Iodixanol in Cardioangiography

References

• Albrechtsson U., Larusdottir H., Norgren L., Lundby B. Iodixanol – a new nonionic dimer – in aortofemoral angiography. Acta Radiol 1992; 33: 611
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almén T. Contrast media. The relation of chemical structure, animal toxicity and adverse clinical effects. Am. J. Cardiol 1990; 66: 2F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K. J., Kolmannskog F., Lillevold P. E., et al. Iopentol in patients with chronic renal failure. Its effects on renal function and its use as glomerular filtration rate parameter. Scand. J. Clin. Lab. Invest 1992; 52: 27
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berns A. S. Nephrotoxicity of contrast media. Kidney Int 1989; 36: 730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolstad B., Borch K. W., Grynne B. H., et al. Safety and tolerability of iodixanol. A dimeric, nonionic contrast medium. An emphasis on European clinical phases I and II. Invest. Radiol 1991; 2: S201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deray G., Cacoub P., Jacquiaud C., et al. Renal tolerance for ioxaglate in patients with chronic renal failure. Radiology 1991; 179: 395
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman R. L. A comparison of heparinized low osmolality ionic and non-ionic contrast media in 500 patients undergoing cardiac angiography. Clin. Cardiol 1990; 1: 794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gertz E. W., Wisneski J. A., Miller R., et al. Adverse reactions of low osmolality contrast media during cardiac angiography. A prospective randomized multicenter study. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol 1992; 19: 899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger R. G. Osmolality of intravascular radiological contrast media. Br. J. Radiol 1980; 53: 739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Berg K. J. The influence of iodinated contrast media on renal function, with special reference to iopentol. Iopentol. Clinical trials with a new non-ionic contrast medium, F. Lærum, B. Kendall. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., Amsterdam 1990; 63
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Kolbenstvedt A. N., Berg K. J. Renal effects of iopentol and iohexol after intravenous injection. Acta Radiol 1991; 32: 320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobsen J. Å., Lundby B., Kristoffersen D. T., Borch K. W., Hald J. K., Berg K. J. Evaluation of renal function with delayed CT after injection of non-ionic monomeric and dimeric contrast media in healthy volunteers. Radiology 1992; 182: 419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jevnikar A. M., Finnie K. J. C., Dennis B., Plummer D. T., Avila A., Linton A. L. Nephrotoxicity of high- and low-osmolality contrast media. Nephron 1988; 48: 300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katholi R. E., Taylor G. J., Woods W. T., et al. Nephrotoxicity of nonionic low-osmolality versus ionic high-osmolality contrast media. A prospective double-blind randomized comparison in human beings. Radiology 1993; 186: 183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kløw N. E., Levorstad K., Berg K. J., et al. Iodixanol in cardioangiography in patients with coronary artery disease. Tolerability, cardiac and renal effects. Acta Radiol 1993; 34: 72
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koutsikos D., Konstadinidou I., Mourikis D., et al. Contrast media nephrotoxicity. Comparison of diatrizoate, ioxaglate and iohexol after intravenous and renal arterial administration. Ren. Fail 1992; 14: 545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons J., Brooks N., Cattell M., Isolani-Smyth E., Balcon R. Comparison of Hexabrix 320 and Conray 420 for left ventriculography in patients with coronary artery disease. Br. J. Radiol 1984; 57: 209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikonoff T., Skau T., Berglund J., Nyberg P., Spångberg-Viklund B., Larsson R. Effects of femoral arteriography and low osmolar contrast agents on renal function. Acta Radiol 1993; 34: 88
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nossen J. Ø., Bach-Gansmo T., Kloster Y., Jørgensen N. P. Heat sensation in connection with intravenous injection of isotonic and low-osmolar X-ray contrast media and mannitol solutions. Eur. Radiol 1993; 3: 46
   Google Scholar
• Petersen R., McKay C. R., Kawanishi D. T., Kotlewski A., Parise K., Niland J. C. Double-blind comparison of the clinical, hemodynamic, and electrocardiographic effects of sodium meglumine ioxaglate or iohexol during diagnostic cardiac catheterization. Angiology 1992; 43: 765
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pugh N. D., Sissons G. R. J., Ruttley M. S. T., Berg K. J., Nossen J. Ø., Eide H. Iodixanol in femoral arteriography (phase III). A comparative double-blind parallel trial between iodixanol and iopromide. Clin. Radiol 1993; 47: 96
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacul F., Carrao M., Magnaldi S., Faccini L., Guarnieri G., Palma L. D. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents. AJR 1987; 4: 1287
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uthmann U., Geisen H. P., Glück E. Urinary β2-microglobulin determinations in assessment of tubular dysfunction after X-ray contrast media application. Contrast media in urography, angiography and computerized tomography, V. Taenzer, E. Zeitler. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart 1983; 43
   Google Scholar