Dosimetric advantages of a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy compared with a non-adaptive strategy in cervical cancer radiation therapy

References

• Eifel PJ, Winter K, Morris M, et al. Pelvic irradiation with concurrent chemotherapy versus pelvic and para-aortic irradiation for high-risk cervical cancer: an update of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial (RTOG) 90-01. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:872–880.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franckena M, Stalpers LJA, Koper PCM, et al. Long-term improvement in treatment outcome after radiotherapy and hyperthermia in locoregionally advanced cervix cancer: an update of the Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:1176–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jadon R, Pembroke CA, Hanna CL, et al. A systematic review of organ motion and image-guided strategies in external beam radiotherapy for cervical cancer. Clin Onco. 2014;26:185–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart J, Lim K, Kelly V, et al. Automated weekly replanning for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;78:350–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestergaard A, Søndergaard J, Petersen JB, et al. A comparison of three different adaptive strategies in image-guided radiotherapy of bladder cancer. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:1069–1076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutkenhaus LJ, Visser J, de Jong R, et al. Evaluation of delivered dose for a clinical daily adaptive plan selection strategy for bladder cancer radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 2015;116:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, et al. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer GJ, van der Toorn P-P, Bal M, et al. High precision bladder cancer irradiation by integrating a library planning procedure of 6 prospectively generated SIB IMRT plans with image guidance using lipiodol markers. Radiother Oncol. 2012;105:174–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondar L, Hoogeman M, Mens JW, et al. Toward an individualized target motion management for IMRT of cervical cancer based on model-predicted cervix-uterus shape and position. Radiother Oncol. 2011;99:240–245.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmad R, Bondar L, Voet P, et al. A margin-of-the-day online adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy strategy for cervical cancer provides superior treatment accuracy compared to clinically recommended margins: a dosimetric evaluation. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:1430–1436.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, et al. Quantification of intra-fraction changes during radiotherapy of cervical cancer assessed with pre- and post-fraction Cone Beam CT scans. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:536–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot AJAJ, Schooneveldt G, Wognum S, et al. Generic method for automatic bladder segmentation on cone beam CT using a patient-specific bladder shape model. Med Phys. 2014;41:031707.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondar ML, Hoogeman M, Schillemans W, et al. Intra-patient semi-automated segmentation of the cervix-uterus in CT-images for adaptive radiotherapy of cervical cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:5317–5332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot AJAJ, de Boer P, Crama KF, et al. Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy compared with photon therapy using an adaptive strategy in cervical cancer. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:892–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim K, Small W, Portelance L, et al. Consensus guidelines for delineation of clinical target volume for intensity-modulated pelvic radiotherapy for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:348–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright P, Muren LP, Høyer M, et al. Evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy of bladder cancer by image-based tumour control probability modelling. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:1045–1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondar L, Hoogeman MS, Va´squez Osorio EM, et al. A symmetric nonrigid registration method to handle large organ deformations in cervical cancer patients. Med Phys. 2010;37:3760–3772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veiga C, McClelland J, Moinuddin S, et al. Toward adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck patients: Feasibility study on using CT-to-CBCT deformable registration for "dose of the day" calculations. Med Phys. 2014;41:031703.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley N, Glide-Hurst C, Kim J, et al. Using patient-specific phantoms to evaluate deformable image registration algorithms for adaptive radiation therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2013;14:4363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onozato Y, Kadoya N, Fujita Y, et al. Evaluation of on-board kV cone beam computed tomography based dose calculation with deformable image registration using Hounsfield unit modifications. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:416–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oh S, Stewart J, Moseley J, et al. Hybrid adaptive radiotherapy with on-line MRI in cervix cancer IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2014;110:323–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondar ML, Hoogeman MS, Mens JW, et al. Individualized nonadaptive and online-adaptive intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment strategies for cervical cancer patients based on pretreatment acquired variable bladder filling computed tomography scans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1617–1623.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot AJAJ, de Boer P, Buist MR, et al. Quantification of delineation errors of the gross tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer using pathology data and deformation correction. Acta Oncol. 2014;54:224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer P, Adam JA, Buist MR, et al. Role of MRI in detecting involvement of the uterine internal os in uterine cervical cancer: systematic review of diagnostic test accuracy. Eur J Radiol. 2013;82:e422–e428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontaxis C, Bol GH, Lagendijk JJW, et al. A new methodology for inter- and intrafraction plan adaptation for the MR-linac. Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:7485–7497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar