An empirical assessment of local autonomy and special district finance in the US

References

• Amiel, L., S. Deller, and J. Stallman. 2009. “The Construction of a Tax and Expenditure Limitation Index for the U.S.” Working paper.University of Wisconsin, Agricultural and Applied Economics
   Google Scholar
• Benton, J. E. 2002. “County Service Delivery: Does Government Structure Matter?” Public Administration Review 62 (4): 471–479. doi:10.1111/puar.2002.62.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, C. R. 2009. Imperfect Union: Representation and Taxation in Multilevel Government. New York: Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., E. J. Ringquist, R. C. Fording, and R. L. Hanson. 1998. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93.” American Journal of Political Science 42: 327–348. doi:10.2307/2991759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, W. D., R. C. Fording, E. J. Ringquist, R. L. Hanson, and C. Klarner. 2010. “Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in The American States: A Re-appraisal.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10: 117-135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billings, S. B., and D. A. Carroll. 2012. “Debrucing the Link between Tax and Expenditure Limits and Special District Governments.” Growth and Change 43 (2): 273–303. doi:10.1111/grow.2012.43.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollens, J. C. 1986. “Examining the Link between State Policy and the Creation of Local Special District.” State & Local Government Review 18 (3): 117–124.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, N. 1994. Formation of American Local Governments: Private Values in Public Institutions. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B. 2006. “Local Government Autonomy and State Reliance on Special District Governments: A Reassessment.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (3): 481–492. doi:10.1177/106591290605900315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., and J. Farmer. 2011. “Contingent Effects of Municipal and County TELs on Special District Usage in the United States.” Publius: the Journal of Federalism 41 (4): 709–733. doi:10.1093/publius/pjr031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, D. A. 2009. “Diversifying Municipal Government Revenue Structures: Fiscal Illusion or Instability?” Public Budgeting & Finance 29 (1): 27–48. doi:10.1111/pbaf.2009.29.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, 2012 Census of Governments. “Individual State Descriptions: 2012.” U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Connolly, K. D., D. Brunori, and M. E. Bell. 2010. “Are State and Local Finances Becoming More or Less Centralized, and Should We Care?” In The Property Tax and Local Autonomy, edited by M. E. Bell, D. Brunori, and Y. Youngman, 121–160. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Dagney., F., and K. Larita. 2016. “Special Districts and Local Government Debt: An Analysis of Old ‘North West Territory’ States.” Public Budgeting & Finance 37 (1): 112–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer, J. L. 2010. “Factors Influencing Special Purpose Service Delivery Among Counties.” Public Performance & Management Review 33 (4): 535–554. doi:10.2753/PMR1530-9576330401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farnham, P. G. 1985. “Re-Examining Local Debt Limits: A Disaggregated Analysis.” Southern Economic Journal 51 (4): 1186–1201. doi:10.2307/1058388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feiock, R. C., and J. B. Carr. 2001. “Incentives, Entrepreneurs and Boundary Changes: A Collective Action Framework.” Urban Affairs Review 36 (3): 382–405. doi:10.1177/10780870122184902.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, K. A. 1997. Political Economy of Special-Purpose Government. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodman, C. B. 2018. “Usage of Specialized Service Delivery: Evidence from Contiguous Counties.” Publius: the Journal of Federalism. Online first. doi:10.1093/publius/pjx065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramlich, E. M. 1977. “Intergovernmental Grants, A Review of the Empirical Literature.” In The Political Economy of Fiscal Federalism, edited by W. Oates. Lexington, MA: D.C. Health.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R. 2002. “Revenue Diversification: Fiscal Illusion or Flexible Financial Management.” Public Budgeting & Finance 22 (4): 52–72. doi:10.1111/1540-5850.00089.
   Google Scholar
• Hendrick, R. M., and J. Crawford. 2014. “Municipal Fiscal Policy Space and Fiscal Structure: Tools for Managing Spending Volatility.” Public Budgeting & Finance 34 (3): 24-50.
   Google Scholar
• Hoechle, D. 2007. “Robust Standard Errors for Panel Regressions with Cross-Sectional Dependence.” Stata Journal 7 (3): 281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyos, R. D., and S. Vasilis. 2006. “Testing for Cross-Sectional Dependence in Panel-data Models.” Stata Journal 6 (4): 482–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiewiet, D. R., and K. Szakaly. 1996. “Constitutional Limitations on Borrowing: An Analysis of State Bonded Indebtedness.” The Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 12 (1): 62–97. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.jleo.a023362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioko, S. 2010. “The Impact of Property Tax Limits on Local Government Borrowing.” Paper presented at the States as Facilitators or Obstructionists of Local Government Conference, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, February 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Krane, D., P. N. Rigos, and Melvin B, Hill, Jr. (eds.). 2001. Home Rule in America: A Fifty State Handbook. Washington, DC: CQ press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, P. G. 2000. “The Durability of Local Government Structure: Evidence from California.” State and Local Government Review 32 (1): 34–48. doi:10.1177/0160323X0003200103.
   Google Scholar
• MacManus, S. A. 1981. “Special District Governments: A Note on Their Use as Property Tax Relief Mechanisms in the 1970s.” The Journal of Politics 43: 1207–1214. doi:10.2307/2130196.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe Barbara, C. 2000. “Special-District Formation among the States.” State and Local Government Review 32 (2): 121–131. doi:10.1177/0160323X0003200204.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 1972. Fisal Federalism. 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. 1985. “Searching for Leviathan: An Empirical Study.” The American Economic Review 75 (4): 748–757.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, R. M. 2007. “Local Government Fund Balances: How Much is Enough?” South Carolina Forum 1: 40–46.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, M. A., and C.W. Hoene. 2010. “State and the Fiscal Policy Space of Cities .” In The Property Tax and Local Autonomy, edited by M. Bell, D. Brunori, and J. Youngman, 243-284. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. C. B., and S. Donggyu 2003. “Dynamic Panel Estimation and Homogeneity Testing under Cross Section Dependence.” The Econometrics Journal 6 (1): 217–259.
   Google Scholar
• Sarafidis, V., T. Yamagata, and D. Robertson. 2009. “A Test of Cross Section Dependence for a Linear Dynamic Panel Model with Regressors.” Journal of Econometrics 148 (2): 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D., and S. Porca. 2005. “State-Local Revenue Diversification, Stability and Growth: Time Series Evidence.” The Review of Regional Studies 35 (3): 246–265.
   Google Scholar
• Shaun., B., and T. Donovan. 2004. “Evolution in State Governance Structures: Unintended Consequences of State Tax and Expenditure Limitations.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 189–196.
   Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. 2017. “The Rise of Specialized Governance in American Federalism: Testing Links between Local Government Autonomy and Formation of Special District Governments.” Publius: the Journal of Federalism 47 (1): 99–130. doi:10.1093/publius/pjw025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, Y. 2018. “Faulty Fiscal Illusion: Examining the Relationship between Revenue Diversification and Tax Burden in Major U.S. Cities across the Economic Cycle.” Local Government Studies: 1–20. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1433662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetzer, D. F. 1975. Special Districts in Cook County: Toward a Geography of Local Government. Chicago: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” Journal of Political Economy 64 (5): 416–424. doi:10.1086/257839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1993a. The Problem of Special Districts in American Government. Washington, DC: ACIR.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations. 1993b. State Laws Governing Local Government Structure and Administration. Washington, DC: ACIR.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H. 2008. “Comparing Local Government Systems across Countries: Conceptual and Methodological Challenges to Building a Field of Comparative Local Government Studies.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 26: 87–103. doi:10.1068/cav5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolman, H., and R. McManmon. 2010. “Comparing Local Government Autonomy across States.” In The Property Tax and Local Autonomy, edited by M. E. Bell, D. Brunori, and Y. Youngman, 69–113. Cambridge: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Wolman, H. 1990. “Decentralization: What It Is and Why We Should Care.” In Decentralization, Local Governments, and Markets, edited by R. J. Bennett. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yan, W. 2012. “The Impact of Revenue Diversification and Economic Base on State Revenue Stability.” Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 24 (1): 58–81. doi:10.1108/JPBAFM-24-01-2012-B003.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, P. 2017. “The Unintended Impact of Tax and Expenditure Limitations on the Use of Special Districts: The Politics of Circumvention.” Economics of Governance 19 (1): 21–50. doi:10.1007/s10101-017-0198-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar