Inter-municipal cooperation, economies of scale and cost efficiency: an application of stochastic frontier analysis to Dutch municipal tax departments

References

• Aigner, D., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Schmidt. 1977. “Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Frontier Production Function Models.” Journal of Econometrics 6 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(77)90052-5.
   Google Scholar
• Allers, M. A., and J. B. Geertsema. 2016. “The Effects of Local Government Amalgamation on Public Spending, Taxation, and Service Levels: Evidence from 15 Years of Municipal Consolidation.” Journal of Regional Science 56 (4): 659–682. doi:10.1111/jors.12268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvarez, A., C. Amsler, L. Orea, and P. Schmidt. 2006. “Interpreting and Testing the Scaling Property in Models Where Inefficiency Depends on Firm Characteristics.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 25 (3): 201–212. doi:10.1007/s11123-006-7639-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and G. Boyne. 2011. “Corporate Capacity and Public Service Performance.” Public Administration 89: 894–908. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01891.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, R., and G. A. Boyne. 2009. “Size, Structure and Administrative Overheads: An Empirical Analysis of English Local Authorities.” Urban Studies 46 (4): 739–759. doi:10.1177/0042098009102127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and A. Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain.” The Journal of Policy Reform 9 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13841280500513084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. Mur. 2009. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Privatization and Waste Management Costs: Evidence from Rural Municipalities.” Waste Management 29 (10): 2772–2778. Journal Article. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. E. Warner. 2015. “Inter-Municipal Cooperation and Costs: Expectations and Evidence.” Public Administration 93 (1): 52–67. doi:10.1111/padm.12104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2014. “Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs? Evidence from Residential Solid Waste Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (1): 85–107. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bikker, J., and D. van der Linde. 2016. “Scale Economies in Local Public Administration.” Local Government Studies 42 (3): 441–463. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1146139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bish, R. L., and V. Ostrom. 1973. Understanding Urban Government: Metropolitan Reform Reconsidered. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. 1996. “Competition and Local Government: A Public Choice Perspective.” Urban Studies 33: 703–721. doi:10.1080/00420989650011799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T., and M. Potoski. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. doi:10.1093/jopart/mug030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J., and B. Dollery. 2002. “Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australian Local Government? A Review of the Research Evidence.” Urban Policy and Research 20 (4): 391–414. doi:10.1080/0811114022000032618.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. Gradus. 2014. “Handbook on Waste Management.” In Waste Management in the Netherlands, edited by T. Kinnaman and K. Takeuchi, 287–315. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2013. “Cost Advantage Cooperations Larger than Private Waste Collectors.” Applied Economics Letters 20 (7): 702–705. doi:10.1080/13504851.2012.732682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., and A. Johnson. 2005. “Enhancing Efficiency in Australian Local Government: An Evaluation of Alternative Models of Municipal Governance.” Urban Policy and Research 23 (1): 73–85. doi:10.1080/0811114042000335278.
   Google Scholar
• Drew, J., M. A. Kortt, and B. Dollery. 2016. “Did the Big Stick Work? an Empirical Assessment of Scale Economies and the Queensland Forced Amalgamation Program.” Local Government Studies 42 (1): 1–14. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.874341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. 2007. “Rational Choice and Regional Governance.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29: 47–63. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00322.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, W. F., and T. Gurley-Calvez. 2006. Will Consolidation Improve Sub-National Governments? (Policy Research Working Paper No. 3913). Washtingon, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Garrone, P., L. Grilli, and X. Rousseau. 2013. “Management Discretion and Political Interference in Municipal Enterprises. Evidence from Italian Utilities.” Local Government Studies 39 (4): 514–540. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.726198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geys, B., F. Heinemann, and A. Kalb (2007). “Local Governments in the Wake of Demographic Change: Efficiency and Economies of Scale in German Municipalities.” ZEW-Centre for European. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=997220
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M. and J. C. Fry. 2011. Shared Services and Municipal Consolidation: A Critical Analysis. Alexandria, VA: Public Technology Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Lago-Peñas, S., and J. Martinez-Vazquez, eds.. 2013. The Challenge of Local Government Size: Theoretical Perspectives, International Experience, and Policy Reform. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Meeusen, W., and J. Van den Broeck. 1977. “Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error.” International Economic Review 18 (2): 435–444. doi:10.2307/2525757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, R. B., and R. J. Oakerson. 1993. “Comparative Metropolitan Organization: Service Production and Governance Structures in St. Louis (MO) and Allegheny County (PA).” Publius 23 (1): 19–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parmeter, C., and S. Kumbhakar. 2014. “Efficiency Analysis: A Primer On Recent Advances.” Foundations and trends in Econometrics 7: 191-385.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Lopez, G., D. Prior, and J. L. Zafra-Gómez. 2015. “Rethinking New Public Management Delivery Forms and Efficiency: Long-Term Effects in Spanish Local Government.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25 (4): 1157–1183. doi:10.1093/jopart/muu088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-López, G., D. Prior, J. L. Zafra-Gómez, and A. M. Plata-Díaz. 2016. “Cost Efficiency in Municipal Solid Waste Service Delivery. Alternative Management Forms in Relation to Local Population Size.” European Journal of Operational Research 255: 583–592. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2016.05.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plata-Díaz, A. M., J. L. Zafra-Gómez, G. Pérez-López, and A. M. López-Hernández. 2014. “Alternative Management Structures for Municipal Waste Collection Services: The Influence of Economic and Political Factors.” Waste Management 34 (11): 1967–1976. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2014.07.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, P. 2011. “One-step And Two-step Estimation In Sfa Models.” Journal Of Productivity Analysis 36 (2): 201–203. doi:10.1007/s11123-011-0228-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simar, L., C. A. K. Lovell, and P. Vanden Eeckaut. 1994. Stochastic Frontiers Incorporating Exogenous Influences on Efficiency (Discussion Paper No. 9403). Louvain: Institut de Statistique, Université Catholique de Louvain.
   Google Scholar
• Solé-Ollé, A., and N. Bosch. 2005. “On the Relationship between Authority Size and the Costs of Providing Local Services: Lessons for the Design of Intergovernmental Transfers in Spain.” Public Finance Review 33 (3). doi:10.1177/1091142104272708.
   Google Scholar
• Sørensen, R. J. 2008. “Does Public Ownership Impair Efficiency in Norwegian Refuse Collection?” Public Administration 85 (4): 67–81. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-8711-0_5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, H.-J., and P. Schmidt. 2002. “One-Step and Two-Step Estimation of the Effects of Exogenous Variables on Technical Efficiency Levels.” Journal of Productivity Analysis 18 (2): 129–144. doi:10.1023/A:1016565719882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M., and A. Hefetz. 2003. “Rural - Urban Differences in Privatization: Limits to the Competitive State.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 (5): 703–718. doi:10.1068/c008r.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. 2006. “Market-Based Governance and the Challenge for Rural Governments: US Trends.” Social Policy and Administration 40 (6): 612–631. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00523.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafra-Gómez, J. L., D. Prior, A. M. P. Díaz, and A. M. López-Hernández. 2013. “Reducing Costs in Times of Crisis: Delivery Forms in Small and Medium Sized Local Governments’ Waste Management Services.” Public Administration 91 (1): 51–68. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02012.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zullo, R. 2009. “Does Fiscal Stress Induce Privatization? Correlates of Private and Intermunicipal Contracting, 1992-2002.” Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions 22 (3): 459–481. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01447.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar