2,747
Views
27
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles: Medical Oncology

Impact of pathological tumor response after CROSS neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery on long-term outcome of esophageal cancer: a population-based study

ORCID Icon, , , , , , ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 497-504 | Received 18 Oct 2020, Accepted 27 Dec 2020, Published online: 25 Jan 2021

References

  • Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.
  • Arnold M, Laversanne M, Brown LM, et al. Predicting the future burden of esophageal cancer by histological subtype: international trends in incidence up to 2030. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112(8):1247–1255.
  • Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, et al. Oesophageal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2016;27(Suppl. 5):v50–v57.
  • Ajani JA, D'Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, et al. Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2019;17(7):855–883.
  • Nygaard K, Hagen S, Hansen HS, et al. Pre-operative radiotherapy prolongs survival in operable esophageal carcinoma: a randomized, multicenter study of pre-operative radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The second Scandinavian trial in esophageal cancer. World J Surg. 1992;16(6):1104–1109.
  • van Hagen P, Hulshof MC, van Lanschot JJ, et al. Preoperative chemoradiotherapy for esophageal or junctional cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(22):2074–2084.
  • Burmeister BH, Smithers BM, Gebski V, et al. Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005;6(9):659–668.
  • Shapiro J, van Lanschot JJ, Hulshof MC, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for oesophageal or junctional cancer (CROSS): long-term results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(9):1090–1098.
  • Blum Murphy M, Xiao L, Patel VR, et al. Pathological complete response in patients with esophageal cancer after the trimodality approach: the association with baseline variables and survival—The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center experience. Cancer. 2017;123(21):4106–4113.
  • Chao YK, Chen HS, Wang BY, et al. Factors associated with survival in patients with oesophageal cancer who achieve pathological complete response after chemoradiotherapy: a nationwide population-based study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017;51(1):155–159.
  • Francoual J, Lebreton G, Bazille C, et al. Is pathological complete response after a trimodality therapy, a predictive factor of long-term survival in locally-advanced esophageal cancer? Results of a retrospective monocentric study. J Visc Surg. 2018;155(5):365–374.
  • Al-Sukhni E, Gabriel E, Attwood K, et al. No survival difference with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy in resectable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: results from the National Cancer Data Base. J Am Coll Surg. 2016;223(6):784–792e1.
  • van der Werf LR, Dikken JL, van der Willik EM, et al. Time interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery for oesophageal or junctional cancer: a nationwide study. Eur J Cancer. 2018;91:76–85.
  • Groth SS, Burt BM, Farjah F, et al. Prognostic value of neoadjuvant treatment response in locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019;157(4):1682–1693.e1.
  • Lee A, Wong AT, Schwartz D, et al. Is there a benefit to prolonging the interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy in esophageal cancer? Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;102(2):433–438.
  • Azab B, Amundson JR, Picado O, et al. Impact of chemoradiation-to-surgery interval on pathological complete response and short- and long-term overall survival in esophageal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(3):861–868.
  • Klevebro F, Lindblad M, Johansson J, et al. Outcome of neoadjuvant therapies for cancer of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction based on a national data registry. Br J Surg. 2016;103(13):1864–1873.
  • Luc G, Gronnier C, Lebreton G, et al. Predictive factors of recurrence in patients with pathological complete response after esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer: a multicenter study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(S3):1357–1364.
  • Vallbohmer D, Holscher AH, DeMeester S, et al. A multicenter study of survival after neoadjuvant radiotherapy/chemotherapy and esophagectomy for ypT0N0M0R0 esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2010;252(5):744–749.
  • Yang C, Zhang J, Ding M, et al. Ki67 targeted strategies for cancer therapy. Clin Transl Oncol. 2018;20(5):570–575.
  • Huang JX, Yan W, Song ZX, et al. Relationship between proliferative activity of cancer cells and clinicopathological factors in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11(19):2956–2959.
  • Auditing DIfC. Factsheet indicatoren Slokdarm-en maagcarcinoom (DUCA); 2019; [cited 2019 Mar 1]. Available from: https://dica.nl/duca/documenten
  • Izbicki JR, Hosch SB, Pichlmeier U, et al. Prognostic value of immunohistochemically identifiable tumor cells in lymph nodes of patients with completely resected esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1997;337(17):1188–1194.
  • Komukai S, Nishimaki T, Suzuki T, et al. Significance of immunohistochemical nodal micrometastasis as a prognostic indicator in potentially curable oesophageal carcinoma. Br J Surg. 2002;89(2):213–219.
  • Vazquez-Sequeiros E, Wang L, Burgart L, et al. Occult lymph node metastases as a predictor of tumor relapse in patients with node-negative esophageal carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;122(7):1815–1821.
  • Heeren PA, Kelder W, Blondeel I, et al. Prognostic value of nodal micrometastases in patients with cancer of the gastro-oesophageal junction. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2005;31(3):270–276.
  • Bleaney CW, Barrow M, Hayes S, et al. The relevance and implications of signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. J Clin Pathol. 2018;71(3):201–206.
  • Patel VR, Hofstetter WL, Correa AM, et al. Signet ring cells in esophageal adenocarcinoma predict poor response to preoperative chemoradiation. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(3):1064–1071.
  • Chen L, Liu X, Gao L, et al. The clinicopathological features and prognosis of signet ring cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a 10-year retrospective study in China. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0176637.
  • van Hootegem SJM, Smithers BM, Gotley DC, et al. The impact of signet ring cell differentiation on outcome in patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019;26(8):2375–2384.
  • Machlowska J, Pucułek M, Sitarz M, et al. State of the art for gastric signet ring cell carcinoma: from classification, prognosis, and genomic characteristics to specified treatments. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:2151–2161.
  • Qin Q, Xu H, Liu J, et al. Does timing of esophagectomy following neoadjuvant chemoradiation affect outcomes? A meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2018;59:11–18.
  • Nilsson K, Klevebro F, Rouvelas I, et al. Surgical morbidity and mortality from the multicenter randomized controlled NeoRes II Trial: standard versus prolonged time to surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;272(5):684–689.
  • Koëter M, van Steenbergen LN, Lemmens VE, et al. Hospital of diagnosis and probability to receive a curative treatment for oesophageal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014;40(10):1338–1345.
  • Puetz K, Bollschweiler E, Semrau R, et al. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer – which response grading system best impacts prognostic discrimination? Histopathology. 2019;74(5):731–743.
  • Klevebro F, Tsekrekos A, Low D, et al. Relevant issues in tumor regression grading of histopathological response to neoadjuvant treatment in adenocarcinomas of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Dis Esophagus. 2020;33(6).
  • Karamitopoulou E, Thies S, Zlobec I, et al. Assessment of tumor regression of esophageal adenocarcinomas after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: comparison of 2 commonly used scoring approaches. Am J Surg Pathol. 2014;38(11):1551–1556.
  • Barbour AP, Jones M, Gonen M, et al. Refining esophageal cancer staging after neoadjuvant therapy: importance of treatment response. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008;15(10):2894–2902.
  • Tong DK, Law S, Kwong DL, et al. Histological regression of squamous esophageal carcinoma assessed by percentage of residual viable cells after neoadjuvant chemoradiation is an important prognostic factor. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(8):2184–2192.
  • Burt BM, Groth SS, Sada YH, et al. Utility of adjuvant chemotherapy after neoadjuvant chemoradiation and esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2017;266(2):297–304.
  • Mokdad AA, Yopp AC, Polanco PM, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs postoperative observation following preoperative chemoradiotherapy and resection in gastroesophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(1):31–38.
  • Stroes CI, Schokker S, Creemers A, et al. Phase II feasibility and biomarker study of neoadjuvant trastuzumab and pertuzumab with chemoradiotherapy for resectable human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive esophageal adenocarcinoma: TRAP study. J Clin Oncol. 2019;38(5):462–471.
  • Kelly RJ, Lockhart AC, Jonker DJ, et al. CheckMate 577: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study of nivolumab (Nivo) or placebo in patients (Pts) with resected lower esophageal (E) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(4_Suppl.):TPS212.