189
Views
14
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patient-reported outcomes after breast reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps

, MD, , , &
Pages 173-177 | Published online: 08 Jul 2009

References

  • Holmström H. The free abdominoplasty flap and its use in breast reconstruction: an experimental study and clinical case report. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg 1979; 13: 423–7
  • Hartrampf CR, Schefland M, Black PW. Breast reconstruction with a transverse abdominal island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 1982; 69: 216–25
  • Friedman RJ, Argenta LC, Anderson R. Deep inferior epigastric free flap for breast reconstruction after radical mastectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1985; 76: 455–8
  • Allen RJ, Treece P. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 32–8
  • Blondeel PN, Vanderstraeten GG, Monstrey SJ, et al. The donor site morbidity of the free DIEP flaps and free TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 1997; 50: 322–30
  • Gill PS, Hunt JP, Guerra AB, et al. A 10-year retrospective review of 758 DIEP flaps for breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004; 113: 1153–60
  • Tønseth KA, Günther A, Brabrand K, Hokland BM. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the rectus abdominis muscle after breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap. Ann Plast Surg 2005; 54: 483–6
  • Cano SJ, Browne JP, Lamping DL. Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: current approaches and future directions. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 1–11
  • Spilker G, Stark GB. Quality of life considerations in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Theor Surg 1991; 6: 216–20
  • Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ. Surgical-technical aspects of the free DIEP flap for breast reconstruction. Oper Tech Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 6: 27–37
  • Ware JE, Jr, Snow KK, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey. Manual and interpretation guide. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston 1993
  • McHorney CA, Ware JE, Jr, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care 1994; 32: 40–66
  • Loge JH, Kaasa S. Short Form 36 (SF-36) health survey: normative data from the general Norwegian population. Scand J Soc Med 1998; 26: 250–8
  • Veiga DF, Sabino Neto M, Ferreira LM, et al. Quality of life outcomes after pedicled TRAM flap delayed breast reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg 2004; 57: 252–7
  • Cocquyt VF, Blondeel PN, Depypere HT, et al. Better cosmetic results and comparable quality of life after skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate autologous breast reconstruction compared to breast conservative treatment. Br J Plast Surg 2003; 56: 462–70
  • Alderman AK, Wilkins EG, Lowery JC, Kim M, Davis JA. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 769–76
  • Sprangers MA, Schwartz CE. Integrating response shift into health-related quality of life research: a theoretical model. Soc Sci Med 1999; 48: 1507–15
  • Edsander-Nord Å, Brandberg Y, Wickman M. Quality of life, patients’ satisfaction, and aesthetic outcome after pedicled or free TRAM flap breast surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1142–53
  • Roth RS, Lowery JC, Davis J, Wilkins EG. Quality of life and affective distress in women seeking immediate versus delayed breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 993–1002
  • Kovacs L, Papadopulos NA, Ammar SA, et al. Clinical outcome and patients’ satisfaction after simultaneous bilateral breast reconstruction with free transverse rectus abdominis muscle (TRAM) flap. Ann Plast Surg 2004; 53: 199–204
  • Elder EE, Brandberg Y, Björklund T, et al. Quality of life and patient satisfaction in breast cancer patients after immediate breast reconstruction: a prospective study. Breast 2005; 14: 201–8
  • King MT. The interpretation of scores from the EORTC quality of life questionnaire QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 555–67
  • Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Academic Press, New York 1977
  • Norman GR, Sloan JA, Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care 2003; 41: 582–92
  • Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Goodacre T. Patients’ health-related quality of life before and after aesthetic surgery. Br J Plast Surg 1996; 49: 433–8

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.