Optimization of Computed Tomography Urography Protocol, 1997 to 2008: Effects on Radiation Dose

References

• Jhaveri KS, Saini S, Levine LA, Piazzo DJ, Doncaster RJ, Halpern EF, et al. Effect of multislice CT technology on scanner productivity. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177: 769–72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop M. New challenges in MDCT. Eur Radiol 2005; 15(Suppl 5)E35–45
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council (U.S.). Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Level of Ionizing Radiation. Health risks from exposure to low levels of ionizing radiation: BEIR VII, Phase 2. 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Almén A, Richter S, Leitz W. SSI Rapport 2008:03. Radiologiska undersökningar i Sverige under 2005. Stockholm: Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSI); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Akbar SA, Mortele KJ, Baeyens K, Kekelidze M, Silverman SG. Multidetector CT urography: techniques, clinical applications, and pitfalls. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2004; 25: 41–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Korobkin M, Platt JF, Francis IR, Faerber GJ, et al. Urinary tract abnormalities: initial experience with multi-detector row CT urography. Radiology 2002; 222: 353–60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Molen AJ, Veldkamp WJ, Geleijns J. 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys. Br J Radiol 2007; 80: 248–55
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickoloff EL, Alderson PO. Radiation exposures to patients from CT: reality, public perception, and policy. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 17: 285–7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovis TL. CT and computed radiography: the pictures are great, but is the radiation dose greater than required?. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 19: 39–41
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra MK, Prasad S, Saini S, Blake MA, Varghese J, Halpern EF, et al. Clinical comparison of standard-dose and 50% reduced-dose abdominal CT: effect on image quality. Am J Roentgenol 2002; 179: 1101–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography—an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2277–84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawfel RD, Judy PF, Schleipman AR, Silverman SG. Patient radiation dose at CT urography and conventional urography. Radiology 2004; 232: 126–32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McTavish JD, Jinzaki M, Zou KH, Nawfel RD, Silverman SG. Multi-detector row CT urography: comparison of strategies for depicting the normal urinary collecting system. Radiology 2002; 225: 783–90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman JR, Caoili EM, Cohan RH. Multi-detector CT urography: a one-stop renal and urinary tract imaging modality. Abdom Imaging 2007; 32: 519–29
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van Der Molen AJ, Cowan NC, Mueller-Lisse UG, Nolte-Ernsting CC, Takahashi S, Cohan RH. CT urography: definition, indications and techniques. A guideline for clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2008; 18: 4–17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leitz W, Almén A. 2008:02. Patientstråldoser vid röntgendiagnostik i Sverige – 1999 och 2006. Stockholm: Swedish Radiation Safety Authority (SSI); 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Yakoumakis E, Tsalafoutas IA, Nikolaou D, Nazos I, Koulentianos E, Proukakis C. Differences in effective dose estimation from dose-area product and entrance surface dose measurements in intravenous urography. Br J Radiol 2001; 74: 727–34
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentin J. Managing patient dose in multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT). ICRP Publication 102. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 1–79, iii
   Google Scholar
• Brenner D, Elliston C, Hall E, Berdon W. Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. Am J Roentgenol 2001; 176: 289–96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warshauer DM, McCarthy SM, Street L, Bookbinder MJ, Glickman MG, Richter J, et al. Detection of renal masses: sensitivities and specificities of excretory urography/linear tomography, US, and CT. Radiology 1988; 169: 363–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JK, Park SY, Ahn HJ, Kim CS, Cho KS. Bladder cancer: analysis of multi-detector row helical CT enhancement pattern and accuracy in tumor detection and perivesical staging. Radiology 2004; 231: 725–31
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park SB, Kim JK, Lee HJ, Choi HJ, Cho KS. Hematuria: portal venous phase multi detector row CT of the bladder—a prospective study. Radiology 2007; 245: 798–805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsili AC, Efremidis SC, Kalef-Ezra J, Giannakis D, Alamanos Y, Sofikitis N, et al. Multi-detector row CT urography on a 16-row CT scanner in the evaluation of urothelial tumors. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1046–54
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turney BW, Willatt JM, Nixon D, Crew JP, Cowan NC. Computed tomography urography for diagnosing bladder cancer. BJU Int 2006; 98: 345–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caoili EM, Cohan RH, Inampudi P, Ellis JH, Shah RB, Faerber GJ, et al. MDCT urography of upper tract urothelial neoplasms. Am J Roentgenol 200; 184: 1873–81
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eikefjord E, Askildsen JE, Rorvik J. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of intravenous urography (IVU) and unenhanced multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for initial investigation of suspected acute ureterolithiasis. Acta Radiol 2008; 49: 222–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference organized by the Society of Pediatric Radiology. August 18–19, 2001. Pediatr Radiol 2002;32:217–313.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlman P, Semenas E, Brekkan E, Bergman A, Magnusson A. Detection and characterisation of renal lesions by multiphasic helical CT. Acta Radiol 2000; 41: 361–6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahlman P, Jangland L, Magnusson M, Magnusson A. CT urography: how low can we go? ESUR (European Society of Urogenital Radiology). Cairo, Egypt, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kalender WA, Wolf H, Suess C, Gies M, Greess H, Bautz WA. Dose reduction in CT by on-line tube current control: principles and validation on phantoms and cadavers. Eur Radiol 1999; 9: 323–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalender WA, Buchenau S, Deak P, Kellermeier M, Langner O, van Straten M, et al. Technical approaches to the optimisation of CT. Phys Med 2008; 24: 71–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalra MK, Singh S, Blake MA. CT of the urinary tract: turning attention to radiation dose. Radiol Clin North Am 2008; 46: 1–9, v
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolte-Ernsting C, Cowan N. Understanding multislice CT urography techniques: many roads lead to Rome. Eur Radiol 2006;16:2670–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bongartz G, Golding S, Jurik A, Leonardi M, van Meerten E, Geleijns J , et al. European Guidelines on Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography, EUR 16262. 1999 [Available from http://www.drs.dk/guidelines/ct/quality/].
   Google Scholar
• Chow LC, Kwan SW, Olcott EW, Sommer G. Split-bolus MDCT urography with synchronous nephrographic and excretory phase enhancement. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 189: 314–22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chai RY, Jhaveri K, Saini S, Hahn PF, Nichols S, Mueller PR. Comprehensive evaluation of patients with haematuria on multi-slice computed tomography scanner: protocol design and preliminary observations. Australas Radiol 2001; 45: 536–8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson TR, Krauss B, Sedlmair M, Grasruck M, Bruder H, Morhard D, et al. Material differentiation by dual energy CT: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 1510–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheffel H, Stolzmann P, Frauenfelder T, Schertler T, Desbiolles L, Leschka S, et al. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the detection of urinary stone disease. Invest Radiol 2007; 42: 823–9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards TJ, Dickinson AJ, Natale S, Gosling J, McGrath JS. A prospective analysis of the diagnostic yield resulting from the attendance of 4020 patients at a protocol-driven haematuria clinic. BJU Int 2006; 97: 301–5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szolar DH, Kammerhuber F, Altziebler S, Tillich M, Breinl E, Fotter R, et al. Multiphasic helical CT of the kidney: increased conspicuity for detection and characterization of small (<3-cm) renal masses. Radiology 1997; 202: 211–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum BA, Jacobs JE, Ramchandani P. Multiphasic renal CT: comparison of renal mass enhancement during the corticomedullary and nephrographic phases. Radiology 1996; 200: 753–8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrington BM, Johnson RJ. Case report: inverted contrast medium–urine level in the bladder on computed tomography. Clin Radiol 1992; 46: 216–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim SH, Han MC. Reversed contrast-urine levels in urinary bladder: CT findings. Urol Radiol 1992; 13: 249–52
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nyman U, Ahl TL, Kristiansson M, Nilsson L, Wettemark S. Patient-circumference-adapted dose regulation in body computed tomography. A practical and flexible formula. Acta Radiol 2005; 46: 396–406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jangland L, Sanner E, Persliden J. Dose reduction in computed tomography by individualized scan protocols. Acta Radiol 2004; 45: 301–7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tack D, Sourtzis S, Delpierre I, de Maertelaer V, Gevenois PA. Low-dose unenhanced multidetector CT of patients with suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol 2003; 180: 305–11
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT, Schmidlin FR, Iselin CE, Becker CD. Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 927–33
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prokop M. Radiation dose and image quality. Spiral and multislice computed tomography of the body, M Prokop, M Galanski. Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 2003; 155
   Google Scholar
• Kemper J, Regier M, Bansmann PM, Begemann PG, Stork A, Nagel HD, et al. Multidetector CT urography: experimental analysis of radiation dose reduction in an animal model. Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2318–24
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theocharopoulos N, Damilakis J, Perisinakis K, Gourtsoyiannis N. Energy imparted-based estimates of the effect of z overscanning on adult and pediatric patient effective doses from multi-slice computed tomography. Med Phys 2007; 34: 1139–52
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar