The relationship between competition and efficiency of waste-collection services in the Czech Republic

References

• Antonioli, B., and M. Filippini. 2002. “Optimal Size in the Waste Collection Sector.” Review of Industrial Organization 20 (3): 239–252. doi:10.1023/A:1015043524679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asplund, M., and R. Sandin. 1999. “The Number of Firms and Production Capacity in Relation to Market Size.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 47 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1111/1467-6451.00090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee, A. V., and E. Duflo. 2000. “Reputation Effects and the Limits of Contracting: A Study of the Indian Software Industry.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 115 (3): 989–1017. doi:10.1162/003355300554962.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, H. G., and J. Cantner. 2004. Liberalisierung der siedlungsabfallwirtschaft: Eine analyse theoriebasierter sowie praxisbezogener liberalisierungskonzeptionen. Augsburg: BIfA.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and A. Costas. 2006. “Do Public Sector Reforms Get Rusty? Local Privatization in Spain.” The Journal of Policy Reform 9 (1): 1–24. doi:10.1080/13841280500513084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2006. “Between Privatization and Intermunicipal Cooperation: Small Municipalities, Scale Economies and Transaction Costs.” Urban Public Economics Review 6: 13–31. Accessed March 30 2017. http://www.ub.edu/graap/UPER6_artBel.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2008. “Privatization and Competition in the Delivery of Local Services: An Empirical Examination of the Dual Market Hypothesis.” Document de Treball, XREAP2008-4. Accessed March 30 2017. http://www.xreap.cat/RePEc/xrp/pdf/XREAP2008-4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2010. “Empirical Analysis of Solid Management Waste Costs: Some Evidence from Galicia, Spain.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 54 (3): 187–193. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.07.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and X. Fageda. 2011. “Big Guys Eat Big Cakes: Firm Size and Contracting in Urban and Rural Areas.” International Public Management Journal 14 (1): 4–26. doi:10.1080/10967494.2011.547746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2013. “Why Do Municipalities Cooperate to Provide Local Public Services? an Empirical Analysis.” Local Government Studies 39 (3): 435–454. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.781024.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and M. Mur. 2014. “Does Cooperation Reduce Service Delivery Costs? Evdence from Residential Solid Waste Services.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24 (1): 85–107. doi:10.1093/jopart/mus059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., X. Fageda, and W. E. Warner. 2010. “Is Private Production of Public Services Cheaper than Public Production? A Meta‐Regression Analysis of Solid Waste and Water Services.” Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 29 (3): 553–577. doi:10.1002/pam.20509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and A. Miralles. 2003. “Factors Influencing Privatization of Urban Solid Waste Collection: Some Evidence from Spain.” Urban Studies 40 (7): 1323–1334. doi:10.1080/0042098032000084622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. Mur. 2009. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Privatization and Waste Management Costs: Evidence from Rural Municipalities.” Waste Management 29 (10): 2772–2778. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2009.06.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bel, G., and M. Warner. 2008. “Competition or Monopoly? Comparing US and Spanish Privatization.” Public Administration: An International Quarterly 86 (3): 723–736. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00700.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggar, D. R. 2000. “Competition in Local Services: Solid Waste Management.” In OECD Competition Law and Policy Working Paper No. 28.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2003. “Transaction Costs and Institutional Explanations for Government Service Production Decisions.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (4): 441–468. doi:10.1093/jpart/mug030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. L., and M. Potoski. 2005. “Transaction Costs and Contracting: The Practitioner Perspective.” Public Performance & Management Review 28 (3): 326–351. doi:10.1080/15309576.2005.11051842.
   Google Scholar
• Czech Statistical Office. 2017. “Number of Inhabitants in Municipalities [Počet obyvatel v obcích].” Accessed October 23 2017. https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/pocet-obyvatel-v-obcich-k-112017
   Google Scholar
• Da Cruz, N., P. Simões, and R. Marques. 2013. “The Hurdles of Local Governments with PPP Contracts in the Waste Sector.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 31 (2): 292–307. doi:10.1068/c11158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Feo, G., and C. Malvano. 2012. “Technical, Economic and Environmental Analysis of a MSW Kerbside Separate Collection System Applied to Small Communities.” Waste Management 32 (10): 1760–1774. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2003. “Cost Savings of Contracting Out Refuse Collection.” Empirica 30 (2): 149–161. doi:10.1023/A:1024175730230.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2007. “Collusion in the Dutch Waste Collection Market.” Local Government Studies 33 (4): 573–588. doi:10.1080/03003930701417601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2008. “Institutional Developments in the Dutch Waste Collection Market.” Government and Policy 26 (1): 110–126. doi:10.1068/c0636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkgraaf, E., and R. H. J. M. Gradus. 2011. “Efficiency Effects of Privatizing Refuse Collection: Be Careful and Alternatives Present.” Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper. TI 2011-156/3. Accessed November 25 2016. https://papers.tinbergen.nl/11156.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dubin, J. A., and P. Navarro. 1988. “How Markets for Impure Public Goods Organize: The Case of Household Refuse Collection.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 4 (2): 217–241. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a036951.
   Google Scholar
• Folz, D. H. 2004. “Service Quality and Benchmarking the Performance of Municipal Services.” Public Administration Review 64 (2): 209–220. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00362.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederiszick, H. W., S. Reinhold, and J. Demuth. 2016. “Rekommunalisierung und wettbewerb in der entsorgungswirtschaft: Trends, erklärungen und wettbewerbspolitische implikationen.” ESMT White Paper No. WP-16-01. Accessed March 30 2017 http://static.esmt.org/publications/whitepapers/WP-16-01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gómez-Lobo, A., and S. Szymanski. 2001. “A Law of Large Numbers: Bidding and Compulsory Competitive Tendering for Refuse Collection Contracts.” Review of Industrial Organization 18 (1): 105–113. doi:10.1023/A:1026545306923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gugler, K., M. Weichselbaumer, and C. Zulehner. 2015. “Competition in the Economic Crisis: Analysis of Procurement Auctions.” European Economic Review 73: 35–57. doi:10.1016/j.euroecorev.2014.10.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimarães, B., P. Simões, and R. C. Marques. 2010. “Does Performance Evaluation Help Public Managers? A Balanced Scorecard Approach in Urban Waste Services.” Journal of Environmental Management 91 (12): 2632–2638. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.07.039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hefetz, A., and M. Warner. 2004. “Privatization and Its Reverse: Explaining the Dynamics of the Government Contracting Process.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (2): 171–190. doi:10.1093/jopart/muh012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iimi, A. 2006. “Auction Reforms for Effective Official Development Assistance.” Review of Industrial Organization 28 (2): 109–128. doi:10.1007/s11151-006-0012-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobsen, R., J. Buysse, and X. Gellynck. 2013. “Cost Comparison between Private and Public Collection of Residual Household Waste: Multiple Case Studies in the Flemish Region of Belgium.” Waste Management 33 (1): 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.08.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, Y. 2017. “Incentive and Sampling Effects in Procurement Auctions with Endogenous Number of Bidders.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 52: 393–426. doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2017.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlman, J. M., and S. R. Johnson. 1983. “The Number of Competitors and Bid Prices.” Southern Economic Journal 50 (1): 213–220. doi:10.2307/1058052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. D. 2016. “Adam Smith on Markets, Competition and Violations of Natural Liberty.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 40 (2): 615–638. doi:10.1093/cje/bev011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavee, D., and M. Khatib. 2010. “Benchmarking in Municipal Solid Waste Recycling.” Waste Management 30 (11): 2204–2208. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2010.03.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T., and X. Zheng. 2006. “Entry and Competition Effects in First-Price Auctions: Theory and Evidence from Procurement Auctions.” Centre for Microdata Methods and Practice, Institute for Fiscal Studies, 69. Accessed August 24 2009 http://www.cemmap.ac.uk/wps/cwp1306.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lindqvist, E. 2007. “Will Privatization Reduce Costs?” SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance No. 660. Accessed March 30 2017. http://swopec.hhs.se/hastef/papers/hastef0660.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lopez-de-Silane, F., A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny. 1997. “Privatization in the United States.” Rand Journal of Economics 28 (3): 447–471. doi:10.3386/w5113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, R. C., and P. Simões. 2008. “Does the Sunshine Regulatory Approach Work? Governance and Regulation Model of the Urban Waste Services in Portugal.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 52 (8–9): 1040–1049. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.04.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massarutto, A. 2007. “Municipal Waste Management as a Local Utility: Options for Competition in an Environmentally-Regulated Industry.” Utilities Policy 15 (1): 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.jup.2006.09.003.
   Google Scholar
• Onur, I., R. Ozcan, and B. K. Taş Onur. 2011. “Public Procurement Auctions and Competition in Turkey.” Review of Industrial Organization 40 (3): 207–223. doi:10.1007/s11151-011-9299-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panzar, J. C., and R. D. Willig. 1981. “Economies of Scope.” The American Economic Review 71 (2): 268–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shleifer, A. 1998. “State versus Private Ownership.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 12 (4): 133–150. doi:10.1257/jep.12.4.133.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, P., P. Carvalho, and R. C. Marques. 2012b. “Performance Assessment of Refuse Collection Services Using Robust Efficiency Measures.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 67: 56–66. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.07.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, P., P. Carvalho, and R. C. Marques. 2013. “The Market Structure of Urban Solid Waste Services: How Different Models Lead to Different Results.” Local Government Studies 39 (3): 396–413. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.783477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, P., N. F. Cruz, and R. C. Marques. 2012a. “The Performance of Private Partners in the Waste Sector.” Journal of Cleaner Production 29–30: 214–221. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.01.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, P., and R. C. Marques. 2011. “How Does the Operational Environment Affect Utility Performance? A Parametric Study on the Waste Sector.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 55 (7): 695–702. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, P., and R. C. Marques. 2012a. “Influence of Regulation on the Productivity of Waste Utilities. What Can We Learn with the Portuguese Experience?” Waste Management 32 (6): 1266–1275. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.02.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, P., and R. C. Marques. 2012b. “On the Economic Performance of the Waste Sector. A Literature Review.” Journal of Environmental Management 106: 40–47. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.04.005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukopová, J., and D. Klimovský. 2016. “Intermunicipal Cooperation and Local Cost Efficiency: The Case of Waste Management Services in the Czech Republic.” In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Current Trends in Public Sector Research 2016, edited by D. Špalková and L. Matějová, 398–405. Brno: Masaryk University.
   Google Scholar
• Soukopová, J., I. Malý, and V. Ficek. 2013. “Does the Competitive Environment Influence the Municipal Expenditures on Municipak Waste Management in the Czech Republic? [Má konkurenční prostředí vliv na výdaje obcí na nakládání s komunálním odpadem v ČR?].” Waste Forum 2013 (4): 231–239.
   Google Scholar
• Soukopová, J., J. Nemec, L. Matějová, and M. Struk. 2014. “Municipality Size and Local Public Services: Do Economies of Scale Exist?” NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy 7 (2): 30–43. doi:10.2478/nispa-2014-0007.
   Google Scholar
• Soukopová, J., F. Ochrana, D. Klimovský, and B. M. Mericková. 2016. “Factors Influencing the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Municipal Waste Management Expenditure.” Lex Localis 14 (3): 359–378. doi:10.4335/14.3.358-378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soukopová, J., and G. Vaceková. 2015. “Competition and Municipal Waste Management Expenditure: Evidence from the Czech Republic, Olomouc Region.” Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubice. Series D, Faculty of Economics & Administration 22 (35): 128–138.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M., and A. Hefetz. 2003. “Rural - Urban Differences in Privatization: Limits to the Competitive State.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 21 (5): 703–718. doi:10.1068/c008r.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M. E. 2006. “Market-Based Governance and the Challenge for Rural Governments: US Trends.” Social Policy & Administration 40 (6): 612–631. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9515.2006.00523.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson, O. E. 1981. “The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach.” American Journal of Sociology 87 (3): 548–577. doi:10.1086/227496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wooldridge, J. M. 2009. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Cincinnati: South-Western College Publishing.
   Google Scholar