References
- Heindel W., Friedmann G., Bunke J., Thomas B., Firsching R., Ernestus R.-I. Artifacts in MR imaging after surgical intervention. J. Comput. Assist. Tomogr. 1986; 10: 596
- Holtås S., Olsson M., Romner B., Larsson E.-M., Säveland H., Brandt L. Comparison of MR imaging and CT in patients with intracranial aneurysm clips. AJNR 1988; 9: 891
- Holtås S., Wallengren N. O., Ericsson A., Bach-Gansmo T. Signal alterations, artifacts and image distortion induced by a superparamagnetic contrast medium. Acta Radiol. 1990; 31: 213
- Laakman R., Kaufman B., Han J., et al. MR imaging in patients with metallic implants. Radiology 1985; 157: 711
- Lüdeke K., Röschmann P., Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1985; 3: 329
- Olsson M., Brockstedt S., Lundin R., Persson B. Signal displacement and signal loss in MR imaging due to small metallic implants. A quantitative study using computer simulation. Magnetic field perturbation in proton MR imaging. Thesis, Lund University. 1992
- Romner B., Olsson M., Ljunggren B., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and aneurysm clips. J. Neurosurg. 1989; 70: 426
- Rubin D., Ratner A., Young S. Magnetic susceptibility effects and their application in the development of new ferromagnetic catheters for magnetic resonance imaging. Invest. Radiol. 1990; 25: 1325
- Shellock F., Curtis J. MR imaging and biomedical implants, materials, and devices. An updated review. Radiology 1991; 180: 541
- Teitelbaum G., Bradley W., Jr, Klein B. MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. Radiology 1988; 166: 657