Who votes for mayor? Evidence from midsized American cities

References

• Aldag, A. M., and M. Warner. 2018. “Cooperation, Not Cost Savings: Explaining Duration of Shared Service Agreements.” Local Government Studies 44 (3): 350–370. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1411810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldag, A. M., M. Warner, and Y. Kim. 2018. “Leviathan or Public Steward? Evidence from Local Government Taxing Behavior in New York.” Publius the Journal of Federalism. doi:10.1093/publius/pjy035.
   Google Scholar
• Alford, R. R., and E. C. Lee. 1968. “Voting Turnout in American Cities.” The American Political Science Review 62 (3): 796–813. doi:10.2307/1953431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banfield, E. C., and J. Q. Wilson. 1963. City Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C. R., and J. E. Gersen. 2010. “The Timing of Election.” The University of Chicago Law Review 37: 37–64.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, C. R., and W. G. Howell. 2007. “Accountability and Local Elections: Rethinking Retrospective Voting.” Journal of Politics 69 (3): 844–858. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00579.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., and T. Donovan. 2016. “A Partisan Model of Electoral Reform: Voter Identification Laws and Confidence in State Elections.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 16 (3): 340–361. doi:10.1177/1532440015624102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretzer, Y. N., B. Persson, and T. B. Randup. 2016. “Is Public Procurement Efficiency Conditioned by Market Types? A Critical Test in Park and Road Sectors in Sweden.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (5): 448–501. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-02-2016-0039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, C. S., III. 1990. “Turnout in Municipal Elections.” Policy Studies Review 9 (3): 529–549. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1990.tb01061.x.
   Google Scholar
• Burnett, C. M., and V. Kogan. 2017. “The Politics of Potholes: Service Quality and Retrospective Voting in Local Elections.” The Journal of Politics 79 (1): 302–314. doi:10.1086/688736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caren, N. 2007. “Big City, Big Turnout? Electoral Participation in American Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00321.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chesters, G. 2009. “Social Movements and Regeneration: Within, Without, Against?” Local Government Studies 35 (3): 371–384. doi:10.1080/03003930902854297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copus, C., A. Iglesias, M. Hacek, M. Illner, and A. Lidstrom. 2016. “Have Mayors Will Travel: Trends and Developments in the Direct Election of the Mayor: A Five-Nation Study.” In (Ch.16) Local Public Sector Reforms in Times of Crisis: National Trajectories and International Comparisons, edited by S. Kuhlmann and G. Bouckaert, 301–315. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1961. Who Governs? Democracy and Power in the American City. New Haven, CT: Tale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delli Carpini, M. X., and S. Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• DeSantis, V. S., and T. Renner. 2002. “City Government Structures: An Attempt at Clarification.” State and Local Government Review 34 (2): 95–104. doi:10.1177/0160323X0203400202.
   Google Scholar
• Elcock, H., and J. Fenwick. 2007. “Comparing Elected Mayors.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 20 (3): 226–238. doi:10.1108/09513550710740625.
   Google Scholar
• Erick, B. 2015. “Does the Mayor’s Political Brand Matter? The Prospect of Statewide Parties’ Policy in Local Government.” Local Government Studies 41 (3): 339–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves de Arujo, J. F., and F. Tejedo-Romero. 2016. “Local Government Transparency Index: Determinants of Municipalities’ Ranking.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 29 (4): 327–347. doi:10.1108/IJPSM-11-2015-0199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, J., and H. Elcock. 2014. “Elected Mayors, Leading Locally?” Local Government Studies 40 (4): 581–599. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.836492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischel, W. A. 2011. The Homevoter Hypothesis: How Home Values Influence Government Taxation, School Finance, and Land-Use Policies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gay, C. 2012. “Moving to Opportunity: The Political Effects of a Housing Mobility Experiment.” Urban Affairs Review 48 (2): 147–179. doi:10.1177/1078087411426399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greca, R. 1998. “Evaluating the Change in Social Work Organization: Rhetoric, Institutionalization and Political Decision Making.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 11 (4): 314–334. doi:10.1108/09513559810225852.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. D. 1996. “Cities and Privatization: Examining the Effect of Fiscal Stress, Location, and Wealth in Medium Sized Cities.” Policy Studies Journal 24 (1): 135–144. doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1996.tb00557.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, Z., and J. Trounstine. 2005. “Where Turnout Matters: The Consequences of Uneven Turnout in City Politics.” The Journal of Politics 67 (2): 515–535. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00327.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, Z. L. 2010. America’s Uneven Democracy: Race, Turnout, and Representation in City Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajnal, Z. L., and J. Trounstine. 2010. “Who or What Governs? The Effects of Economics, Politics, Institutions, and Needs on Local Spending.” American Politics Research 38 (6): 1130–1163. doi:10.1177/1532673X10362870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajnal, Z. L., and P. G. Lewis. 2003. “Municipal Institutions and Voter Turnout in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (5): 645–668. doi:10.1177/1078087403038005002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, A., I. McLean, B. Taylor, and J. Curtice. 2003. “Between First and Second Order: A Comparision of Voting Behavior in European and Local Elections in Britain.” European Journal of Political Research 35 (3): 389–414. doi:10.1111/1475-6765.00454.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, V. 1997. “Medium Size Cities.” Regional Science and Urban Economics 27: 583–612. doi:10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02169-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T., and B. Heidbreder. 2010. “Does Measurement Matter? The Case of Vap and Vep in Models of Voter Turnout in the United States.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10 (2): 157–179. doi:10.1177/153244001001000203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T. M., and A. C. Weinschenk. 2014. “Campaigns, Mobilization, and Turnout in Mayoral Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 42–55. doi:10.1177/1065912913494018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holler, J. R., B. P., Rosendorff, and J. R. Vreeland. 2011. “Demogracy and Transparency.” The Journal of Politics 73 (4): 1191–1205.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. 2008. “Small Turnout, Large Problems: An Analysis of Political Participation in American Large City Mayor Elections.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwestern Political Science Association, Chicago, April 5.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, M., W. P. Shively, and R. M. Stein. 2002. “Contextual Data and the Study of Elections and Voting Behavior: Connecting Individuals to Environments.” Electoral Studies 21: 219–233. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00019-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jurjevich, J. R., P. Keisling, K. Rancik, and C. Gorecki. 2015. “Who Votes for Mayor?” PSU Pilot Research Report. http://www.whovotesformayor.org/about.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C., and D. Lowery. 2004. “Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts.” Urban Affairs Review 39 (6): 720–757. doi:10.1177/1078087404264219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., and M. E. Warner. 2017. “Geographies of Local Government Stress after the Great Recession.” Social Policy & Administration. doi:10.11111/spol/12307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H., C. Rallings, and M. Thrasher. 2004. “Electing Mayors: A Comparison of Different Electoral Procedures.” Local Government Studies 30 (4): 589–608. doi:10.1080/0300393042000318049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolsaker, A., and L. Lee-Kelley. 2008. “Citizens’ Attitudes Towards E-Government and E-Governance: A UK Study.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 21 (7): 723–738. doi:10.1108/09513550810904532.
   Google Scholar
• Kukovic, S., C. Copus, M. Hacek, and A. Blair. 2015. “Direct Mayoral Elections in Slovenia and England: Traditions and Trends Compared.” Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 13 (3): 697–718. doi:10.4335/13.3.697-718(2015).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapointe, S., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2018. “Effects of Municipal Mergers on Voter Turnout.” Local Government Studies 44: 512–530. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1465936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. 1960. The Politics of Nonpartisanship: A Study of California City Elections. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. 1997. “Unequal Participation: Democracy’s Unresolved Dilemma.” The American Political Science Review 91 (1): 1–14. doi:10.2307/2952255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lineberry, R. L., and E. P. Fowler. 1967. “Reformism and Public Policies in American Cities.” American Political Science Review 61: 701–716. doi:10.2307/1976089.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall, M., and J. Lappie. 2018. “Turnout in Local Elections: Is Timing Really Everything?” Election Law Journal 17 (3): 221–233. doi:10.1089/elj.2017.0462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattila, M. 2003. “Why Bother? Determinants of Turnout in the European Elections.” Electoral Studies 22 (3): 449–468. doi:10.1016/S0261-3794(01)00054-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. 2014. “Americans Still Trust Local Government More Than State.” Gallup. http://www.gallup.com/poll/176846/americans-trust-local-government-state.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• McDaniel, J. A. 2015. “Writing the Rules to Rank the Candidates: Examining the Impact of Instant-Runoff Voting on Racial Group Turnout in San Francisco Mayoral Election.” Journal of Urban Affairs 38 (3): 387–408. doi:10.1111/juaf.12209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. P., and S. L. Popkin. 2001. “The Myth of the Vanishing Voter.” The American Political Science Review 95 (4): 963–974.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W. E., and J. M. Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morckel, V., and G. Rybarczyk. 2015. “Improving Downtown in a Midsized Legacy City: Examining Responses to Potential Downtown Improvements in Flint, Michigan.” Community Development 46 (4): 341–360. doi:10.1080/15575330.2015.1061679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., S. E. Ha, and Z. Callen. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-Scale Democracy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Persily, N. 1997. “The Peculiar Geography of Direct Democracy: Why the Initiative, Referendum and Recall Developed in the American West.” Michical Law and Policy Review 2: 11–42.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pina, V., L. Torres, and S. Royo. 2010. “Is E-Government Promotive Convergence Towards More Accountable Local Governments?” International Journal of Public Sector Management 13 (4): 350–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rallings, C., M. Thrasher, and D. Denver. 2005. “Trends in Local Elections in Britain, 1975–2003.” Local Government Studies 31 (4): 33–413. doi:10.1080/03003930500136725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renner, T. 2013, “Two Mayoral Campaigns and What They Reveal about the Changing Face of Local Politics.” Illinois Wesleyan University Magazine, Winter 2013–2014 eds. https://www.iwu.edu/magazine/2013/winter/renner-election.html
   Google Scholar
• Rice, T. W., and H. Schlueter. 2004. “Turnout in Small Elections: Rational Choice, Community, and Socio-Demographics in Iowa Mayoral Contests.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of Midwestern Political Science Association, Chicago, IL, April 18.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, C., B. Pini, and K. Brown. 2007. “Beyond Stereotypes: An Exploratory Profile of Australian Woman Mayors.” Local Government Studies 31 (4): 433–448. doi:10.1080/03003930500136808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sass, T. R. 2000. “The Determinants of Hispanic Representation in Municipal Government.” Southern Economic Journal 66: 609–630. doi:10.2307/1061428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaap, L., H. Daemen, and A. Ringeling. 2009. “Mayors in Seven European Countries: Part I. Selection Procedures and Statutory Position.” Local Government Studies 35 (1): 95–108. doi:10.1080/03003930802574508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Šević, Z. 2005. “Measuring Performance on a Local Government Level in a Transitional Country: The Case of Serbia.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 18 (7): 582–603. doi:10.1108/09513550510624059.
   Google Scholar
• Strachan, J. 2012. “On Why Public Servants Must Cultivate Their Own Watchdogs.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 25 (2): 154–162. doi:10.1108/09513551211223794.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. 1956. “A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures.” The Journal of Political Economy 64: 416–424. doi:10.1086/257839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trounstine, J. 2012. “Turnout and Incumbency in Local Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 49 (2): 167–189. doi:10.1177/1078087412463536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, M., G. Homsy, and L. J. Morken. 2017. “Planning for Aging in Place: Stimulating a Market and Government Response.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 37 (1): 29–42. doi:10.1177/0739456X16642824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinger, R. E., and S. J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, C. 2002. “Voter Turnout in City Elections.” Urban Affairs Review 38 (2): 209–231. doi:10.1177/107808702237659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar