Does Size Still Matter? An Empirical Analysis of the Effectiveness of Victorian Local Authorities

References

• Andrews, R. and Boyne, G., 2009. Size, structure and administrative overheads: an empirical analysis of English local authorities. Urban Studies, 46 (4), 739–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R. and Van De Walle, S., 2012. New public management and citizens’ perceptions of local service efficiency, responsiveness, equity and effectiveness. Working Paper 7. Rotterdam: Coordinating for Cohesion in the Public Sector of the Future [COCOPS].
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., et al., 2010. Assessing organizational performance: exploring differences between internal and external measures. International Public Management Journal, 13 (2), 105–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., Boyne, G., and Walker, R., 2011. The impact of management on administrative and survey measures of organizational performance. Public Management Review, 13 (2), 227–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Audit Office of NSW, 2012. New South Wales auditor-general’s report. Performance audit. Department of Premier and Cabinet, Division of Local Government. Sydney: Auditor-General New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2010. National regional profile (2006–10). Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Communications and Media Authority, 2007. Telemarketing and research calls industry standard. Australian Communications and Media Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G., 1996. Scale, performance and the new public management: an empirical analysis of local authority services. Management Studies, 33 (6), 809–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, K. and Coulter, P., 1983. Subjective and objective measures of police service delivery. Public Administration Review, 43 (1), 50–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J. and Dollery, B., 2002. Do economies of scale exist in Australian local government? A review of the research evidence. Urban Policy and Research, 20 (4), 391–414.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, P., 2002. They’re not like us: the de-amalgamation process of Delatite Shire. Unpublished paper presented to the Jubilee Conference of the Australian Political Science Association. Canberra: Australian National University.
   Google Scholar
• DeHoog, R., Lowery, D., and Lyons, W., 1990. Citizen satisfaction with local governance: a test of individual, jurisdictional, and city specific explanations. Journal of Politics, 52 (3), 807–837.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deloitte Access Economics, 2011. Local government structural reform in Tasmania. Tasmania: Property Council of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• DRCDV, 2010a. Annual community satisfaction survey. Melbourne: Department of Planning and Community Development.
   Google Scholar
• DRCDV, 2010b. 2005–2010 Source data and definition. Melbourne: Department of Planning and Community Development.
   Google Scholar
• Disability Discrimination Act. 1992. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Kortt, M., and Grant, B., 2011. A normative model for local government de-amalgamation in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 46 (4), 601–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Grant, B., and Kortt, M., 2012. Councils in cooperation: shared services and Australian local government. Sydney: Federation Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J., 2013. Is bigger better in local government in the eyes of Victorian citizens? Working Paper 01–2013. Armidale: Centre for Local Government, University of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J., Kortt, M., and Dollery, B., 2012. Economies of scale and local government expenditure: evidence from Australia. Administration & Society. Online First, 1–22. doi:10.1177/0095399712469191
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. and Xiao, Y., 2013. Annexation, local government spending and the complicating role of density. Urban Affairs Review, 45 (2), 147–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R. and Williams, D., 2008. The impact of population density on municipal government expenditures. Public Finance Review, 36 (3), 359–373.
   Google Scholar
• Holcombe, R. and Williams, D., 2009. Are there economies of scale in municipal government expenditures? Public Finance and Management, 9 (3), 416–438.
   Google Scholar
• James, O., 2007. Evaluating the expectations disconfirmation and expectations anchoring approaches to citizen satisfaction with local public services. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 107–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J. and Swindell, D., 2002. A multiple indicator approach to municipal service evaluation: correlating performance measurement and citizen satisfaction across jurisdictions. Public Administration Review, 62 (5), 610–621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H., 1992. Population growth, density and the costs of providing public services. Urban Studies, 29 (2), 273–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lannoo, S., et al., 2011. Differences in social capital between urban and rural environments. Journal of Urban Affairs, 34 (4), 373–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Local Government Reform Commission, 2007. Report of the local government reform commission, vol 1. Brisbane: Local Government Reform Commission.
   Google Scholar
• McGrath, R., 2009. A discourse analysis of Australian local government recreation and sport plans provision for people with disabilities. Public Management Review, 11 (4), 477–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouritzen, P., 1989. City size and citizen’s satisfaction: two competing theories revisited. European Journal of Political Research, 17, 661–688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R., 1984. Linking objective and subjective measures of performance. Public Administration Review, 44 (2), 118–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasser, S., 2007. Democracy and local government – the Queensland experience. The Sydney Papers Spring, 2007, 83–92.
   Google Scholar
• Pricewaterhouse Coopers. 2006. National financial sustainability study of local government. Commissioned by the Australian local government association. Sydney: Pricewaterhouse Coopers.
   Google Scholar
• Roch, C. and Poister, T., 2006. Citizens, accountability, and service satisfaction: the influence of expectations. Urban Affairs Review, 41 (3), 292–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipak, B., 1979. Citizen satisfaction with urban services: potential misuse as a performance indicator. Public Administration Review, 39 (1), 46–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stipak, B. and Hensler, C., 1982. Statistical inference in contexual analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 26 (1), 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swindell, D. and Kelly, J., 2000. Linking citizen satisfaction data to performance measures a preliminary evaluation. Public Performance & Management Review, 24 (1), 30–52.
   Google Scholar
• Swindell, D. and Kelly, J., 2005. Performance measurement versus city service satisfaction: intra-city variations in quality? Social Science Quarterly, 86 (3), 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van De Walle, S. and Van Ryzin, G., 2011. The order of questions in a survey on citizen satisfaction with public services: lessons from a split-ballot experiment. Public Administration, 89 (4), 1436–1450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G., 2004. Expectations, performance, and citizen satisfaction with urban services. Policy Analysis and Management, 23 (3), 433–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar