ASSESSMENT OF FUNCTIONAL OUTCOME AFTER NERVE REPAIR IN A LONGITUDINAL COHORT

REFERENCES

• Almquist E, Eeg-Olofs son O. Sensory-nerve-conduction and two-point discrimination in sutured nerves. J Bone Joint Surg 1970; 52A: 791–796.
   Google Scholar
• Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medi-cine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 1983; 32: 307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Bell-Krotoski JA. Sensibility testing: current concepts. In: Hunter JM, Mackin EJ, Callahan AD, eds. Rehabilitation of the hand. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1995: 129–152.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsma JW, Schreuders JA, Birke JA, Piefer A, Oostendorp RAB. Manual muscle testing. Intra-and interobserver reliability of the intrinsic muscles of the hand. J Hand Ther 1995; 8: 185–190.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell DA, Kay SP. What is cold intolerance? J Hand Surg 1998; 23B: 3–5.
   Google Scholar
• Chassard M, Pham E, Comtet H. Two-point discrimination tests versus functional sensory recovery in both median and ulnar nerve complete transections. J Hand Surg 1993; 18B: 790–796.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behaviour sciences. New York: Academic Press, 1977.
   Google Scholar
• Collins ED, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Weisen-born SA. Long-term follow-up evaluation of cold sensitivity following nerve injury. J Hand Surg 1996; 21A: 1078–1085.
   Google Scholar
• Helton AL. Sensibility and re-education of sensation in the hand. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Ewing-Fess E. The need for reliability and validity in hand assessment instruments. J Hand Surg 1986; 11A: 621–623.
   Google Scholar
• Guyon G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987; 40: 171–178.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin MS, Gilbert SEA, Terenghi G, Smith RW, Green CJ. Cold intolerance following peripheral nerve injury. J Hand Surg 1997; 22B: 308–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kallio PK, Vastamai M. An analysis of the results of late reconstruction of 132 median nerves. J Hand Surg 1993; 18B: 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Kaziz LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989; 27: 178–189.
   Google Scholar
• Lundborg G. Nerve injury and repair. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Lundborg G, Rosen B. Rationale for quantitative sensory tests in hand surgery. In: Boivie J, Hansson P. Lindblom U, eds. Touch, tempera-ture, and pain in health and disease, mechanisms and assessments. Seattle: IASP Press, 1994: 151–162.
   Google Scholar
• Lundborg G, Rosen B, Dahlin L, Danielsson N, Holmberg J. Tubular versus conventional repair of median and ulnar nerves in the human forearm: early results from a prospective, rando-mized, clinical study. J Hand Surg 1997; 22A: 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Marsh D:. The validation of measures of outcome following suture of divided peripheral nerves supplying the hand. J Hand Surg 1990; 15B: 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Kashman N, Volland G, Weber K, Dowe M, Rogers S. Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1985; 66: 69–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg 1984; 9A: 222–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medical Research Council (MRC) Nerve Injuries Committee. In: Seddon HJ, ed. Peripheral nerve injuries: results of nerve suture. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office, 1954.
   Google Scholar
• Miller RG:. Simultaneous statistical inference. New York: Springer Verlag, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Moberg E. Two-point discrimination test. A valuable part of hand surgical rehabilitation in tetreplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990; 22: 127–134.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Moberg E. The unsolved problem-how to test the functional value of hand sensibility. J Hand Ther 1991; 4: 105–110.
   Google Scholar
• Rosen B. Recovery of sensory and motor function after nerve repair: a rationale for evaluation. J Hand Ther 1996; 9: 315–327.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosen B, Lundborg G, Dahlin LB, Holmberg J, Karlsson B. Nerve repair: correlation of restitu-tion of functional sensibility with specific cognitive capacities. J Hand Surg 1994; 19B: 452–458.
   Google Scholar
• Sollerman C. Grip function of the hand. Analysis, evaluation and a new test method. Thesis. Section for Hand Surgery, Department of Ortho-paedic Surgery, Sahlgrenska Hospital, University of Goteborg, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Sollerman C, Ejeskär A. Sollerman hand function test. A standardised method and its use in tetraplegic patients. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 1995; 29: 167–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stratford PW, Hinkley JM, Riddle DL. Health status measures: strategies and analytic methods for assessing change scores. Phys Ther 1996; 76: 1109–1123.
   Google Scholar
• Sunderland S. Nerve injuries and their repair. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, 1991: 305–306.
   Google Scholar
• Trombly C. Anticipating the future: assessment of occupational function. Am J Occup Ther 1993; 47: 253–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbrugge LM, Jette AM. The disablement process. Soc Sci Med 1993; 38: 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall JT, Kaas JH, Sur M, Nelson RJ, Fellman DJ, Merzenich MM. Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans. J Neurosci 1986; 6: 218–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classi-fication of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handi-caps. Geneva: WHO: 1980.
   Google Scholar