Bridging imaging and therapy: the role of medical physics in development of precision cancer care

References

• Muren LP, Petersen JB, Hansen J, et al. Medical physics in the Nordic countries: the past, the present and the future. Acta Oncol. 2009;48:165–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiorino C, Muren LP, Clark CH, et al. Expanding the scientific role of medical physics in radiotherapy: time to act. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:401–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muren LP, Jornet N, Georg D, et al. Improving radiotherapy through medical physics developments. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:403–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278:563–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkovic P, Paelinck L, Lievens Y, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer, can we predict when and for whom? Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1438–1444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornqvist S, Hysing LB, Tuomikoski L, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy strategies for pelvic tumors: a systematic review of clinical implementations. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:943–958.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot AJ, de Boer P, Crama KF, et al. Dosimetric advantages of proton therapy compared with photon therapy using an adaptive strategy in cervical cancer. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:892–899.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grau C, Muren LP, Hoyer M, et al. Image-guided adaptive radiotherapy - integration of biology and technology to improve clinical outcome. Acta Oncol. 2008;47:1182–1185.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muren LP, Glimelius B. And they lived happily ever after… The marriage of Nordic Association for Clinical Physics and Acta Oncologica. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:835–837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nystrom H, Blomqvist E, Hoyer M, et al. Particle therapy: a next logical step in the improvement of radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:741–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muren LP, Teras M, Knuuti J. NACP 2014 and the Turku PET symposium: the interaction between therapy and imaging. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:993–996.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabater S, Pastor-Juan Mdel R, Berenguer R, et al. Analysing the integration of MR images acquired in a non-radiotherapy treatment position into the radiotherapy workflow using deformable and rigid registration. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119:179–184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brunt JN. Computed tomography-magnetic resonance image registration in radiotherapy treatment planning. Clin Oncol. 2010;22:688–697.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibfarth S, Monnich D, Welz S, et al. A strategy for multimodal deformable image registration to integrate PET/MR into radiotherapy treatment planning. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:1353–1359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyholm T, Jonsson J. Counterpoint: opportunities and challenges of a magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy work flow. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2014;24:175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim J, Garbarino K, Schultz L, et al. Dosimetric evaluation of synthetic CT relative to bulk density assignment-based magnetic resonance-only approaches for prostate radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson A, Garpebring A, Karlsson M, et al. Improved quality of computed tomography substitute derived from magnetic resonance (MR) data by incorporation of spatial information: potential application for MR-only radiotherapy and attenuation correction in positron emission tomography. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:1369–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen RL, Jensen HR, Brink B. Magnetic resonance only workflow and validation of dose calculations for radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:787–791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemppainen R, Suilamo S, Tuokkola T, et al. Magnetic resonance-only simulation and dose calculation in external beam radiation therapy: a feasibility study for pelvic cancers. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:792–798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haack S, Kallehauge JF, Jespersen SN, et al. Correction of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for brachytherapy of locally advanced cervical cancer. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:1073–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jager EA, Ligtenberg H, Caldas-Magalhaes J, et al. Validated guidelines for tumor delineation on magnetic resonance imaging for laryngeal and hypopharyngeal cancer. Acta Oncol. 2016;55:1305–1312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander L, Langkilde NC, Holmberg M, et al. MRI target delineation may reduce long-term toxicity after prostate radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:809–814.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot AJ, de Boer P, Buist MR, et al. Quantification of delineation errors of the gross tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging in uterine cervical cancer using pathology data and deformation correction. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:224–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damkjær S, Thomsen JB, Petersen SI, et al. A modeling study of functional magnetic resonance imaging to individualize target definition of seminal vesicles for external beam radiotherapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:799–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen P, Haustermans K, Lerut E, et al. Prostate tumor delineation using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: inter-observer variability and pathology validation. Radiother Oncol. 2015;115:186–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torheim T, Malinen E, Hole KH, et al. Autodelineation of cervical cancers using multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and machine learning. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:806–812.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakke KM, Hole KH, Dueland S, et al. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of rectal cancer: tumour volume and perfusion fraction predicts chemoradiotherapy response and survival. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:813–818.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen L, Liu M, Bao J, et al. The correlation between apparent diffusion coefficient and tumor cellularity in patients: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8:e79008.
   Google Scholar
• Horsman MR, Mortensen LS, Petersen JB, et al. Imaging hypoxia to improve radiotherapy outcome. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2012;9:674–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorwarth D, Alber M. Implementation of hypoxia imaging into treatment planning and delivery. Radiother Oncol. 2010;97:172–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblom E, Dasu A, Uhrdin A, et al. Defining the hypoxic target volume based on positron emission tomography for image guided radiotherapy: the influence of the choice of the reference region and conversion function. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:819–825.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoskin PJ. Hypoxia dose painting in prostate and cervix cancer. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1259–1262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnesen MR, Knudtsen IS, Rekstad BL, et al. Dose painting by numbers in a standard treatment planning system using inverted dose prescription maps. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1607–1613.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm AIS, Petersen JBB, Muren LP, et al. Functional image guided dose escalation in gliomas using of state-of-the-art photon vs. proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:826–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muren LP, Rossi C, Hug E, et al. Establishing and expanding the indications for proton and particle therapy. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:459–462.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondlane G, Gubanski M, Lind PA, et al. Comparison of gastric-cancer radiotherapy performed with volumetric modulated arc therapy or single-field uniform dose proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:832–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch K, Andersen AG, Casares-Magaz O, et al. Evaluating the influence of organ motion during photon vs. proton therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer using biological models. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:839–845.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen AG, Casares-Magaz O, Petersen J, et al. Beam angle evaluation to improve inter-fraction motion robustness in pelvic lymph node irradiation with proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:846–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorgisyan J, Perrin R, Lomax AJ, et al. Impact of beam angle choice on pencil beam scanning breath-hold proton therapy for lung lesions. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:853–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar