Regenerating the City: People, Politics, Power and the Public Sphere

References

• Abram, S. 2007. “Participatory Depoliticisation: The Bleeding Heart of Neo-Liberalism.” In Cultures et Pratiques Participatives: Perspectives Comparatives, edited by C. Neveu. Paris: l’Harmattan.
   Google Scholar
• Alinsky, S. 1989. Reveille for Radicals. New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bunyan, P. 2013. “Partnership, the Big Society and Community Organizing: Between Romanticizing, Problematizing and Politicizing Community.” Community Development Journal 48 (1): 119–133. doi:10.1093/cdj/bss014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunyan, P. 2014. “Re-conceptualizing Civil Society: Towards a Radical Understanding.” VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations 25 (2): 538–552. doi:10.1007/s11266-013-9352-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camden. 2013. Camden Equality Taskforce – Final Report, May 2013. http://camden.gov.uk/equalitytaskforce.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, E. 2003. Roots for Radicals. New York: The Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Crick, B. 1992. In Defence of Politics. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, J. S. 2007. “The Limits of Partnership: An Exit-Action Strategy for Local Democratic Inclusion.” Political Studies 55: 779–800. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00677.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFilippis, J., R. Fisher, and E. Shragge. 2010. Contesting Community: The Limits and Potential of Local Organizing. London: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. 1980. Power and Powerlessness: Quiescence and Rebelion in an Appalachian Valley. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gecan, M. 2002. Going Public. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Geddes, M. 2006. “Partnership and the Limits to Local Governance in England: Institutionalist Analysis and Neoliberalism.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 30 (1): 76–97. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00645.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasman, M. 2010. “Society not State: The Challenge of the Big Society.” Public Policy Research 17 (2): 59–63. doi:10.1111/j.1744-540X.2010.00604.x.
   Google Scholar
• Goverde, H., P. G. Cerny, M. Haugaard, and H. Lentner. 2000. Power in Contemporary Politics: Theories, Practices, Globalizations. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Translated by T. McCarthy. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 2003. “New Labour’s Double-Shuffle.” Soundings 24: 10–25.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, D. 2005. A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, P. 2006. “From Recognition to Support: Community Development Workers in the United Kingdom.” Community Development Journal 41 (3): 277–292. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi063.
   Google Scholar
• Islington. 2011. Closing the gap: The final report of The Islington Fairness Commission, June, 2011. http://www.islington.gov.uk/fairness.
   Google Scholar
• Lawless, P., and S. Pearson. 2012. “Outcomes from Community Engagement in Urban Regeneration: Evidence from England’s New Deal for Communities Programme.” Planning Theory and Practice 13 (4): 509–527. doi:10.1080/14649357.2012.728003.
   Google Scholar
• Liverpool. 2012. Come Together: The report of the Liverpool Fairness Commission, May, 2012. http://liverpoolfairnesscommission.com/downloads/Fairness_Report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Manchester. 2013. Greater Manchester Poverty Commission: Recommendations Report, January, 2013. http://www.povertymanchester.org.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, P. 2010. “Mind the Gap? The Persistence of Pathological Discourses in Urban Regeneration Policy.” Housing, Theory and Society 27 (3): 221–240. doi:10.1080/14036090903326452.
   Google Scholar
• Morse, S., and N. McNamara. 2006. “Analysing Institutional Partnerships in Development: A Contract between Equals or a Loaded Process?” Progress in Development Studies 6 (4): 321–336. doi:10.1191/1464993406ps146oa.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2002. Politics and Passions: The Stakes of Democracy. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, M. 2002. “Social Partnership – Is It the Only Game in Town?” Community Development Journal 37 (1): 80–90. doi:10.1093/cdj/37.1.80.
   Google Scholar
• Newcastle. 2012. Fair share, Fair play, Fair go, Fair say: Report of the Newcastle Fairness Commission, July. http://www.ncl.ac.uk/socialrenewal/engagement/fairnesscommission/documents/fairnessreport.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, J., and J. Clarke. 2009. Publics, Politics and Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services. London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Sennett, R. 2011. Why Complexity Improves the Quality of City Life, Cities, Health and Well-Being, Urban Age: A Worldwide Investigation into the Future of Cities, Hong Kong, November. London: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. 2007. “Community Development and the Politics of Community.” Community Development Journal 43 (1): 24–36. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsl035.
   Google Scholar
• Somers, J., and S. Bradford. 2006. “Discourses of Partnership in Multi-agency Working in the Community and Voluntary Sectors in Ireland.” Irish Journal of Sociology 15 (2): 67–85.
   Google Scholar
• Tett, L. 2005. “Partnerships, Community Groups and Social Inclusion.” Studies in Continuing Education 27 (1): 1–15. doi:10.1080/01580370500056364.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. 2009. “The Living Wage.” Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture 42: 33–46. doi:10.3898/136266209789024933.
   Google Scholar
• Wills, J. 2013. “London’s Olympics in 2012: The good, the Bad and an Organising Opportunity.” Political Geography. doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2012.12.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• York. 2012. A better York for everyone – The York Fairness Commission: Findings and Recommendations, September, 2012. www.yorkfairnesscommission.org.uk.
   Google Scholar