Clinical efficacy and safety of a highly conformal, supine, hybrid forward and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for craniospinal irradiation

References

• St Clair WH, Adams JA, Bues M, et al. Advantage of protons compared to conventional X-ray or IMRT in the treatment of a pediatric patient with medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:727–734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu X, Bjork-Eriksson T, Nill S, et al. Does electron and proton therapy reduce the risk of radiation induced cancer after spinal irradiation for childhood medulloblastoma? A comparative treatment planning study. Acta Oncol. 2005;44:554–562.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brodin NP, Munck A, Rosenschold P, et al. Radiobiological risk estimates of adverse events and secondary cancer for proton and photon radiation therapy of pediatric medulloblastoma. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:806–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bedford JL, Lee YK, Saran FH, et al. Helical volumetric modulated arc therapy for treatment of craniospinal axis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;83:1047–1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao F, Ramaseshan R, Corns R, et al. A three-isocenter jagged-junction IMRT approach for craniospinal irradiation without beam edge matching for field junctions. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:648–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fogliata A, Bergstrom S, Cafaro I, et al. Cranio-spinal irradiation with volumetric modulated arc therapy: a multi-institutional treatment experience. Radiother Oncol. 2011;99:79–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell RM, Giebeler A, Koontz-Raisig W, et al. Comparison of therapeutic dosimetric data from passively scattered proton and photon craniospinal irradiations for medulloblastoma. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kusters JM, Louwe RJ, van Kollenburg PG, et al. Optimal normal tissue sparing in craniospinal axis irradiation using IMRT with daily intrafractionally modulated junction(s). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:1405–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai Panandiker A, Ning H, Likhacheva A, et al. Craniospinal irradiation with spinal IMRT to improve target homogeneity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:1402–1409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker W, Filion E, Roberge D, et al. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: target volume considerations, dose constraints, and competing risks. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:251–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seppala J, Kulmala J, Lindholm P, et al. A method to improve target dose homogeneity of craniospinal irradiation using dynamic split field IMRT. Radiother Oncol. 2010;96:209–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma DS, Gupta T, Jalali R, et al. High-precision radiotherapy for craniospinal irradiation: evaluation of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy and helical TomoTherapy. BJR. 2009;82:1000–1009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• South M, Chiu JK, Teh BS, et al. Supine craniospinal irradiation using intrafractional junction shifts and field-in-field dose shaping: early experience at Methodist Hospital. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;71:477–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma J, Mazloom A, Teh BS, et al. Comparison of supine and prone craniospinal irradiation in children with medulloblastoma. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2015;5:93–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yom SS, Frija EK, Mahajan A, et al. Field-in-field technique with intrafractionally modulated junction shifts for craniospinal irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:1193–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandurska-Luque A, Piotrowski T, Skrobala A, et al. Prospective study on dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and 3DCRT for craniospinal irradiation – a single institution experience. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2015;20:145–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Myers P, Stathakis S, Mavroidis P, et al. Evaluation of localization errors for craniospinal axis irradiation delivery using volume modulated arc therapy and proposal of a technique to minimize such errors. Radiother Oncol. 2013;108:107–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrie C, Hoffstetter S, Gomez F, et al. Impact of targeting deviations on outcome in medulloblastoma: study of the French Society of Pediatric Oncology (SFOP). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1999;45:435–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chojnacka M, Skowronska-Gardas A. Medulloblastoma in childhood: impact of radiation technique upon the outcome of treatment. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2004;42:155–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miralbell R, Bleher A, Huguenin P, et al. Pediatric medulloblastoma: radiation treatment technique and patterns of failure. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1997;37:523–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick JP, van der Kogel AJ, Schultheiss TE. Radiation dose-volume effects in the spinal cord. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:S42–S49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown AP, Barney CL, Grosshans DR, et al. Proton beam craniospinal irradiation reduces acute toxicity for adults with medulloblastoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;86:277–284.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar