The Effects of Media and their Logic on Legitimacy Sources within Local Governance Networks: A Three-Case Comparative Study

References

• Altheide, D.L. and Snow, R.P., 1979. Media logic. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H.P., ed., 2003. Governance as social and political communication. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F.R. and Jones, B.D., 2009. Agendas and instability in American politics. 2nd ed. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Bonß, W., and Lau, C., 2003. The theory of reflexive modernization: problematic, hypothesis and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society, 20 (2), 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V. and Edwards, A., 2007. Legitimacy and democracy: a conceptual framework. In: V. Bekkers, et al., eds. Governance and the democratic deficit. Hampshire: Ashgate, 35–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, W.L., 2009. News: the politics of illusion. 8th ed. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Brants, K. and Neijens, P., 1998. The infotainment of politics. Political Communication, 15, 149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brants, K. and van Praag, P., 2006. Signs of media logic. Half a century of political communication in the Netherlands. Javnost – The Public, 13 (1), 25–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, R.W. and Elder, C.D., 1983. Participation in American politics: the dynamics of agenda-building. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., 1989. Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In: A. Hamlin and P. Pettit, eds. The good polity: normative analysis of the state. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 17–34.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, F.L., et al., 1983. Media and agenda setting: effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 47 (1), 16–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, T., 2005. Governing with the news. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crozier, M., 2008. Listening, learning, steering: new governance, communication and interactive policy formation. Policy & Politics, 36 (1), 3–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Currall, S.C. and Towler, A.J., 2003. Research methods in management and organizational research: towards an integration of qualitative and quantitative techniques. In: A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie, eds. Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 513–526.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., 2002. Public relations democracy: public relations, politics and the mass media in Britain. Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A., 2007. The mediation of power: a critical introduction. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., 2007. Networks and democratic ideals: equality, freedom, and communication. In: E. Sørensen and J. Torfing, eds. Theories of democratic network governance. London: Palgrave, 262–273.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J., 2010. Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. and Teisman, G.R., 2011. Symposium on water governance. Prologue: water governance as a government’s actions between the reality of fragmentation and the need for integration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77 (1), 5–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., Klijn, E.H., and van Buuren, M.W., 2013. Connective capacities of network managers: a comparative study of management styles in eight regional governance networks. Public Management Review, 15 (1), 131–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entman, R.M., 2007. Framing bias: media in the distribution of power. Journal of Communication, 157, 163–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eshuis, J. and Klijn, E.H., 2012. Branding in governance and public management. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Esser, F. and Matthes, J., 2013. Mediatization effect on political news, political actors, political decisions, and political audiences. In: H. Kriesi, et al., eds. Democracy in the age of globalization and mediatization. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., 2003. Reframing public policy; discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graber, D., 2003. The media and democracy: beyond stereotypes. Annual Review of Political Science, 6, 139–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graber, D., 2004. Mediated politics and citizenship in the twenty-first century. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 545–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, J., 2006. Political communication in media society: does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 2003. Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M.A., 2009. Authoritative governance: policy-making in the age of mediatization. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Held, D., 2006. Models of democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjarvard, S., 2008. The mediatization of society: a theory of the media as agents of social and cultural change. Nordicom Review, 29 (2), 105–134.
   Google Scholar
• Hurrelmann, A., et al., 2009. Why the democratic nation-state is still legitimate: a study of media discourses. European Journal of Political Research, 48, 483–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, S., 2009. Aan de schandpaal of succesverhaal? Over verantwoording van een publieke organisatie aan media. [Pillorying an organization or success stories? About accountability of a public organization in the media] Master’s thesis. University of Utrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinnijenhuis, J., van Hoof, A.M.J., and Oegema, D., 2006. Negative news and the sleeper effect of distrust. Harvard International Journal of Press and Politics, 11 (2), 86–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.H., 2011. Democratic legitimacy criteria in interactive governance and their empirical application. In: J. Torfing and P. Triantafillou, eds. Interactive policy-making, metagovernance and democracy. Essex: ECPR Press, 205–225.
   Google Scholar
• Klijn, E.H., Steijn, B., and Edelenbos, J., 2010. The impact of network management on outcomes in governance networks. Public Administration, 88 (4), 1063–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koppenjan, J. and Klijn, E.H., 2004. Managing uncertainties in networks: a network approach to problem solving and decision making. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Korthagen, I.A., 2013. Who gets on the news? The relation between media biases and different actors in news reporting on complex policy processes. Public Management Review. doi:10.1080/14719037.2013.822529
   Google Scholar
• Kunelius, R. and Reunanen, E., 2012. Media in political power: a Parsonian view on differentiated mediatization of Finnish decision makers. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 17 (1), 56–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louw, E., 2007. The media and political process. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N., 1975. Legitimation durch verfaren [Procedural legitimation]. Darmstad: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Manin, B., 1987. On legitimacy and political deliberation. Political Theory, 15 (3), 338–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzoleni, G. and Schulz, W., 1999. ‘Mediatization’ of politics: a challenge for democracy? Political Communication, 16 (3), 247–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCombs, M.E., 2004. Setting the agenda: the mass media and public opinion. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, T., 2002. Media democracy: how the media colonize politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulos, Y., 2003. Cooperative forms of governance: problems in democratic accountability in complex environments. European Journal of Political Research, 42, 473–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkinson, J., 2006. Rickety bridges: using the media in deliberative democracy. British Journal of Political Science, 36 (1), 175–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, T.E., 2000. Doing well and doing good: how soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy – and what news outlets can do about it. Cambridge, MA: Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B.G., 2010. Bureaucracy and democracy. Public Organization Review, 10, 209–222.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., ed., 2000. Debating governance: authority, democracy, and steering. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reunanen, E., Kunelis, R., and Noppari, E., 2010. Mediatization in context: consensus culture, media and decision making in the 21st century, the case of Finland. Communications, 35 (3), 287–307.
   Google Scholar
• Rohlinger, D.A., 2007. American media and deliberative democratic processes. Sociological Theory, 25 (2), 122–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schudson, M., 2009. Why democracies need an unlovable press. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Semetko, H.A. and Valkenburg, P.M., 2000. Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50 (2), 93–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoemaker, P.J. and Reese, S.D., 1996. Mediating the message: theories of influences on mass media content. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., 2002. Democratic theory and network governance. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 24 (4), 693–720.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E. and Torfing, J., 2005. The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28, 195–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spörer-Wagner, D. and Marcinkowski, F., 2010. Is talk always silver and silence golden? The mediatisation of political bargaining. Javnost – The Public, 17 (2), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. and Esser, F., 2009. Shaping politics: mediatization and media interventionism. In: K. Lundby, ed. Mediatization: concept, changes, consequences. New York: Peter Lang, 205–224.
   Google Scholar
• Strömbäck, J. and Shehata, A., 2007. Structural biases in British and Swedish election news coverage. Journalism Studies, 8 (5), 798–815.
   Google Scholar
• Teisman, G.R., 2000. Models for research into decision-making processes: on phases, streams and decision-making rounds. Public Administration, 78 (4), 937–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terkildsen, N., Schnell, F.I., and Ling, C., 1998. Interest groups, the media, and policy debate formation: an analysis of message structure, rhetoric and source cues. Political Communication, 15, 45–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Buuren, A.W., Edelenbos, J., and Klijn, E.H., 2010. Gebiedsontwikkeling in woelig water. Over water governance bewegend tussen adaptief waterbeheer en ruimtelijke besluitvorming. [Area development in turbulent water. About water governance moving between adaptive water management and spatial planning]. Den Haag: Lemma.
   Google Scholar
• van Kersbergen, K. and van Waarden, F., 2004. ‘Governance’ as a bridge between disciplines. European Journal of Political Research, 43 (2), 143–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meerkerk, I., Edelenbos, J., and Klijn, E.H., forthcoming. Connective management and governance network performance: the mediating role of throughput legitimacy. Findings from survey research on complex water projects in The Netherlands. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., 2007. Governance, complexity, and democratic participation: how citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighborhood decline. American Review of Public Administration, 37 (1), 17–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, M.E., 2009. Governance-driven democratization. Critical Policy Studies, 3, 3–13.
   Google Scholar