Impact of bowel and rectum air on target dose with robustly optimized intensity-modulated proton therapy plans

References

• Fang P, Mick R, Deville C, et al. A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(7):1118–1127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin LL, Kirk M, Scholey J, et al. Initial report of pencil beam scanning proton therapy for posthysterectomy patients with gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;95(1):181–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grewal AS, Schonewolf C, Min EJ, et al. Four-year outcomes from a prospective phase II clinical trial of moderately hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2019;105(4):713–722.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos PMG, Barsky AR, Hwang WT, et al. Comparative toxicity outcomes of proton-beam therapy versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer in the postoperative setting. Cancer. 2019;125(23):4278–4293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trofimov A, Nguyen PL, Efstathiou JA, et al. Interfractional variations in the setup of pelvic bony anatomy and soft tissue, and their implications on the delivery of proton therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2011;80(3):928–937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao W, Krasin MJ, Farr JB, et al. Feasibility study of range-based registration using daily cone beam CT for intensity-modulated proton therapy. Med Phys. 2018;45(3):1191–1203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu M, Kaiser A, Mishra MV, et al. Multiple CT robust optimization to account for random anatomic density variations during intensity-modulated proton therapy. Advances in Radiat Oncol. 2019. DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2019.12.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gay HA, Barthold HJ, O'Meara E, et al. Pelvic normal tissue contouring guidelines for radiation therapy: a Radiation Therapy Oncology Group consensus panel atlas. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2012;83(3):e353–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Report 24, Journal of the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Volume os13, Issue 1, 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Kumagai M, Hara R, Mori S, et al. Impact of intrafractional bowel gas movement on carbon ion beam dose distribution in pancreatic radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;73(4):1276–1281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinkawa M, Berneking V, Schlenter M, et al. Quality of life after radiation therapy for prostate cancer with a hydrogel spacer: 5-year results. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(2):374–377.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gravgaard Andersen A, Casares-Magaz O, Petersen J, et al. Beam angle evaluation to improve inter-fraction motion robustness in pelvic lymph node irradiation with proton therapy. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(6):846–852.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger T, Petersen JBB, Lindegaard JC, et al. Impact of bowel gas and body outline variations on total accumulated dose with intensity-modulated proton therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients. Acta Oncol. 2017;56(11):1472–1478.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cubillos-Mesías M, Troost EGC, Lohaus F, et al. Including anatomical variations in robust optimization for head and neck proton therapy can reduce the need of adaptation. Radiother Oncol. 2019;131:127–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Li H, Zhu XR, et al. Multiple-CT optimization of intensity-modulated proton therapy - Is it possible to eliminate adaptive planning? Radiother Oncol. 2018;128(1):167–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Dong L, Lee AK, et al. Effect of anatomic motion on proton therapy dose distributions in prostate cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;67(2):620–629.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukup M, Söhn M, Yan D, et al. Study of robustness of IMPT and IMRT for prostate cancer against organ movement. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009;75(3):941–949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar