Comparing stand growth models in optimizing mixed-species forest management

References

• Äijälä O, Koistinen A, Sved J, Vanhatalo K, Väisänen P. 2019. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset. The forestry development center tapio. Helsinki: Finland. [In Finnish.].
   Google Scholar
• Bollandsås OM, Buongiorno J, Gobakken T. 2008. Predicting the growth of stands of trees of mixed species and size: a matrix model for Norway. Scand J For Res. 23(2):167–178. doi:10.1080/02827580801995315.
   Google Scholar
• Bullard SH, Sheraldi HD, Klemperer WD. 1985. Estimating optimal thinning and rotation for mixed-species timber stands using a random search algorithm. Forest Sci. 31:303–315. doi:10.1093/forestscience/31.2.303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buongiorno J, Zhou M. 2015. Adaptive economic and ecological forest management under risk. For Ecosyst. 2(4):1–15. doi:10.1186/s40663-015-0030-y.
   Google Scholar
• Buongiorno J, Zhou M. 2017. Multicriteria forest decisionmaking under risk with goal-programming markov decision process models. For Sci. 63(5):474–484. doi:10.5849/FS-2016-078R2.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021a. Communication from the commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. COM/2021/572 final. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0572. [Accessed 2.2.2023].
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021b. EU taxonomy compass. https://ec.europa.eu/sustainable-finance-taxonomy/activities/activity/143/view. [Accessed 2.2.2023].
   Google Scholar
• Fagerberg N, Lohmander P, Eriksson O, Olsson J-O, Poudel BC, Bergh J. 2022. Evaluation of individual-tree growth models for Picea abies based on a case study of an uneven-sized stand in southern Sweden. Scand J Forest Res. 37(1):45–58. doi:10.1080/02827581.2022.2037700.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FAO. 2020. The food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. Statistics. available at: https://www.fao.org/forest-resources-assessment/fra-2020/country-reports/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Act 1085. 2013. Laki metsälain muuttamisesta. Available from: https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2013/20131085.
   Google Scholar
• Forest Europe. 2020. State of Europe’s Forests 2020. https://foresteurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/SoEF_2020.pdf. [Accessed 02.02.2023].
   Google Scholar
• Haight R, Getz W. 1987. Fixed and equilibrium endpoint problems in uneven-aged stand management. For Sci. 33:908–931. doi:10.1093/forestscience/33.4.908.
   Google Scholar
• Haight R, Monserud R. 1990a. Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands. I. Performance of a coordinate-search process. Can J For Res. 20(1):15–25. doi:10.1139/x90-003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haight R, Monserud R. 1990b. Optimizing any-aged management of mixed-species stands. II. Effects of decision criteria. For. Sci. 36:125–144. doi:10.1093/forestscience/36.1.125.
   Google Scholar
• Heinonen J. 1994. Koealojen puu- ja puustotunnusten laskentaohjelma KPL. Käyttöohje. Research Reports. Finnish Forest Research Institute 504. http://urn.fi/URN:ISBN:951-40-1369-7. [In Finnish.].
   Google Scholar
• Hertog IM, Brogaard S, Karuse T. 2022. Barriers to expanding continuous cover forestry in Sweden for delivering multiple ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv. 53:101392. doi:10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joelsson K, Hjältén J, Work T, Gibb H, Roberge J-M, Löfroth T. 2017. Uneven-aged silviculture can reduce negative effects of forest management on beetles. For Ecol Manag. 391:436–445. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2017.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Axelsson E, Girona M, Senior J. 2021. Continuous-cover forestry maintains soil fungal communities in Norway spruce dominated boreal forests. For Ecol Manag. 480:118659. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knoke T, Kindu M, Jarisch I, Gosling E, Friedrich S, Bödeker K, Paul K. 2020. How considering multiple criteria, uncertainty scenarios and biological interactions may influence the optimal silvicultural strategy for a mixed forest. For Pol Econ. 118:102239. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malo P, Tahvonen O, Suominen A, Philipp B, Viitasaari L. 2021. Reinforcement learning in optimizing forest management. Can J For Res. 51:1393–1409. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2020-0447.
   Google Scholar
• Mason W, Diaci J, Carvalho J, Valkonen S. 2021. Continuous cover forestry in Europe: usage and the knowledge gaps and challenges to wider adoption. Forestry. 95:1–12. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpab038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morin X, Fahse L, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Bugmann H. 2011. Tree species richness promotes productivity in temperate forests through strong complementarity between species. Ecol Lett. 14:1211–1219. doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01691.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Institute Finland. 2014. Luke’s statistics services. https://stat.luke.fi/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Natural Resources Institute Finland. 2020. Asiantuntijalausunto. KAA 9/2019 vp Lakialoite avohakkuiden lopettamiseksi valtion mailla. [Expert statement. KAA 9/2019 vp initiative to stop clearcuts on state owned lands.] https://www.luke.fi/sites/default/files/migration_wp/20201023_MmV_Avohakkuukielto_Luken-lausunto.pdf [Accessed 2.2.2023]. [In Finnish.].
   Google Scholar
• Niinimäki S, Tahvonen O, Mäkelä A. 2012. Applying a process-based model in Norway spruce management. For Ecol Manag. 265:102–115. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.10.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nurminen T, Korpunen H, Uusitalo J. 2006. Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fenn. 40(2):335–363. doi:10.14214/sf.346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkatti V-P, Tahvonen O. 2020. Optimizing continuous cover and rotation forestry in mixed-species boreal forests. Can J For Res. 50:1138–1151. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2020-0056.
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Finland. 2019. Lakialoite avohakkuiden lopettamiseksi valtion mailla. KAA 9/2019 vp. [Bill to stop clearcuts on state owned lands.]. Accessible from https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/KasittelytiedotValtiopaivaasia/Sivut/KAA_9+2019.aspx [Accessed 2.2.2023]. [In Finnish.].
   Google Scholar
• Parliament of Finland. 2021. Memorandum of the committee of agriculture and forestry. MmVM 13/2021 vp – KAA 9/2019 vp. Accessible from https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/KasittelytiedotValtiopaivaasia/Sivut/KAA_9+2019.aspx. [Accessed 2.2.2023]. [In Finnish.].
   Google Scholar
• Puettmann K, Wilson S, Baker S, Donoso P, Drössler L, Amente G, Harvey B, Knoke T, Lu Y, Nocentini S, et al. 2015. Silvicultural alternatives to conventional even-aged forest management - what limits global adoption? For Ecosyst. 2(8):2–16. doi:10.1186/s40663-015-0031-x.
   Google Scholar
• Pukkala P, Vauhkonen J, Korhonen K, Packalen T. 2021. Self-learning growth simulator for modelling forest stand dynamics in changing conditions. Forestry. 94:333–346. doi:10.1093/forestry/cpab008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. 2011. Using optimization for fitting individual-tree growth models for uneven-aged stands. Eur J For Res. 130(5):829–839. doi:10.1007/s10342-010-0475-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pukkala T, Lähde E, Laiho O. 2013. Species interactions in the dynamics of even- and uneven-aged boreal forests. J Sustainable For. 32(4):371–403. doi:10.1080/10549811.2013.770766.
   Google Scholar
• Rämö J, Tahvonen O. 2015. Economics of harvesting boreal uneven-aged mixed-species forests. Can J For Res. 45(8):1102–1112. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0552.
   Google Scholar
• Rämö J, Tahvonen O. 2017. Optimizing the harvest timing in continuous cover forestry. Environ Resour Econ. 67:853–868. doi:10.1007/s10640-016-0008-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinha A, Rämö J, Malo P, Kallio M, Tahvonen O. 2017. Optimal management of naturally regenerating uneven-aged forests. Eur J Oper Res. 256(3):886–900. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.06.071.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvonen O. 2009. Optimal choice between even- and uneven-aged forestry. Nat Resour Model. 22(2):289–321. doi:10.1111/j.1939-7445.2008.00037.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvonen O. 2015. Economics of naturally regenerating, heterogeneous forests. J Assoc Environ Resour Econ. 2(2):309–337. doi:10.1086/681587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tahvonen O, Rämö J. 2016. Optimality of continuous cover vs. clearcut regimes in managing forest resources. Can J For Res. 46:891–901. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2015-0474.
   Google Scholar
• Tahvonen O, Rämö J, Mönkkönen M. 2019. Economics of mixed-species forestry with ecosystem services. Can J For Res. 49(10):1219–1232. doi:10.1139/cjfr-2018-0514.
   Google Scholar
• University of Helsinki, Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry. 2020. Lausunto lakialoitteesta avohakkuiden lopettamiseksi valtion mailla EDK-2020-AK-331242. [Statement on the initiative to stop clearcuts on state owned lands.] https://www.eduskunta.fi/FI/vaski/JulkaisuMetatieto/Documents/EDK-2020-AK-331242.pdf [Accessed 2.2.2023]. [In Finnish.].
   Google Scholar
• Valkonen S, Lappalainen S, Lähde E, Laiho O, Saksa T. 2017. Tree and stand recovery after heavy diameter-limit cutting in Norway spruce stands. For Ecol Manag. 389:68–75. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2016.12.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valsta LT. 1986. Mänty-rauduskoivusekametsikön hakkuuohjelman optimointi [Optimizing thinnings and rotation for mixed, even-aged pine-birch stands]. Folia For. 666:1–23. [In Finnish].
   Google Scholar