Density override in treatment planning to mitigate the dosimetric effect induced by gastrointestinal gas in esophageal cancer radiation therapy

References

• van Hagen P, Hulshof MCCM, van Lanschot JJB, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:2074–2084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins MA, Brooks C, Hansen VN, et al. Cone beam computed tomography-derived adaptive radiotherapy for radical treatment of esophageal cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:378–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins MA, Aitken A, Hansen VN, et al. Cone beam CT verification for oesophageal cancer – impact of volume selected for image registration. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:1183–1190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins MA, Aitken A, Hansen VN, et al. Set-up errors in radiotherapy for oesophageal cancers-is electronic portal imaging or conebeam more accurate? Radiother Oncol. 2011;98:249–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamashita H, Haga A, Hayakawa Y, et al. Patient setup error and day-to-day esophageal motion error analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy. Acta Oncol. 2010;49:485–490.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin P, van der Horst A, de Jong R, et al. Marker-based quantification of interfractional tumor position variation and the use of markers for setup verification in radiation therapy for esophageal cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:412–418.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao X-S, Qiao X, Wu F, et al. Pathological analysis of clinical target volume margin for radiotherapy in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:389–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphuis M, Van Wieringen N, Jin P, et al. PO-1096 Inter-fraction variation of gas volume in the abdominal region during radiotherapy for distal esophageal cancer. Radiother. Oncol. 2015;115:S592–S593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyeng TB, Nordsmark M, Hoffmann L. Dosimetric evaluation of anatomical changes during treatment to identify criteria for adaptive radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1467–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumagai M, Hara R, Mori S, et al. Impact of intrafractional bowel gas movement on carbon ion beam dose distribution in pancreatic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73:1276–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houweling AC, Fukata K, Kubota Y, et al. The impact of interfractional anatomical changes on the accumulated dose in carbon ion therapy of pancreatic cancer patients. Radiother. Oncol. 2016;119:319–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Horst A, Houweling AC, van Tienhoven G, et al. Dosimetric effects of anatomical changes during fractionated photon radiation therapy in pancreatic cancer patients. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2017;18:142–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houweling AC, Crama K, Visser J, et al. Comparing the dosimetric impact of interfractional anatomical changes in photon, proton and carbon ion radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer patients. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62:3051–3064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchard M, McAleer MF, Starkschall G. Impact of gastric filling on radiation dose delivered to gastroesophageal junction tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:292–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Voorde L, Larue R, Persoon L, et al. The influence of gastric filling instructions on dose delivery in patients with oesophageal cancer: a prospective study. Radiother Oncol. 2015;117:442–447.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup M, Söhn M, Yan D, et al. Study of robustness of IMPT and IMRT for prostate cancer against organ movement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75:941–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasaki M, Ikushima H, Tominaga M, et al. Dose impact of rectal gas on prostatic IMRT and VMAT. Jpn J Radiol. 2015;33:723–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger T, Petersen JBB, Lindegaard JC, et al. Impact of bowel gas and body outline variations on total accumulated dose with intensity-modulated proton therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2017;56:1472–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Boer HCJ, Heijmen BJM. eNAL: an extension of the NAL setup correction protocol for effective use of weekly follow-up measurements. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67:1586–1595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates D, Mächler M, Bolker B, et al. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J Stat Soft. 2015;67:51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing Vienna, Austria: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Markar S, Gronnier C, Duhamel A, et al. Salvage surgery after chemoradiotherapy in the management of esophageal cancer: is it a viable therapeutic option? J Clin Onol. 2015;33:3866–3873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Daele E, Ceelen W, Boterberg T, et al. Effect of neoadjuvant radiation dose on surgical and oncological outcome in locally advanced esophageal cancer. Acta Chir Belg. 2015;115:8–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Commission on Radiation Units & Measurements. Prescribing, recording and reporting photon beam threapy (Supplement to ICRU report 50), ICRU Report 62, Bethesda, MD. Bethesda, MD; 1999.
   Google Scholar