2,040
Views
13
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLES: RADIATION THERAPY

Multi-institutional study of the variability in target delineation for six targets commonly treated with radiosurgery

, , &
Pages 1515-1520 | Received 20 Oct 2017, Accepted 30 Apr 2018, Published online: 22 May 2018

References

  • Sandström H, Nordström H, Johansson J, et al. Variability in target delineation for cavernous sinus meningioma and anaplastic astrocytoma in stereotactic radiosurgery with Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion. Acta Neurochir. 2014;156:2303–2312.
  • Heesters MA, Wijrdeman HK, Struikmans H, et al. Brain tumor delineation based on CT and MR imaging. Implications for radiotherapy treatment planning. Strahlenther Onkol. 1993;169:729–733.
  • Leunens G, Menten J, Weltens C, et al. Quality assessment of medical decision making in radiation oncology: variability in target volume delineation for brain tumors. Radiother Oncol. 1993;29:169–175.
  • Weltens C, Menten J, Feron M, et al. Interobserver variations in gross tumor volume delineation of brain tumors on computed tomography and impact of magnetic resonance imaging. Radiother Oncol. 2001;60:49–59.
  • Buis DR, Lagerwaard FJ, Barkhof F, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain AVMs: role of interobserver variation in target definition on digital subtraction angiography. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;62:246–252.
  • Stanley J, Dunscombe P, Lau H, et al. The effect on contouring variability on dosimetric parameter for brain metastases treated with radiosurgery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;87:924–931.
  • Wee CW, Sung W, Kang HC, et al. Evaluation of variability in target volume delineation for newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a multi-institutional study from the Korean Radiation Oncology Group. Radiat Oncol. 2015;10:137.
  • Logue JP, Sharrock CL, Cowan RA, et al. Clinical variability of target volume description in conformal radiotherapy planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1998;41:929–931.
  • Yamamoto M, Nagata Y, Okajima K, et al. Differences in target outline delineation from CT scans of brain tumours using different methods and different observers. Radiother Oncol. 1999;50:151–156.
  • Sandström H, Chung C, Torrens M, et al. Assessment of organs-at-risk contouring practices in radiosurgery institutions around the world – the first initiative of the OAR Standardization Working Group. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:180–186.
  • Vinod SK, Jameson MG, Min M, et al. Uncertainties in volume delineation in radiation oncology: a systematic review and recommendations for future studies. Radiother Oncol. 2016;121:169–179.
  • Giraud P, Ellen S, Helfre S, et al. Conformal radiotherapy for lung cancer: different delineation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) by radiologists and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol. 2002;62:27–36.
  • Weiss E, Richter S, Krauss T, et al. Conformal radiotherapy planning of cervix carcinoma: differences in the delineation of the clinical target volume. A comparison between gynaecologic and radiation oncologists. Radiother Oncol. 2003;67:87–95.
  • Struikmans H, Wárlám-Rodenhuis C, Stam T, et al. Interobserver variability of clinical target volume delineation of glandular breast tissue and of boost volume in tangential breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol. 2005;76:293–299.
  • Riegel AC, Berson AM, Destian S, et al. Variability of gross tumor volume delineation in head-and-neck cancer using CT and PET/CT fusion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65:726–732.
  • Breen SL, Publocover J, De Silva S, et al. Intraobserver and interobserver variability in GTV delineation on FDG-PET-CT images of head and neck cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:763–770.
  • Petersen RP, Truong PT, Kader HA, et al. Target volume delineation for partial breast radiotherapy planning: clinical characteristics associated with low interobserver concordance. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;69:41–48.
  • Li XA, Tai A, Arthur DW, et al. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Multi-Institutional and Multiobserver study. Variability of target and normal structure delineation for breast cancer radiotherapy: an RTOG multi-institutional and multiobserver study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:944–951.
  • Louie AV, Rodrigues G, Olsthoorn J, et al. Inter-observer and intra-observer reliability for lung cancer target volume delineation in the 4D-CT era. Radiother Oncol. 2010;95:166–171.
  • Rasch CR, Steenbakkers RJ, Fitton I, et al. Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2010;5:21.
  • van Mourik AM, Elkhuizen PH, Minkema D, et al. Multiinstitutional study on target volume delineation variation in breast radiotherapy in the presence of guidelines. Radiother Oncol. 2010;94:286–281.
  • Altorjai G, Fotina I, Lütgendorf-Caucig C, et al. Cone-beam CT-based delineation of stereotactic lung targets: the influence of image modality and target size on interobserver variability. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;82:265–272.
  • Feng M, Demiroz C, Vineberg KA, et al. Normal tissue anatomy for oropharyngeal cancer: contouring variability and its impact on optimization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:245–249.
  • Hoang Duc AK, Eminowicz G, Mendes R, et al. Validation of clinical acceptability of an atlas-based segmentation algorithm for the delineation of organs at risk in head and neck cancer. Med Phys. 2015;42:5027.
  • Njeh CF. Tumor delineation: the weakest link in the search for accuracy in radiotherapy. J Med Phys. 2008;33:136–140.
  • Segedin B, Petric P. Uncertainties in target volume delineation in radiotherapy – are they relevant and what can we do about them? Radiol Oncol. 2016;50:254–262.
  • Sandström H, Dasu A, Toma-Dasu I. Radiobiological framework for the evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery plans for invasive brain tumours. ISRN Oncol. 2013;2013:527251.