Territorial changes and changing identities: how spatial identities are used in the up-scaling of local government in the Netherlands

References

• Alexander, D. 2013. “Crossing Boundaries: Action Networks, Amalgamation and Inter-Community Trust in a Small Rural Shire.” Local Government Studies 39 (4): 463–487. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.693074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2007. “Territory and identity in the age of globalization: the case of Western Europe.” PhD thesis, University of Colorado.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2010a. “Exploring the Correspondence between Regional Forms of Governance and Regional Identity: The Case of Western Europe.” European Urban and Regional Studies 17 (3): 261–276. doi:10.1177/0969776410365784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2010b. “Meanings of Place and Aspects of the Self: An Interdisciplinary and Empirical Account.” GeoJournal 75: 119–132. doi:10.1007/s10708-009-9290-9.
   Google Scholar
• Antonsich, M. 2011. “Grounding Theories of Place and Globalisation.” Tesg 102: 331–345.
   Google Scholar
• Aulich, C., G. Sansom, and P. McKinlay. 2014. “A Fresh Look at Municipal Consolidation in Australia.” Local Government Studies 40: 1–20. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.775124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldersheim, H., and L. E. Rose, eds. 2010. Territorial Choice: The Politics of Boundaries and Borders. New York: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Z. 2004. Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Beeckman, D., and R. van der Bie. 2005. “Een Eeuw Gemeentelijke Herindelingen.” Bevolkingstrends, Statistisch Kwartaalblad over De Demografie Van Nederland 53 (2): 63–64.
   Google Scholar
• Beenakker, J. 2008. 1000 Jaar Duin- En Bollenstreek. Zwolle: Waanders.
   Google Scholar
• Boudreau, J., and R. Keil. 2001. “Seceding from Responsibility? Secession Movements in Los Angeles.” Urban Studies 38: 1701–1731. doi:10.1080/00420980120084822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. J., and J. Deem. 2014. “A Tale of Two Regionalisms: Improving the Measurement of Regionalism in Australia and Beyond.” Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2014.980800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchhardt, S. 2015. Competition with Identity Driven Entry: A Principal Multi-Agent Model on the Success of Mergers and Acquisitions. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• BZK. 2013. Bestuur in Samenhang. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties.
   Google Scholar
• Casey, R. 2010. “Community, Difference and Identity: The Case of the Irish in Sheffield.” Irish Geography 43 (3): 211–232. doi:10.1080/00750778.2010.565680.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Castells, M. 2010. The Power of Identity. 2nd ed. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• De Ceuninck, K., H. Reynaert, K. Steyvers, and T. Valcke. 2010. “Municipal Amalgamations in the Low Countries.” Same Problems, Different Solutions, Local Government Studies 36: 803–822. doi:10.1080/03003930.2010.522082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Peuter, B., V. Pattyn, and E. Wayenberg. 2011. “Territorial Reform of Local Government.” Local Government Studies 37: 533–552. doi:10.1080/03003930.2011.604546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, J., and E. Evers. 2008. Bestuur En Ruimte: De Randstad in Internationaal Perspectief. Den Haag: Ruimtelijk Planbureau.
   Google Scholar
• Delanty, G., and C. Rumford. 2005. Rethinking Europe: Social Theory and the Implications of Europeanization. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J., M. A. Kortt, and B. Dollery. 2014. “Did the Big Stick Work? An Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program.” Local Government Studies. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.874341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drori, I., A. Wrzesniewski, and S. Ellis. 2013. “One Out of Many? Boundary Negotiation and Identity Formation in Postmerger Integration.” Organization Science 24: 1717–1741. doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duineveld, M. 2004. Bedankt Voor De Bloemen: Over Machtige Burgers Bloemen En Bakstenen. Rotterdam: Bureau Venhuizen.
   Google Scholar
• Duineveld, M., and K. van Assche. 2011. “The Power of Tulips: Constructing Nature and Heritage in a Contested Landscape.” Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 13 (2): 79–98. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2011.572655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fern, E. F. 2001. Advanced Focus Group Research. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fortin, A., and M. Bédard. 2003. “Citadins Et Banlieusards. Représentations, Pratiques Et Identités.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 12 (1): 124–142.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Katwijk. 2007. BSV Katwijk. Een Zee Aan Mogelijkheden. Brede Structuurvisie 2007–2020. Katwijk: Gemeente Katwijk.
   Google Scholar
• Giessner, S. R. 2011. “Is the Merger Necessary? The Interactive Effect of Perceived Necessity and Sense of Continuity on Post-Merger Identification.” Human Relations 64: 1079–1098. doi:10.1177/0018726711406979.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleibs, I. H., A. Mummendey, and P. Noack. 2008. “Predictors of Change in Postmerger Identification during A Merger Process: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 95: 1095–1112. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.5.1095.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanes, N. 2015. “Amalgamation Impacts on Local Public Expenditures in Sweden.” Local Government Studies 41: 63–77. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.869496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. 2013. “Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1111/scps.2013.36.issue-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulst, R., and A. van Montfort. 2007. Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Europe. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jeekel, P., D. O. D. Leth, M. Nijhout, and B. Snoeker. 2013. Een Onderzoek Naar Verzet Tegen Gemeentelijke Herindelingen. Utrecht: honours leeronderzoek SGPL.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, M., and G. MacLeod. 2004. “Regional Spaces, Spaces of Regionalism: Territory, Insurgent Politics and the English Question.” Transactions IBG 29: 433–452.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, R., and L. Desforges. 2003. “Localities and the Reproduction of Welsh Nationalism.” Political Geography 22: 271–292. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(02)00096-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamphuis, B. M., and C. M. Volkers, eds. 1995. Landschap En Toerisme in De Bollenstreek Onder Stedelijke Druk. Wageningen: LEI-DLO & SC-DLO.
   Google Scholar
• Kato, Y. 2011. “Coming of Age in the Bubble: Suburban Adolescents’ Use of a Spatial Metaphor as a Symbolic Boundary.” Symbolic Interaction 34: 244–264. doi:10.1525/si.2011.34.2.244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2000. “Governance Restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: Amalgamation or Secession?” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 24: 758–781. doi:10.1111/ijur.2000.24.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keil, R. 2002. “‘Common-Sense’ Neoliberalism: Progressive Conservative Urbanism in Toronto, Canada.” Antipode 34: 578–601. doi:10.1111/anti.2002.34.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer, U., and R. Klemmensen. 2015. “What are the Local Political Costs of Centrally Determined Reforms of Local Government?” Local Government Studies 41: 100–118. doi:10.1080/03003930.2014.887564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, R. C. 2001. “Clustering of Economic Activities in Polycentric Urban Regions: The Case of the Randstad.” Urban Studies 38: 717–732. doi:10.1080/00420980120035303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lightbody, J. 1999. “Canada’s Seraglio Cities: Political Barriers to Regional Governance.” Canadian Journal of Sociology 24 (2): 175–191. doi:10.2307/3341728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. 1983. Legitimation Durch Verfahren. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• McSweeny, B. 1999. Security, Identity and Interests. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mecking, S. 2012. Bürgerwille Und Gebietsreform: Demokratieentwicklung Und Neuordnung Von Staat Und Gesellschaft in Nordrhein-Westfalen 1965-2000. München: Oldenbourg Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Moreno, L. 2007. “Identités Duales Et Nations sans État (La Question Moreno).” Revue Internationale de Politique Comparee 14: 497–513. doi:10.3917/ripc.144.0497.
   Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 1991. “Deconstructing Regions: Notes on the Scales of Spatial Life.” Environment and Planning A 23: 239–256. doi:10.1068/a230239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2002. “Bounded Spaces in the Mobile World: Deconstructing ‘Regional Identity’.” Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie 93 (2): 137–148. doi:10.1111/tesg.2002.93.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2010. “Commentary: Regions are Social Constructs, but Who or What Constructs Them? Agency in Question.” Environment and Planning A 42: 2296–2301. doi:10.1068/a42232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasi, A. 2012. “Regional Planning and the Mobilization of ‘Regional Identity’: From Bounded Spaces to Relational Complexity.” Regional Studies 47: 1206–1219. doi:10.1080/00343404.2012.661410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rausch, A. S. 2012. “A Framework for Japan’s New Municipal Reality: Assessing the Heisei Gappei Mergers.” Japan Forum 24 (2): 185–204. doi:10.1080/09555803.2012.671845.
   Google Scholar
• Roundy, P. T. 2010. “Gaining Legitimacy by Telling Stories: The Power of Narratives in Ligitimizing Mergers and Acquisitions.” Journal of Organisational Culture, Communications and Conflict 14: 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Ruggiero, P., P. Monfardini, and R. Mussari. 2012. “Territorial Boundaries as Limits: A Foucauldian Analysis of the Agglomeration of Municipalities.” International Journal of Public Administration 35 (7): 492–506. doi:10.1080/01900692.2012.661171.
   Google Scholar
• Sack, R. 1997. Homo Geographicus. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Soguel, N., and J. Silberstein. 2015. “Welfare Loss with Municipal Amalgamations and the Willingness-to-Pay for the Municipality Name.” Local Government Studies 41: 977–996. doi:10.1080/03003930.2015.1061507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spicer, Z. 2012. “Post-amalgamation Politics.” Canadian Journal of Urban Research 21: 90–111.
   Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K. 2009. “Rescaling Regional Identities: Communicating Thick and Thin Regional Identities.” Studies in Ethnicity and Nationalism 9: 452–464. doi:10.1111/sena.2009.9.issue-3.
   Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K., and M. Hogenstijn. 2015. ‘Eerst Waren We Gewoon Wij En Nu Is Het Wij En Zij’: Gebruik Slijtage En Vernieuwing Van Regionale Identiteiten. Den Haag: Ministerie van Binnenlandse Zaken en Koninkrijksrelaties. http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/bestanden/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2015/05/01/onderzoeksrapport-over-lokale-en-regionale-identiteiten/eerst-waren-we-gewoon-wij-terlouw-hogenstijn-2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Terlouw, K., and B. Van Gorp. 2014. “Layering Spatial Identities: The Identity Discourses of New Regions.” Environment and Planning A 46: 852–866. doi:10.1068/a45689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomàs, M. 2012. “Exploring the Metropolitan Trap.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 36: 554–567. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2011.01066.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Assche, D. 2005. Lokale Politiek Als Katalysator Van Vertrouwen: Binnengemeentelijke Decentralisatie in Antwerpen. Brugge: Vanden Broele.
   Google Scholar
• van Knippenberg, D., B. van Knippenberg, L. Monden, and F. De Lima. 2002. “Organizational Identification after a Merger: A Social Identity Perspective.” British Journal of Social Psychology 41: 233–252. doi:10.1348/014466602760060228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VROM. 2007. Strategische Toekomstagenda Randstad 2040: Naar Een Duurzame En Concurrerende Europese Topregio. Den Haag: VROM.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., and A. Paasi. 2013. “When Old and New Regionalism Collide: Deinstitutionalization of Regions and Resistance Identity in Municipality Amalgamations.” Journal of Rural Studies 30: 31–40. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2012.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerbauer, K., T. Suutari, and A. Saartenoja. 2012. “Resistance to the Deinstitutionalization of a Region: Borders, Identity and Activism in a Municipality Merger.” Geoforum 43 (6): 1065–1075. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.06.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar