Iodixanol in Cardioangiography in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

References

• Abrams H. L. Complications of coronary arteriography. Angiography. Vascular and interventional radiology. Little, Brown & Co., Boston 1982; 503
   Google Scholar
• Almén T. Relations between chemical structure, animal toxicity and clinical adverse effects of contrast media. Patient safety and adverse events in contrast medium examinations, I. Enge, J. Edgren. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1989; 25
   Google Scholar
• Amiel M., Moll T., Revel D., et al. Comparison of the electrophysiologic effects of ioxaglate and iopamidol during selective coronary arteriography. Invest. Radiol. 1990; 25: S141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bååth L., Almén T. Reducing the risk of ventricular fibrillation by adding sodium to ionic and non-ionic contrast media with low iodine concentration. Acta Radiol. 1989; 30: 207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bååth L., Almén T., Øksendal A. Oxygen saturation of the low osmolar contrast media iohexol, ioxaglate and iodixanol. Effects on contractile force and frequency of ventricular fibrillation in the isolated rabbit heart. Acta Radiol. 1990; 31: 519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K. J., Jakobsen J. Å. Nephrotoxicity related to contrast media. Patient safety and adverse events in contrast medium examinations, I. Enge, J. Edgren. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam 1989; 111
   Google Scholar
• Berns A. S. Nephrotoxicity of contrast media. Kidney Int. 1989; 36: 730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson P., Howell M. The non-ionic dimers. A new class of contrast agents. Br. J. Radiol. 1986; 59: 987
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen E. A., Kløw N. E., Mortensen E., Refsum H. Sodium addition to nonionic contrast media. Effects on cardiac monophasic action potentials and hemodynamics in a dog model. Invest. Radiol. 1991; 26: 888
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Kolbenstvedt A. N., Levorstad K., Berg K. J., Enge I. Renal effects of nonionic contrast media after intravenous, cardiac, and lumbar aortic injections. Invest. Radiol. 1990; 25: S135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Lundby B., Kristoffersen D. T., Borch K. W., Hald J. K., Berg K. J. Evaluation of renal function with delayed CT after injection of nonionic monomeric and dimeric contrast media in healthy volunteers. Radiology 1992; 182: 419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kløw N. E., Mortensen E., Refsum H. Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function during coronary arteriography before and after acute left ventricular failure in dogs. Acta Radiol. 1991; 32: 124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levorstad K., Vatne K., Brodahl U., Laake B., Simonsen S., Aakhus T. Safety of the nonionic contrast medium Omnipaque in coronary angiography. Cardiovasc. Intervent. Radiol. 1989; 12: 98
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini G. B. J., Bloomquist J. N., Bhargava V., et al. Hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects in man of a new nonionic contrast agent (iohexol). Advantages over standard ionic agents. Am. J. Cardiol. 1983; 51: 1218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris T. W. The importance of sodium concentration on the incidence of fibrillation during coronary arteriography in dogs. Invest. Radiol. 1988; 23: S137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nossen J. Ø., Aakhus T., Berg K. J., Jørgensen N. P., Andrew E. Experience with iodixanol, a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium. Invest. Radiol. 1990; 25: S113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piao Z. E., Murdoch D. K., Hwang M. H., Raymond R. M., Scanlon P. J. The effect of sodium on the fibrillatory propensity of nonionic contrast media. Invest. Radiol. 1987; 22: 895
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schräder R., Baller D., Hoeft A., Korb H., Wolpers H. G., Helliger G. Reduced side effects of low osmolality nonionic contrast media in coronary arteriography. Contrast media, V. Taenzer, E. Zeitler. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1983; 67
   Google Scholar
• Schwab S. J., Hlatky M. A., Pieper K. S., et al. Contrast nephrotoxicity. A randomized controlled trial of a nonionic and an ionic radiographic contrast agent. N. Engl. J. Med. 1989; 320: 149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snedecor G. W., Cochran W. G. Statistical methods. Iowa State University Press, , IA 1978; 258
   Google Scholar
• Stacul F., Carrado M., Magnaldi S., Faccini L., Guarnieri G., Palma L. D. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity. Comparison of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents. AJR 1987; 149: 1287
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taliercio C. P., Burnett J. C. Contrast nephropathy, cardiology and the newer radiocontrast agents. Int. J. Cardiol. 1988; 19: 145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisneski J. A., Gertz E. W., Dahlgren M., Muslin A. Comparison of low osmolality ionic (ioxaglate) versus nonionic (iopamidol) contrast media in cardiac angiography. Am. J. Cardiol. 1989; 63: 489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar