MR IMAGING OF UPPER ABDOMEN FOLLOWING CHOLECYSTECTOMY: Normal and abnormal findings

REFERENCES

• BRET P M. & REINHOLD C.: Magnetic resonance cholangi-opancreatography. Endoscopy 29 (1997), 472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BRUNE I. B., SCHÔNLEBEN K. & OMRAN S.: Complications after laparoscopic and conventional cholecystectomy. A comparative study. HPB Surg. 8 (1994), 19.
   Google Scholar
• BUANES T., WAAGE A., MALAND 0. & SOLHEIM K.: Bile leak after cholecystectomy — significance and treatment. Result from the national Norwegian Cholecystectomy Registry. Int. Surg. 81 (1996), 276.
   Google Scholar
• COAKLEY F. V, SCWARTZ L. H., BLUMGART L. H., FONG Y, JARNAGIN W. R. & PANICEK D. M.: Complex postchole-cystectomy biliary disorders. Preliminary experience with evaluation by means of breath-hold MR cholangiography. Radiology 209 (1998), 141.
   Google Scholar
• DEZIEL D. J., MILLIKAN K. W, ECONOMOU S. G., DOOLAS A., Ko S. T. & AIRAN M. C.: Complications of laparo-scopic cholecystectomy. A national survey of 4,292 hospi-tals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am. J. Surg. 165 (1993), 9.
   Google Scholar
• DINKEL H.-P, Mou, R., GASSEL H.-J., KNUPFFER J., Tim-MERMANN W, FIEGER M. & SCHINDLER G.: Helical CT cholangiography for the detection and localization of bile duct leakage. AJR 173 (1999), 613.
   Google Scholar
• ELBOIM C. M., GOLDMAN L., HANN L., PALESTRANT A. M. & SILEN W: Significance of post-cholecystectomy subhepatic fluid collection. Ann. Surg. 198 (1983), 137.
   Google Scholar
• FARRELL T. A., GERAGHTY J. G. & KEELING F.: Abdominal ultrasonography following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective study. Clin. Radiol. 47 (1993), 111.
   Google Scholar
• FLETCHER D. R., HOBBS M. S. T., TAN P et al.: Compli-cations of cholecystectomy. Risks of the laparoscopic ap-proach and protective effects of operative cholangiography. Ann. Surg. 229 (1999), 449.
   Google Scholar
• HÁKANSSON K., LEANDER P, EKBERG 0. & HÁKANSSON H.-0.: MR imaging in clinically suspected acute cholecystitis. Acta Radiol. 41 (2000), 322.
   Google Scholar
• KANG E. H., MIDDLETON W. D., BALFE D. M. & SOPER N. J.: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Evaluation with sono-graphy. Radiology 181 (1991), 439.
   Google Scholar
• MAC FADYEN B. V. JR, VECCHIO R., RICARDO A. E. & MATHIS C. R.: Bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy. The United States experience (Review). Surg. En-dosc. 12 (1998), 315.
   Google Scholar
• Mc ALLISTER J. D., D'ALTORIO R. A. & RAO V.: CT find-ings after uncomplicated and complicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Semin. Ultrasound CT MRI 14 (1993), 356.
   Google Scholar
• MC ALLISTER J. D., D'ALTORIO R. A. & SNYDER A.: CT findings after uncomplicated percutaneous laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 15 (1991), 770.
   Google Scholar
• MC MAHON A. J., RUSSEL I. T., BAXTER J. N. et al.: Laparo-scopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy. A random-ised trial. Lancet 343 (1994), 135.
   Google Scholar
• MIYAZAKI T., YAMASHITA Y, TSUCHIGAME T., YAMAMOTO H., URATA J. & TAKAHASHI M.: MR cholangiopancreato-graphy using HASTE (half-fourier acquisition single-shot turbo spin-echo) sequences. AJR 166 (1996), 1297.
   Google Scholar
• MALAND 0., ADAMSEN S., HJELMQVIST B., OVASKA J. & BUANES T.: Cholecystectomy rates, gallstone prevalence, and handling of bile duct injuries in Scandinavia. A com-parative audit. Surg. Endosc. 12 (1998), 1386.
   Google Scholar
• PAVONE P, LAGHI A., CATALANO C. et al.: MR cholangi-ography in the examination of patients with biliary-enteric anastomoses. AJR 169 (1997), 807.
   Google Scholar
• RAY C. E. JR, HIBBELN J. F & WILBUR A. C.: Compli-cations after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Imaging find-ings. AJR 160 (1993), 1029.
   Google Scholar
• SEMELKA R. C., KELEKIS N. L., THOMASSON D., BROWN M. A. & LAUB G. A.: HASTE MR imaging. Description of technique and preliminary results in the abdomen. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 6 (1996), 698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SHIRAZI K. K. & MAULL K. I.: Subhepatic sonography fol-lowing cholecystectomy. J. Ultrasound Med. 1 (1982), 271.
   Google Scholar
• SMITH R., KOLYN D., PYMAR H., SAUERBREI E. & PACE R. F.: Ultrasonographic and radiologic evaluation of patients after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Can. J. Surg. 35 (1992), 55.
   Google Scholar
• TRERoToLA S. 0., SAVADER S. J., LUND G. B. et al.: Biliary tract complications following laparoscopic cholecys-tectomy. Imaging and intervention. Radiology 184 (1992), 195.
   Google Scholar
• WALKER A. T., SHAPIRO A. W, BROOKS D. C., BRAVER J. M. & TUMEH S. S.: Bile duct disruption and biloma after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Imaging evaluation. AJR 158 (1992), 785.
   Google Scholar
• Yo-i T. S., JAN Y. Y, TSENG J. H., HWANG T. L., JENG L. B. & CHEN M. F.: Value of magnetic resonance cholangi-opancreatography in demonstrating major bile duct in-juries following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br. J. Surg. 86 (1999), 181.
   Google Scholar