Effect of Computer-Aided Detection on Mammographic Performance: Experimental Study on Readers with Different Levels of Experience

References

• Alberdi E., Povyakalo A., Strigini L., Ayton P. Effects of incorrect computer-aided detection (CAD) output on human decision-making in mammography. Acad Radiol 2004; 11: 909–18
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow W. E., Chi C., Carney P. A., Taplin S. H., D'orsi C., Cutter G., et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 1840–50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beam C. A., Layde P. M., Sullivan D. C. Variability in the interpretation of screening mammograms by US radiologists, findings from national sample. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 209–13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birdwell R. L., Ikeda D. M., O'Shaughnessy K. F., Sickles E. A. Mammographic characteristics of missed cancers later detected with screening mammography and the potential utility of computer-aided detection. Radiology 2001; 219: 192–202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanks R. G., Wallis M. G., Given-Wilson R. M. Observer variability in cancer detection during routine repeat (incident) mammographic screening in a study of two versus one view mammography. J Med Screen 1999; 6: 152–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem R. F., Schoonjans J. M. Radiologist detection of microcalcifications with and without computer-aided detection: a comparative study. Clin Radiol 2001; 56: 150–4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciatto S., Del Turco M. R., Risso G., Catarzi S., Bonardi R., Viterbo V., et al. Comparison of standard reading and computer aided detection (CAD) on a national proficiency of screening mammography. Eur J Radiol 2003; 45: 135–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conover W. J. Practical non-parametric statistics. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester 1980; 130–3
   Google Scholar
• Destounis S. V., DiNitto P., Logan-Young W., Bonaccio E., Zuley M. L., Willison K. M. Can computer-aided detection with double reading of screening mammograms help decrease the false-negative rate? Initial experience. Radiology 2004; 232: 578–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnish Cancer Registry, Cancer statistics at www.cancerregistry.fi last updated on May 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Freer T. W., Ulissey M. J. Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology 2001; 220: 781–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gram I. T., Funkhouser E., Tabar L. The Tabar classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Eur J Radiol 1997; 24: 131–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gur D., Sumkin J. H., Rockette H. E., Ganott M., Hakim C., Hardesty L., et al. Changes in breast cancer detection and mammography recall rates after the introduction of a computer-aided detection system. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004; 96: 185–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gönen M., Panageas K. S., Larson S. M. Statistical issues in analysis of diagnostic imaging experiments with multiple observations per patient. Radiology 2001; 221: 763–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawass N. E. D. Comparing the sensitivities and specificities of two diagnostic procedures performed on the same group of patients. Br J Radiol 1997; 70: 360–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karssemeijer N., Otten J. D. M., Verbeek A. L. M., Groenewoud J. H., Koning H. J., Hendriks J. H. L. C., et al. Computer-aided detection versus independent double reading of masses on mammograms. Radiology 2003; 227: 192–200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malich A., Marx C., Facius M., Boehm T., Fleck M., Kaiser W. A. Tumour detection rate of a new commercially available computer-aided detection system. Eur Radiol 2001; 11: 2454–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moberg K., Bjurstam N., Wilczek B., Rostgard L., Egge E., Muren C. Computed assisted detection of interval breast cancers. Eur J Radiol 2001; 39: 104–10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saarenmaa I., Salminen T., Geiger U., Holli K., Isola J., Kärkkäinen A., et al. The visibility of cancer on earlier mammograms in a population-based screening programme. Eur J Cancer 1999; 35: 1118–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sickles E. A., Wolverton D. E., Dee K. E. Performance parameters for screening and diagnostic mammography: specialist and general radiologists. Radiology 2002; 224: 861–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor P. M., Champness J., Given-Wilson R. M., Potts H. W. W., Johnston K. An evaluation of the impact of computer-based prompts on screen readers' interpretation of mammograms. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: 21–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor P., Given-Wilson R., Champness J., Potts H. W. W., Johnston K. Assessing the impact of CAD on the sensitivity and specificity of film readers. Clin Rad 2004; 59: 1099–105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurfjell E., Thurfjell M. G., Egge E., Bjurstam N. Sensitivity and specificity of computer assisted breast cancer detection in mammography screening. Acta Radiol 1998; 39: 384–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren Burhenne L. J., Wood S. A., D'Orsi C. J., Feig S. A., Kopans D. B., O'Shaughnessy K. F., et al. Potential contribution of computer-aided detection to the sensitivity of screening mammography. Radiology 2000; 215: 554–62
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar