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) on karstic lands in Turkey. For Ecol Manag. 178(3):231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çepel N. 1978. Orman Ekolojisi, Ders kitabı (Vol. 257). İstanbul: İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Yayını.
   Google Scholar
• Chen HY, Klinka K. 2003. Aboveground productivity of western hemlock and western redcedar mixed-species stands in southern coastal British Columbia. For Ecol Manag. 184(1-3):55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cicşa A, Tudoran GM, Dobre AC, Spârchez G. 2022. Effect of species composition on growth and yield in mixed beech–coniferous stands. Forests. 13(10):1651.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coll L, Ameztegui A, Collet C, Löf M, Mason B, Pach M, … Bielak K. 2018. Knowledge gaps about mixed forests: What do European forest managers want to know and what answers can science provide? For Ecol Manag. 407:106–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drever C, Peterson G, Messier C, et al. 2006. Can forest management based on natural disturbances maintain ecological resilience? Can J For Res. 36:2285–2299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durkaya A, Durkaya B, Makineci E, Orhan I. 2015. Aboveground biomass and carbon storage relationship of Turkish pines. Fresenius Environ Bull. 24(11):3573–3583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkan N. 1997. Elazığ ve çevresindeki karaçam ağaçlandırmaları için hacım tablosu, Güneydoğu Anadolu Ormancılık Araştırma Müdürlüğü. Dergisi. 1:61–72.
   Google Scholar
• Erkan N, Aydın AC. 2016. Effects of spacing on early growth rate and carbon sequestration in Pinus brutia Ten. plantations. For Sys. 25(2):e064.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkan N, Çömez A, Aydın AC, Denli Ö, Erkan S. 2018. Litterfall in relation to stand parameters and climatic factors in Pinus brutia forests in Turkey. Scand J For Res. 33(4):338–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2017.1406135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2010. Global forest resources assessment. FAO for pap 163:350. ISBN: 978-925-106654-6.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester DI, Ammer C, Annighöfer PJ, Barbeito I, Bielak K, Bravo Oviedo A, Hurt V. 2018. Effects of crown architecture and stand structure on light absorption in mixed and monospecific Fagus sylvatica and Pinus sylvestris forests along a productivity and climate gradient through Europe. J Ecol. 106(2):746–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamfeldt L, Snäll T, Bagchi R. 2013. Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun. 4:1340. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms2328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griess VC, Knoke T. 2013. Bioeconomic modeling of mixed Norway spruce—European beech stands: economic consequences of considering ecological effects. Eur J For Res. 132:511–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güner ŞT, Çömez A. 2017. Biomass equations and changes in carbon stock in afforested black pine (Pinus nigra Arnold. subsp. pallasiana (lamb.) Holmboe) stands in Turkey. Fresenius Environ Bull. 26(3):2368–2379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms WR, Whitesell CD, DeBell DS. 2000. Growth and development of loblolly pine in a spacing trial planted in Hawaii. For Ecol Manage. 126:13–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Qin L, Li Z, Liang X, Shao M, Tan L. 2013. Carbon storage capacity of monoculture and mixed-species plantations in subtropical China. For Ecol Manag. 295:193–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertzog LR, Vandegehuchte ML, Dekeukeleire D, Dekoninck W, De Smedt P, van Schrojenstein Lantman I, Proesmans W, Baeten L, Bonte D, Martel A, Verheyen K. 2021. Mixing of tree species is especially beneficial for biodiversity in fragmented landscapes, without compromising forest functioning. J Appl Ecol. 58(12):2903–2913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber MO, Sterba H, Bernhard L. 2014. Site conditions and definition of compositional proportion modify mixture effects in Picea abies–Abies alba stands. Can J For Res. 44(10):1281–1291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husch B, Miller CI, Beers TW. 1982. Forest mensuration. 3rd ed. Florida: Krieger Pub. Company. 402 pp.
   Google Scholar
• IPCC. 2006. IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, In: IGES, Japan (Eds.: Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T and Tanabe K). http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/index (Accessed 15 June 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Jactel H, Brockerhoff EG. 2007. Tree diversity reduces herbivory by forest insects. Ecol Lett. 10:835–848. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01073.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karataş R, Çömez A, Güner ŞT. 2017. Sedir (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) ağaçlandırma alanlarında karbon stoklarının belirlenmesi. Orman Araşt Derg. 4(2):107–120.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke T. 2017. Economics of mixed forests. In: Pretzsch H, Forrester DI, Bauhus J, editor. Mixed-species forests. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54553-9_11
   Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Ammer C, Stimm B, Mosandl R. 2008. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur J For Res. 127:89–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-007-0186-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambin EF, Turner BL, Geist HJ, Agbola SD, Angelsen A, Bruce JW, … Xuet J. 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Glob Environ Chang. 11:261–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindén M, Agestam E. 2003. Increment and yield in mixed and monoculture stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies based on an experiment in southern Sweden. Scand J For Res. 18(2):155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matala J, Kellomaki S, Nuutinen T. 2008. Litterfall in relation to volume growth of trees: analysis based on literature. Scand J For Res. 23(3):194–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580802036176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer H, Sevim M. 1959. Lübnan Sediri, Lübnan’daki 5000 yıllık tahribatı, Anadolu’da bugünkü yayılış sahası ve bu ağaç türünün Alplere tekrar getirilmesi hakkında düşünceler (Çeviren: Necmettin Çepel). İstanbul Üniversitesi Orman Fakültesi Dergisi. Seri B, Cilt XI, Sayı II: 111-142, İstanbul.
   Google Scholar
• Messinger J, Güney A, Zimmermann R, Ganser B, Bachmann M, Remmele S, Aas G. 2015. Cedrus libani: a promising tree species for Central European forestry facing climate change? Eur J For Res. 134(6):1005–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MGM. 2022. https://mgm.gov.tr/veridegerlendirme/il-ve-ilceler-istatistik.aspx?k=A&m=ELAZIG (Accessed 8 November 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Mısır N. 2003. Karaçam ağaçlandırmalarına ilişkin büyüme modelleri. K.T.Ü. Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Doktora Tezi. 209 Sayfa, Trabzon.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols JD, Bristow M, Vanclay JK. 2006. Mixed-species plantations: prospects and challenges. For Ecol Manag. 233(2-3):383–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pach M, Sansone D, Ponette Q, Barreiro S, Mason B, Bravo-Oviedo A, … Corona P. 2018. Silviculture of mixed forests: a European overview of current practices and challenges. In: Dynamics, silviculture and management of mixed forests. p. 185–253.
   Google Scholar
• Pearce D, Putz FE, Vanclay JK. 2003. Sustainable forestry in the tropics: panacea or folly? For Ecol Manag. 172:229–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H. 2018. Growth and structure in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures: review and perspectives. In: Dynamics, Silviculture and Management of Mixed Forests. p. 131–183.
   Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Biber P. 2016. Tree species mixing can increase maximum stand density. Can J For Res. 46(10):1179–1193.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Bielak K, Block J, Bruchwald A, Dieler J, Ehrhart HP, … Zingg A. 2013. Productivity of mixed versus pure stands of oak (Quercus petraea (Matt) Liebl and Quercus robur L) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L) along an ecological gradient. Eur J For Res. 132(2):263–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Steckel M, Heym M, Biber P, Ammer C, Ehbrecht M, … Vast F. 2020. Stand growth and structure of mixed-species and monospecific stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and oak (Q. robur L., Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.) analysed along a productivity gradient through Europe. Eur J For Res. 139(3):349–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretzsch H, Zenner EK. 2017. Toward managing mixed-species stands: from parametrization to prescription. For Ecosyst. 4:19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40663-017-0105-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Miina J, Kurttila M, Kolström T. 1998. A spatial yield model for optimizing the thinning regime of mixed stands of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies. Sand J For Res. 13(1–4):31–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riera P, Signorello G, Thiene M, Mahieu PA, Navrud S, Kaval P, Rulleau B, Mavsar R, Madureira L, Meyerhoff J, Elsasser P. 2012. Non-market valuation of forest goods and services: good practice guidelines. J For Econ. 18(4):259–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riofrío J, del Río M, Bravo F. 2016. Mixing effects on growth efficiency in mixed pine forests. Forestry. 90:381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Río MD, Pretzsch H, Alberdi I, Bielak K, Bravo F, Brunner A, … Bravo-Oviedo A. 2018. Characterization of mixed forests. In: Dynamics, silviculture and management of mixed forests. p. 27–71.
   Google Scholar
• Röhrig E, Bartsch N, von Lüpke B. 2006. Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage. Stuttgart: Eugen Ulmer. p 479.
   Google Scholar
• Saatçioğlu F. 1976. Silvikültürün biyolojik esasları ve prensipleri (Silvikültür I), İ.Ü. Orman Fakültesi Yayınları. No:2187/222.
   Google Scholar
• Sedjo RA. 2001. From foraging to cropping: the transition to plantation forestry, and implications for wood supply and demand. Unasylva. 52:204.
   Google Scholar
• Spiecker H. 2003. Silvicultural management in maintaining biodiversity and resistance of forests in Europe-temperate zone. J Environ Manag. 67:55–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4797(02)00188-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SPSS v.22.0®. 2015. Spss 22.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Sun O, Eren ME, Orpak M. 1977. Temel Ağaç Türlerimizde Tek Ağaç ve Birim Alandaki Odun Çeşidi Oranlarının Saptanması TUBİTAK Yayını. Ankara.
   Google Scholar
• Trasobares A, Pukkala T. 2004. Optimising the management of uneven-aged Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus nigra Arn. Mixed stands in Catalonia, north-East Spain. Ann For Sci. 61:747–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urgoiti Otazua J, Paquette A. 2018. Mixed forest plantations. In: Dynamics, silviculture and management of mixed forests. p. 319–341.
   Google Scholar
• Vallet P, Perot T. 2016. Tree diversity effect on dominant height in temperate forest. For Ecol Manag. 381:106–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsta L, Jacobsen JB. 2018. Optimizing the Management of European Mixed Forests. In: Bravo-Oviedo A., Pretzsch H., del Río M., editor. Dynamics, silviculture and management of mixed forests. Managing Forest Ecosystems (Vol 31). Cham: Springer; p. 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91953-9_11
   Google Scholar
• Van Laar A, Akça A. 2007. Forest mensuration (Vol. 13). Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Xiang Y, Li Y, Luo X, Liu Y, Huang P, Yao B, Zhang L, Li W, Xue J, Gao H, Li Y. 2022. Mixed plantations enhance more soil organic carbon stocks than monocultures across China: Implication for optimizing afforestation/reforestation strategies. Sci Total Environ. 821:153449.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yıldızbakan A, Saraçoğlu Ö, Akgün C, Aydın AC. 2012. Sedir (Cedrus libani A. Rich.) meşcerelerinin hacim artımını maksimize eden optimum kuruluşlar. Doğu Akdeniz Ormancılık Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Teknik Bülten, (43).
   Google Scholar
• Zhou G, Guan L, Wei X, Zhang D, Zhang Q, Yan J, … Yu Q. 2006. Litterfall production along successional and altitudinal gradients of subtropical monsoon evergreen broadleaved forests in Guangdong, China. Plant Ecol. 188:77–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-006-9149-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar