First system for fully-automated multi-criterial treatment planning for a high-magnetic field MR-Linac applied to rectal cancer

References

• Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ, Overweg J, et al. Integrating a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a 6 MV accelerator: proof of concept. Phys Med Biol. 2009;54(12):N229–N237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaymakers BW, Jurgenliemk-Schulz IM, Bol GH, et al. First patients treated with a 1.5 T MRI-Linac: clinical proof of concept of a high-precision, high-field MRI guided radiotherapy treatment. Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(23):L41–L50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijkamp J, de Jong R, Sonke JJ, et al. Target volume shape variation during hypo-fractionated preoperative irradiation of rectal cancer patients. Radiother Oncol. 2009;92(2):202–209.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerkmeijer LG, Fuller CD, Verkooijen HM, et al. The MRI-linear accelerator consortium: evidence-based clinical introduction of an innovation in radiation oncology connecting researchers, methodology, data collection, quality assurance, and technical development. Front Oncol. 2016;6:215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaijmakers AJ, Raaymakers BW, Lagendijk JJ. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose increase at tissue-air interfaces in a lateral magnetic field due to returning electrons. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50(7):1363–1376.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raaymakers BW, Raaijmakers AJ, Kotte AN, et al. Integrating a MRI scanner with a 6 MV radiotherapy accelerator: dose deposition in a transverse magnetic field. Phys Med Biol. 2004;49(17):4109–4118.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Schoot AJAJ, van den Wollenberg W, Carbaat C, et al. Evaluation of plan quality in radiotherapy planning with an MR-Linac. Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology. 2019;10:19–24.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Breedveld S, Storchi PR, Voet PW, et al. iCycle: integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. Med Phys. 2012;39(2):951–963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S, et al. Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;88(5):1175–1179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Li X, Quan EM, et al. A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(13):3873–3893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdie TG, Dinniwell RE, Fyles A, et al. Automation and intensity modulated radiation therapy for individualized high-quality tangent breast treatment plans. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(3):688–695.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussein M, Heijmen BJM, Verellen D, et al. Automation in intensity modulated radiotherapy treatment planning-a review of recent innovations. Br J Radiol. 2018;91(1092):20180270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijmen B, Voet P, Fransen D, et al. Fully automated, multi-criterial planning for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy - An international multi-center validation for prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2018;128(2):343–348.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voet PW, Dirkx ML, Breedveld S, et al. Toward fully automated multicriterial plan generation: a prospective clinical study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013;85(3):866–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfo AW, Voet PW, Breedveld S, et al. Comparison of VMAT and IMRT strategies for cervical cancer patients using automated planning. Radiother Oncol. 2015;114(3):395–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Gala G, Dirkx MLP, Hoekstra N, et al. Fully automated VMAT treatment planning for advanced-stage NSCLC patients. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017;193(5):402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buergy D, Sharfo AW, Heijmen BJ, et al. Fully automated treatment planning of spinal metastases – a comparison to manual planning of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for conventionally fractionated irradiation. Radiat Oncol. 2017;12(1):33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buschmann M, Sharfo AWM, Penninkhof J, et al. Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol. 2018;194(4):333–342.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfo AWM, Stieler F, Kupfer O, et al. Automated VMAT planning for postoperative adjuvant treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2018;13(1):74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hissoiny S, Ozell B, Bouchard H, et al. GPUMCD: a new GPU-oriented Monte Carlo dose calculation platform. Med Phys. 2011;38(2):754–764.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hissoiny S, Raaijmakers AJ, Ozell B, et al. Fast dose calculation in magnetic fields with GPUMCD. Phys Med Biol. 2011;56(16):5119–5129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breedveld S, Storchi PR, Keijzer M, et al. A novel approach to multi-criteria inverse planning for IMRT. Phys Med Biol. 2007;52(20):6339–6353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi L, Sharfo AW, Aluwini S, et al. First fully automated planning solution for robotic radiosurgery – comparison with automatically planned volumetric arc therapy for prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2018;57(11):1490–1498.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijkoop ST, Langerak TR, Quint S, et al. Clinical implementation of an online adaptive plan-of-the-day protocol for nonrigid motion management in locally advanced cervical cancer IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90(3):673–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beekman C, van Triest B, van Beek S, et al. Margin and PTV volume reduction using a population based library of plans strategy for rectal cancer radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2018;45(10):4345–4354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharfo AW, Breedveld S, Voet PW, et al. Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy. PLoS One. 2016;11(12):e0169202.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Haveren R, Heijmen BJM, Breedveld S. Automatically configuring the reference point method for automated multi-objective treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2019;64(3):035002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Haveren R, Ogryczak W, Verduijn GM, et al. Fast and fuzzy multi-objective radiotherapy treatment plan generation for head and neck cancer patients with the lexicographic reference point method (LRPM). Phys Med Biol. 2017;62(11):4318–4332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi L, Breedveld S, Heijmen BJ, et al. On the beam direction search space in computerized non-coplanar beam angle optimization for IMRT-prostate SBRT. Phys Med Biol. 2012;57(17):5441–5458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohoudi O, Bruynzeel AME, Senan S, et al. Fast and robust online adaptive planning in stereotactic MR-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) for pancreatic cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017;125(3):439–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar