Dual-energy material decomposition for cone-beam computed tomography in image-guided radiotherapy

References

• Nijkamp J, Pos FJ, Nuver TT, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography: first clinical results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;70:75–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz DL, Garden AS, Shah SJ, et al. Adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer-dosimetric results from a prospective clinical trial. Radiother Oncol. 2013;106:80–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstrøm UV, Muren LP, Petersen JBB, et al. Evaluation of image quality for different kV cone-beam CT acquisition and reconstruction methods in the head and neck region. Acta Oncol. 2011;50:908–917.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz C, Dedes G, Resch A, et al. Comparing cone-beam CT intensity correction methods for dose recalculation in adaptive intensity-modulated photon and proton therapy for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 2015;54:1651–1657.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siewerdsen JH, Jaffray DA. Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: magnitude and effects of x-ray scatter. Med Phys. 2001;28:220–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stankovic U, Van Herk M, Ploeger LS, et al. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid. Med Phys. 2014;41:061910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang J, Li T, Xing L. SU‐FF‐I‐44: Iterative image reconstruction for CBCT using edge‐preserving prior. Med Phys. 2009;36:2444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu L, Wang J, Xing L. Noise suppression in scatter correction for cone-beam CT. Med Phys. 2009;36:741–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thing RS, Bernchou U, Mainegra-Hing E, et al. Patient-specific scatter correction in clinical cone beam computed tomography imaging made possible by the combination of Monte Carlo simulations and a ray tracing algorithm. Acta Oncol. 2013;52:1477–1483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filograna L, Magarelli N, Leone A, et al. Value of monoenergetic dual-energy CT (DECT) for artefact reduction from metallic orthopedic implants in post-mortem studies. Skeletal Radiol. 2015;44:1287–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto K, Jinzaki M, Tanami Y, et al. Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: improved image quality as compared with that obtained with conventional 120-kVp CT. Radiology. 2011;259:257–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bamberg F, Dierks A, Nikolaou K, et al. Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation. Eur Radiol. 2011;21:1424–1429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chae EJ, Song J-W, Seo JB, et al. Clinical utility of dual-energy CT in the evaluation of solitary pulmonary nodules: initial experience. Radiology. 2008;249(2):671–681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCollough CH, Leng S, Yu L, et al. Dual- and multi-energy CT: principles, technical approaches, and clinical applications. Radiology. 2015;276:637–653.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowman WA, Robar JL, Sattarivand M. Optimizing dual-energy x-ray parameters for the ExacTrac clinical stereoscopic imaging system to enhance soft-tissue imaging. Med Phys. 2017;44:823–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanaka R, Sanada S, Sakuta K, et al. Improved accuracy of markerless motion tracking on bone suppression images: preliminary study for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT). Phys Med Biol. 2015;60:N209–N218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Giles W, Ren L, et al. Implementation of dual-energy technique for virtual monochromatic and linearly mixed CBCTs. Med Phys. 2012;39:6056–6064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elstrøm UV, Olsen SR, Muren LP, et al. The impact of CBCT reconstruction and calibration for radiotherapy planning in the head and neck region – a phantom study. Acta Oncol. 2014;53:1114–1124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasirudin RA, Tachibana R, Näppi JJ, et al. A comparison of material decomposition techniques for dual-energy CT colonography. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2015 Feb 21; 9412; pii: 94124F.
   Google Scholar
• Alvarez RE, Macovski A. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography. Phys Med Biol. 1976;21:733–744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou Y, Silver MD. Analysis of fast kV-switching in dual energy CT using a pre-reconstruction decomposition technique. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2008;69:1313.
   Google Scholar
• Hubbell JH, Seltzer SM. NIST: X-Ray Mass Attenuation Coefficients. Physical Reference Data. 1996 [cited 2019 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.nist.gov/pml/x-ray-mass-attenuation-coefficients
   Google Scholar
• Shope TB, Gagne RM, Johnson GC. A method for describing the doses delivered by transmission x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 1981;8(4):488–495.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primak AN, Giraldo JCR, Eusemann CD, et al. Dual-source dual-energy CT with additional tin filtration: dose and image quality evaluation in phantoms and in vivo. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1164–1174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Leng S, McCollough CH. Dual-Energy CT-based monochromatic imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012;199:S9–S15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, Christner JA, Leng S, et al. Virtual monochromatic imaging in dual-source dual-energy CT: Radiation dose and image quality. Med Phys. 2011;38:6371–6379.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flohr TG, McCollough CH, Bruder H, et al. First performance evaluation of a dual-source CT (DSCT) system. Eur Radiol. 2006;16:256–268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadakis AE, Damilakis J. Fast kVp-switching dual energy contrast-enhanced thorax and cardiac CT: a phantom study on the accuracy of iodine concentration and effective atomic number measurement. Med Phys. 2017;44:4724–4735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar