Merging county administrations – cross-national evidence of fiscal and political effects

References

• Abadie, A., A. Diamond, and J. Hainmueller. 2015. “Comparative Politics and the Synthetic Control Method.” American Journal of Political Science 59: 495–510. doi:10.1111/ajps.12116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, M., and B. Geertsema. 2016. “The Effects of Local Government Amalgamation on Public Spending, Taxation, and Service Levels: Evidence from 15 Years of Municipal Consolidation.” Journal of Regional Science 56: 659–682. doi:10.1111/jors.2016.56.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, M., and B. Van Ommeren. 2016. “Intermunicipal Cooperation, Municipal Amalgamation and the Price of Credit.” Local Government Studies 42: 717–738. doi:10.1080/03003930.2016.1171754.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, R., and E. Slack. (2013). “Merging Municipalities: Is Bigger Better?” IMFG Papers, No. 14, Toronto: University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Blesse, S., and T. Baskaran. 2016. “Do Municipal Mergers Reduce Costs? Evidence from a German Federal State.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 59: 54–74. doi:10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2016.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blesse, S., and F. Roesel. 2017. Was Bringen Kommunale Gebietsreformen? Kausale Evidenz Zu Hoffnungen, Risiken Und Alternativen Instrumenten. Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik 18: 307–324. doi:10.1515/pwp-2017-0050.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, S. Serritzlew, and D. Treisman. 2016. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation.” American Political Science Review 110: 812–831. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blume, L., and T. Blume. 2007. “The Economic Effects of Local Authority Mergers: Empirical Evidence for German City Regions.” Annals of Regional Science 41: 689–713. doi:10.1007/s00168-007-0118-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brasington, D. 1999. “Joint Provision of Public Goods: The Consolidation of School Districts.” Journal of Public Economics 73: 373–393. doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00018-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-Analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42: 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. Mouritzen, and L. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Duncombe, W., and J. Yinger. 2007. “Does School District Consolidation Cut Costs?” Education Finance and Policy 2: 341–375. doi:10.1162/edfp.2007.2.4.341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, B. 2016. The Political Economy of Amalgamation – Evidence from a German State. Walter Eucken Institut. Freiburg: University of Freiburg.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz, B., and L. Feld. (2015). “The Political Economy of Municipal Amalgamation – Evidence of Common Pool Effects and Local Public Debt” CESifo Working Paper, No. 5676, Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Hanes, N. 2015. “Amalgamation Impacts on Local Public Expenditures in Sweden.” Local Government Studies 41: 63–77. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.869496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. 2015. “The Democratic Costs of Size: How Increasing Size Affects Citizen Satisfaction with Local Government.” Political Studies 63: 373–389. doi:10.1111/1467-9248.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harjunen, O., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. (2017). Political Representation and Effects of Municipal Mergers, VATT Working Papers 98, Helsinki.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, F. 1973. “Anlage, Stand Und Ziel Der Kommunalen Gebietsreform in Rheinland-Pfalz.” Berichte Zur Deutschen Landeskunde 47: 71–96.
   Google Scholar
• Holzer, M., J. Fry, E. Charbonneau, G. Von Ryzin, T. Wang, and E. Burnash. (2009). Literature Review and Analysis Related to Optimal Municipal Size and Efficiency, Report for the Local Unit Alignment, Reorganization, and Consolidation Commission. Newark: Rutgers University, School of Public Affairs and Administration (SPAA).
   Google Scholar
• Huber, P. J. (1967). “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Nonstandard Conditions.” Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1: 221–233.
   Google Scholar
• Knight, B., and N. Gordon. 2008. “The Effects of School District Consolidation on Educational Cost and Quality.” Public Finance Review 36: 408–430. doi:10.1177/1091142107305219.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, P., and P. Rochat. 2017. “The Effects of Local Government Consolidation on Turnout: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 23: 215–230. doi:10.1111/spsr.2017.23.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011a. “Size and Equal Opportunity in the Democratic Process: The Effect of the Danish Local Government Reform on Inequality in Internal Political Efficacy.” World Political Science Review 7: 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Lassen, D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011b. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105: 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lüchinger, S., and A. Stutzer. 2002. “Skalenerträge in Der Öffentlichen Kernverwaltung: Eine Empirische Analyse Anhand Von Gemeindefusionen.” Swiss Political Science Review 8: 27–50. doi:10.1002/j.1662-6370.2002.tb00333.x.
   Google Scholar
• Moisio, A., and R. Uusitalo. 2013. “The Impact of Municipality Mergers on Local Public Expenditures in Finland.” Public Finance and Management 13: 148–166.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Reingewertz, Y. 2012. “Do Municipal Amalgamations Work? Evidence from Municipalities in Israel.” Journal of Urban Economics 72: 240–251. doi:10.1016/j.jue.2012.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roesel, F. 2016. “Die Politischen Kosten Von Gebietsreformen.” Ifo Dresden Berichtet 23 (1): 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Roesel, F. 2017. “Do Mergers of Large Local Governments Reduce Expenditures? Evidence from Germany Using the Synthetic Control Method.” European Journal of Political Economy 50: 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2017.10.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandsør, A., T. Falch, and B. Strøm. 2017. Local Government Mergers and School Quality. mimeo. Oslo: University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Simon Lapointe, Tuukka Saarimaa & Janne Tukiainen (2018), Effects of municipal mergers on voter turnout. Local Government Studies 44 (04): 512–530. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2018.1465936
   Google Scholar
• Studerus, J. 2016. Fiscal Effects of Voluntary Municipal Mergers in Switzerland. St. Gallen: Institute of Public Finance and Fiscal Law of the University of St. Gallen, mimeo.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P., and J. Łukomska. 2017. “Is Small Beautiful? the Quasi-Experimental Analysis of the Impact of Territorial Fragmentation on Costs in Polish Local Governments.” Urban Affairs Review forthcoming. doi:10.1177/1078087417744676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, W., and G. Hewings. 2017. “Do City–County Mergers in China Promote Local Economic Development?” Economics of Transition 25: 439–469. doi:10.1111/ecot.2017.25.issue-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, D. (2008). “Decentralization Dataset.” http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/treisman/
   Google Scholar
• Van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies 43: 408–428. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. 1980. “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and A Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity.” Econometrica 48: 817–838. doi:10.2307/1912934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar