References
- Jessen K. A. Going digital can help lower radiation dose. Diagn Imaging. 2004
- Mettler F. A., Wiest P. W., Locken J., Kelsey C. CT scanning: patterns of use and dose. J Radiol Prot 2000; 20: 353–9
- CT dose reduction using SharpView CT. 2005. White paper version 1.2, 2005. ContextVision AB. Available at URL: http://www.contextvision.se/ (accessed December 5, 2006)
- Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority. 2005. Guidance No.5. Guidance for use of medical X-ray and MR equipment subjected to approval: guidance to “Regulations for radiation protection and use of radiation.”. NRPA. Available at URL: http://www.nrpa.no/applications/system/publish/view/showLinks.asp?ips = 1&archive = 1000336 (accessed April 18, 2007)
- Metz C. E. ROC methodology in radiographic imaging. Invest Radiol 1986; 21: 720–33
- Metz C. E. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989; 24: 234–45
- Olerud H. M., Olsen J., Skretting A. An anthropomorphic phantom for receiver operating characteristic studies in CT imaging of liver lesions. Br J Radiol 1999; 72: 35–43
- Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982; 143: 29–36
- Hanley J. A., McNeil B. J. A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology 1983; 148: 839–43