Development of Radiation Therapy Optimization

References

• Schulz M. The supervoltage story. Am J Roentgenol 1974; 124: 541–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alit WEC. Supervoltage radiation treatment in advanced cancer of the uterine cervix. A preliminary report. Can Med Assn J. 1969; 100: 792–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush RS. Management in carcinoma of cervix, uterus and ovary. London: Edward Arnold, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• Russell KJ, Caplan RJ, Laramore GE, et al. Photon versus fast neutron external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced prostate cancer: results of a randomized prospective trial. Int .1- Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 28: 47–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holthusen H. Erfahrunger uber die Vertraglichkeitsgrenze fur Rontgenstrahlen und deren Nutzanwendung zur Verhutung von Schade. Strahlenther 1936; 57: 254.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz RJ. Further improvements in dose distributions are unlikely to affect cure rates. Med Phys 1999; 26: 1007–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho KH, Khan FM, Levitt SH. Cost-benefit analysis of 3D conformal radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 1999; 38: 603–11.
   Google Scholar
• kgren-Cronqvist A, Källman P, Turesson I, et al. Volume and heterogeneity dependence of the dose-response relation-ship for head and neck tumours. Acta Oncol 1995; 34: 851–60.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin P. A direction for clinical radiation pathology. The tolerance dose. In: Vaeth JM, ed. Front Radiation Therapy & Oncology, vol. 6. Basel: S Karger, 1972: 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Emami B, Lyman J, Brown A, et al. Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. Int .1- Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1991; 21: 109–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• kgren Cronqvist A-K. Quantification of the response of heterogeneous tumors and organized normal tissues to frac-tionated radiotherapy. Thesis, Stockholm University, ISBN 91-7153-371-0, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Optimized radiation therapy based on radiobio-logical objectives. Semin Oncol 1999; 9: 35–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Biologically based treatment planning. In: Mus-takallio Centennial Symposium Helsinki. Acta Oncol 1999; 13 (Suppl): 61–8.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. Acta Radiol Oncol 1984; 23: 379–91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A, ;kgren A. On the optimal dose distribution for eradication of heterogeneous tumors. Acta Oncol 1987; 26: 377–85.
   Google Scholar
• Källman P, ;kgren A, Brahme A. Tumor and normal tissue responses to fractionated non uniform dose delivery. Int .1- Rad Biol 1992; 62: 249–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lyman JT. Complication probability as assessed from dose-vol-ume histograms. Radiat Res 1985; 104: S13–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolbarst AB. Optimization of radiation therapy II: the critical-voxel model. Int .1- Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1984; 10: 741–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• kgren A, Brahme A, Turesson I. Optimization of uncompli-cated control for head and neck tumors. Int .1- Rad Onc Biol Phys 1990; 19: 1077–85.
   Google Scholar
• Aaltonen P, Brahme A, Lax I, et al. Specification of dose delivery in radiation therapy. Recommendations by the NACP. Acta Oncol 1997; 10 (Suppl): 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Timme TL, Moses RE. Review: Diseases with DNA damage processing defects. Am J Med Sci 1988; 295: 40–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LW' J, Lind BK, Brahme A. Optimal radiation beam profiles considering the stochastic process of patient positioning in fractionated radiation therapy. Inverse Problems 1995; 11: 1189–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LW' J, Lind BK, Brahme A. An adaptive control algorithm for optimization of intensity-modulated radiotherapy considering uncertainties in beam profiles, patient set-up, and internal organ motion. Phys Med Biol 1998; 43: 1605–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafsson A, Lind BK, Brahme A, et al. A generalised pencil beam algorithm for optimization of radiation therapy. Med Phys 1994; 21: 343–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LW' J, Lind BK, Liander A, et al. Simultaneous beam orienta-tion and intensity-modulation optimization using the new universal radiotherapy optimization code ORBIT. Int J Radiat Oncol, 2000; in press.
   Google Scholar
• Turesson I, Brahme A. Clinical rationale for high precision radiotherapy. Malmo: ESTRO, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Wright KA, Proimos BS, Trump JG. Physical aspects of two million volt X-ray therapy. Surg Clin North Am 1959; 39: 567–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi S. Conformation radiotherapy, rotation techniques as applied to radiography and radiotherapy. Acta Radiol Suppl 1965; 242.
   Google Scholar
• Hope CS, Orr HS. Computer optimization of 4 MeV treatment planning. Phys Med Biol 1965; 10: 365–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterling TD, Perry H, Weinkam JJ. Automation of radiation treatment planning. V. Calculation and visualisation of the total treatment volume. Br J Radiol 1965; 38: 906–13.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Treatment optimization using physical and biolog-ical objective functions. In: Smith A, ed. Radiation Therapy Physics. Berlin: Springer, 1995: 209–46.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson R, Lind BK, Brahme A. Beam characteristics and possibilities of a new compact treatment unit design combining narrow pencil beam scanning and segmental multileaf collima-tion. Med Phys 1998; 25: 2358–69.
   Google Scholar
• Withers HR, Taylor JMG, Maciejewski B. Treatment volume and tissue tolerance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1988; 14: 751–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmer KG. Studies on quantitative radiation biology. Lon-don: Oliver & Boyd, 1961.
   Google Scholar
• Lambin P, Malaise EP, Joiner MC. The effect of very low radiation doses on the human bladder carcinoma cell line RT112. Radiother Oncol 1994; 32: 63–72.
   Google Scholar
• Turesson I, Joiner MC. Clinical evidence of hypersensitivity to low doses in radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol 1996; 40: 1–3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Withers HR, Taylor JMG, Maciejewski B. The hazard of accelerated tumor clonogen repopulation during radiotherapy. Acta Oncol 1988; 27: 131–46.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Design principles, beam properties and clinical possibilities of a new generation of radiation therapy equip-ment. Acta Oncol 1987; 26: 403–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Device for isocentric radiation therapy with heavy ions. Sw. Pat. 1985; 8501675–6: 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Montelius A, Blomquist E, Naeser P, et al. The narrow proton beam therapy unit at the The Svedberg Laboratory in Uppsala. Acta Oncol 1991; 30: 739–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner TR, Chu WT, Ludewigt BA. Advantages of beam scanning and requirements of hadrontherapy facilities. In: Amaldi U, Larsson B, eds. Hadrontherapy in Oncology, Excerpta Medica ICS 1077. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1994: 453–61.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Scanning system for charged and neutral particles. Sw. Pat. 7904360–0, 1979.
   Google Scholar
• CROS (the Committee for Radiation Oncology Studies) Pro-posal for a program in particle-beam radiation therapy in the United States. Cancer Clin Trials 1978; 1: 153–208.
   Google Scholar
• Tilikidis A, Brahme A. Microdosimetric description of beam quality and biological effectiveness in radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 1994; 33: 457–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor MH, Hussey DH, Fletcher GH, et al. Fast neutron therapy for locally advanced head and neck tumors. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1981; 7: 155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Physical and biologic aspects on the optimum choice of radiation modality. Acta Radiol Oncol 1982; 21: 469–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guichard M, Guelette J, Lublin G, et al. The comparative response of human fibroblasts EMT6 and V79 cells to 50 MeV neutrons. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1978; 4: 621–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ksell M, Hyödynmaa S, Söderström S, et al. Optimal electron and combined electron and photon therapy in the phase space of complication free cure. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 235–52.
   Google Scholar
• Korevaar EW, Heijmen BJM, Woudstra E, et al. Mixing intensity-modulated electron and photon beams: combining a steep dose fall-off at depth with sharp and depth-independent penumbras and flat beam profiles. Phys Med Biol 1999; 44: 2171–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söderström S, Brahme A. Optimization of the dose delivery in few field techniques using radiobiological objective functions. Med Phys 1993; 20: 1201–10.
   Google Scholar
• Söderström S, Eklof A, Brahme A. Aspects on the optimal photon beam energy for radiation therapy. Acta Oncol 1999; 38: 179–87.
   Google Scholar
• Brahme A. Optimization of radiation therapy and the develop-ment of multileaf collimation. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys 1993; 25: 373–5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lind B, Brahme A. Development of treatment techniques for radiotherapy optimization. Int J Imag Syst Technol 1995; 6: 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svensson R. Development of a compact high-energy treatment unit combining narrow pencil beam scanning and multileaf collimation. Thesis, Stockholm University, ISBN 91-7153-740-6, 1998.
   Google Scholar
• LW' J, Liander A, Myer G, et al. ORBIT-A general object oriented code for radiotherapy optimization. Radiother Oncol 1998; 48 (Suppl 1): S69.
   Google Scholar
• Maehle-Schmidt M, Palmgren J, Lind B, et al. A Bayesian sequential model for updating radiobiological parameters in radiation therapy. In: Second European Conf on Highly Structured Stochastic Systems. Pavia, Book of Abstracts 1999; 180–1.
   Google Scholar
• Ling CC, Burman C, Chui CS, et al. Perspectives of multidi-mensional conformal radiation treatment. Radiother Oncol 1993; 29: 129–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar