Survival of Cancer Patients in Finland 1955-1994

REFERENCES

• Finnish Cancer Registry. Cancer Incidence in Finland 1995. Cancer Society of Finland Publication No. 58. Helsinki: Cancer Society of Finland, 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Hakulinen T, Pukkala E, Hakama M, Lehtonen M, Sax& E, Teppo L. Survival of cancer patients in Finland in 1953–1974. Ann Clin Res 1981; 13 (Suppl 31): 1–101.
   Google Scholar
• Teppo L, Pukkala E, Lehtonen M. Data quality and quality control of a population-based cancer registry. Experience in Finland. Acta Oncol 1994; 33: 365–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hakulinen T. Health care system, cancer registration and follow-up of cancer patients in Finland. In: Berrino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Esteve J, eds. Survival of cancer patients in Europe: the EUROCARE study. IARC Scientific Publications No. 132. Lyon: Interna-tional Agency for Research on Cancer, 1995: 53–4.
   Google Scholar
• Pukkala E. Use of record linkage in small-area studies. In: Elliott P, Cuzick J, English D, Stern R, eds. Geographical and environmental epidemiology: methods for small-area studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1992: 125–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ederer F, Axtell LM, Cutler SJ. The relative survival rate: a statistical methodology. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1961; 6: 101–21.
   Google Scholar
• Berkson J, Gage RP. Calculation of survival rates for cancer. Mayo Clin Proc 1950; 25: 270–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakulinen T, Abeywickrama K. A computer program pack-age for relative survival analysis. Comput Programs Biomed 1985; 19: 197–207.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hakulinen T. Cancer survival corrected for heterogeneity in patient withdrawal. Biometrics 1982; 38: 933–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakulinen T, Rahiala M. An example of the risk dependence and additivity of intensities in the theory of competing risks. Biometrics 1977; 33: 557–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler SJ, Axtell LM. Partitioning of a patient population with respect to different mortality patterns. J Am Stat Assoc 1963; 58: 701–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood M. The errors of sampling of the survivorship table. Reports on public health and medical subjects, Vol. 33. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1926.
   Google Scholar
• Zahl PH, Tretli S. Long-term survival of breast cancer in Norway by age and clinical stage. Stat Med 1997; 16: 1435–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakama M, Joutsenlahti U, Virtanen A, Rdsdnen-Virtanen U. Mass screening for cervical cancer in Finland 1963-71. Ann Clin Res 1975; 7: 101–11.
   Google Scholar
• Läärd E, Day N, Hakama M. Trends in mortality from cervical cancer in the Nordic countries: association with or-ganised screening programmes. Lancet 1987; 1: 1247–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hakama M, Hristova L. Effect of screening in the Nordic cancer control up to the year 2017. Acta Oncol 1997; 36: 119–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hristova L, Hakama M. Effect of screening for cancer in the Nordic countries on deaths, costs and quality of life up to the year 2017. Acta Oncol 1997; 36 (Suppl 9): 1–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auvinen A, Karjalainen S, Pukkala E. Social class and cancer patient survival in Finland. Am J Epidemiol 1995; 142: 1089–102.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office of Finland. Population census 1970. Vol. 9: Occupation and social position. Helsinki: Central Statistical Office of Finland, 1974.
   Google Scholar
• Rauhala U. The Social Stratification of Finnish Society. Porvoo: Society for Social Policy, 1966. In Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Central Statistical Office of Finland. Classification of socio-economic status. Handbook no. 17. Helsinki: Central Statisti-cal Office of Finland, 1989. In Finnish.
   Google Scholar
• Hakulinen T, Tenkanen L. Regression analysis of relative survival rates. Appl Stat 1987; 36: 309–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leon D, Wilkinson RG. Inequalities in prognosis: socio-eco-nomic differences in cancer and heart disease survival. In: Fox J, ed. Health inequalities in European countries. Aldershot: Gower, 1989: 280–300.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen S. Equity and cancer patient survival [thesis]. Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere, 1991. Acta Uni-versitatis Tamperensis, series A: 316.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers C. Socioeconomic inequalities in cancer survival in the Netherlands and Great Britain: small-area based studies using Cancer Registry data [thesis]. Rotterdam: Erasmus Uni-versity, The Netherlands, 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Karjalainen S. Geographical variation in cancer patient sur-vival in Finland: chance, confounding, or effect of treatment. J Epidemiol Community Health 1990; 44: 210–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karjalainen S, Pukkala E. Social class as a prognostic factor in breast cancer survival. Cancer 1990; 66: 819–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP. Cancer patient survival by socioeconomic status in seven countries: a review for six common cancer sites. J Epidemiol Community Health 1994; 48: 441–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP, Lutz JM, Quinn MJ, Cole-man MP. Deprivation, stage at diagnosis and cancer survival. Int J Cancer 1995; 63: 324–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers CT, Mackenbach JP, Lutz JM, Quinn MJ, Cole-man MP. Deprivation and survival from breast cancer. Br J Cancer 1995; 72: 738–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrijvers CT, Coebergh JW, van der Heijden LH, Macken-bach JP. Socioeconomic status and breast cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands, 1980–1989. Eur J Cancer 1995; 31A: 1660–4.
   Google Scholar
• Schrijvers CT, Coebergh JW, van der Heijden LH, Macken-bach JP. Socioeconomic variation in cancer survival in the southeastern Netherlands, 1980-1989. Cancer 1995; 75: 2946–53.
   Google Scholar
• Dickman PW, Auvinen A, Voutilainen ET, Hakulinen T. Measuring social class differences in cancer patient survival: is it necessary to control for social class differences in general population mortality? A Finnish population-based study. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 727–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickman PW, Gibberd RW, Hakulinen T. Estimating poten-tial savings in cancer deaths by eliminating regional and social class variation in cancer survival in the Nordic countries. J Epidemiol Community Health 1997; 51: 289–98.
   Google Scholar
• Berrino F, Sant M, Verdecchia A, Capocaccia R, Hakulinen T, Esteve J, eds. Survival of cancer patients in Europe: the EUROCARE study. IARC Scientific Publications No. 132. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Tretli S, et al. Prediction of cancer mortality in the Nordic countries up to the years 2000 and 2010. A collaborative study of the five Nordic cancer reg-istries. APMIS 1995; 103 (Suppl 49): 1–163.
   Google Scholar
• Engeland A, Haldorsen T, Dickman PW, et al. Relative survival of cancer patients. A comparison between Denmark and the other Nordic countries. Acta Oncol 1998; 37: 49–59.
   Google Scholar
• Tretli S, Engeland A, Haldorsen T, et al. Prostate cancer-look to Denmark? J Natl Cancer Inst 1996; 88: 128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parkin DM, Hakulinen T. Analysis of survival. In: Jensen OM, Parkin DM, MacLennan R, Muir CS, Skeet RG, eds. Cancer registration: principles and methods. IARC Scientific Publications No. 95. Lyon: International Agency for Re-search on Cancer, 1991: 159–76.
   Google Scholar
• Hakulinen T. On long-term relative survival rates. J Chron Dis 1977; 30: 431–43.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sankila R, Pukkala E, Teppo L. Risk of subsequent malig-nant neoplasms among 470000 cancer patients in Finland, 1953-1991. Int J Cancer 1995; 60: 464–70.
   Google Scholar
• Berrino F, Micheli A, Sant M, Capocaccia R. Interpreting survival differences and trends. Tumori 1997; 83: 9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR, Sosin DM, Wells CK. The Will Rogers phe-nomenon: stage migration and new diagnostic techniques as a source of misleading statistics for survival in cancer. N Engl J Med 1985; 312: 1604–8.
   Google Scholar