Municipality size, political efficacy and political participation: a systematic review

References

• Abelson, P. W. 1981. “Some Benefits of Small Local Government Areas.” Publius: the Journal of Federalism 11 (1): 129–140. doi:10.2307/3329649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberbach, J. D. 1969. “Alienation and Political Behavior.” The American Political Science Review 63 (1): 86–99. doi:10.2307/1954286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, P. 2003. “Why Smaller Councils Make Sense.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62 (3): 74–81. doi:10.1046/j.1467-8500.2003.00339.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almond, G. A., and S. Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balch, G. I. 1974. “Multiple Indicators in Survey Research: The Concept ‘Sense of Political Efficacy.’.” Political Methodology 1 (2): 1–43.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, B. R. 2003. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bendor, J., D. Diermeier, D. A. Siegal, and M. M. Ting. 2011. A Behavioral Theory of Elections. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, S. Serritzlew, and D. Treisman. 2016. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Government Policy Expenditure: Assessing the Effect of Municipal Amalgamation.” American Political Science Review 110 (4): 1–20. doi:10.1017/S0003055416000320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogdanor, V. 2006. The New Localism: Local Government and the Constitution. London: Gresham College. https://www.gresham.ac.uk/lectures-and-events/the-new-localism-local-government-and-the-constitution.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., S. Verba, and K. L. Schlozman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” The American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294. doi:10.2307/2082425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrnes, J., and B. Dollery. 2002. “Do Economies of Scale Exist in Australian Local Government? A Review of the Research Evidence.” Urban Policy and Research 20 (4): 391–414. doi:10.1080/0811114022000032618.
   Google Scholar
• Cameron, R., and C. Milne. 2013. “Size, Efficiency and Local Democracy in South Africa: A Preliminary Assessment.” African Journal of Public Affairs 6 (4): 1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, A., G. Gurin, and W. E. Miller. 1954. The Voter Decides. Evanston: Row, Peterson and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Caren, N. 2007. “Big City, Big Turnout? Electoral Participation in American Cities.” Journal of Urban Affairs 29 (1): 31–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00321.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, J. B., and A. Tavares. 2014. “City Size and Political Participation in Local Government: Reassessing the Contingent Effects of Residential Location Decisions within Urban Regions.” Urban Affairs Review 50 (2): 269–302. doi:10.1177/1078087413518171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., and M. A. Maggiotto. 1981. “Political Discontent and Political Action.” The Journal of Politics 43 (2): 514–522. doi:10.2307/2130380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, S. C., R. G. Niemi, and G. E. Silver. 1990. “Political Efficacy and Trust : A Report on the NES Pilot Study Items.” Political Behavior 12 (3): 289–314. doi:10.1007/BF00992337.
   Google Scholar
• Dagger, R. 1981. “Metropolis, Memory, and Citizenship.” American Journal of Political Science 25 (4): 715–737. doi:10.2307/2110760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. 1967. “The City in the Future of Democracy.” American Political Science Review 61 (4): 953–970. doi:10.2307/1953398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford, USA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B. 2002. “Size and Political Trust: Evidence from Denmark, the Netherlands, Norway, and the United Kingdom.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20: 793–812. doi:10.1068/c0225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. E. Mouritzen, and L. E. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• DIRD (Department of Infrastructure and Regional Development). 2015. “Local Government National Report 2012–13.” 2012–13 Report on the Operation of the Local Government (Financial Assistance) Act 1995. Canberra. http://regional.gov.au/local/publications/reports/2012_2013/INFRA2378_LGNR_2012-13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, P., A.-K. Kölln, and S. Turper. 2015. “External Efficacy and Perceived Responsiveness - Similar but Distinct Concepts.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 27 (3): 432–445. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edv003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M., G. Stoker, and J. Nasir. 2013. How Do Australians Imagine Their Democracy? Australian Survey of Political Engagement Findings 2013. Canberra: ANZSOG Institute for Governance, University of Canberra. http://www.governanceinstitute.edu.au/magma/media/upload/ckeditor/files/DEMOCRACYREPORT-UPDATEDVERSION-27-6-13.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Finifter, A. W., and P. R. Abramson. 1975. “City Size and Feelings of Political Competence.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 39 (2): 189–198. doi:10.1086/268215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, G. A. 2002. “Size and Electoral Participation in Local Elections.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 853–869. doi:10.1068/c0228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendzwill, A., and P. Swianiewicz. 2016. “Does Local Democracy Perform Better in Smaller Jurisdictions? Survey Evidence from Poland.” Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 14 (4): 759–782. doi:10.4335/14.4.759-782(2016)ISSN.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S. W. 2013. “Polity Size and Local Political Trust: A Quasi-Experiment Using Municipal Mergers in Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 36 (1): 43–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00296.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hay, C. 2007. Why We Hate Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heinisch, R., T. Lehner, A. Mühlböck, and C. H. Schimpf. 2018. “How Do Municipal Amalgamations Affect Turnout in Local Elections? Insights from the 2015 Municipal Reform in the Austrian State of Styria.” Local Government Studies 44 (4): 465–491. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1465935.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, D. 2006. Models of Democracy. Third. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, T. M., and A. C. Weinschenk. 2014. “Campaigns, Mobilization, and Turnout in Mayoral Elections.” Political Research Quarterly 67 (1): 42–55. doi:10.1177/1065912913494018.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, J., and Y. Deng. 2017. “Jurisdiction Scale Matters: County Size and External Political Efficacy in China.” Political Studies 65 (4): 966–982. doi:10.1177/0032321717695292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C., and D. Lowery. 2004. “Political Participation and Metropolitan Institutional Contexts.” Urban Affairs Review 39 (6): 720–757. doi:10.1177/1078087404264219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kesselman, M. 1966. “French Local Politics: A Statistical Examination of Grass Roots Consensus.” The American Political Science Review 60 (4): 963–973. doi:10.2307/1953769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, P., and P. E. Rochat. 2017. “The Effects of Local Government Consolidation on Turnout: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1111/spsr.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, A. 2002. “Size and Direct Democracy at the Local Level: The Case of Switzerland.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 813–828. doi:10.1068/c0226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapointe, S., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2018. “Effects of Municipal Mergers on Voter Turnout.” Local Government Studies 44 (4): 512–530. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1465936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen, C. A. 2002. “Municipal Size and Democracy: A Critical Analysis of the Argument of Proximity Based on the Case of Denmark.” Scandinavian Political Studies 25 (4): 317–332. doi:10.1111/1467-9477.00074.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lassen, D. D., and S. Serritzlew. 2011. “Jurisdiction Size and Local Democracy: Evidence on Internal Political Efficacy from Large-Scale Municipal Reform.” American Political Science Review 105 (02): 238–258. doi:10.1017/S000305541100013X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. 2003. “Amalgamation and Virtual Local Government.” In Reshaping Australian Local Government: Finance, Governance and Reform, edited by B. Dollery, N. Marshall, and A. Worthington, 79–98. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morlan, R. L. 1984. “Municipal Vs National Election Voter Turnout: Europe and the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (3): 457–470. doi:10.2307/2149943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, M. E. 2003. “Survey and Experimental Evidence for a Reliable and Valid Measure of Internal Political Efficacy.” The Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (4): 589–602. doi:10.1086/378965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 1976. “Is Small Really so Beautiful? Is Big Really so Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government.” Political Studies XXX (2): 190–206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00532.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemi, R. G., S. C. Craig, and F. Mattei. 1991. “Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study.” The American Political Science Association 85 (4): 1407–1413. doi:10.2307/1963953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 1999. “The Effects of Metropolitan Economic Segregation on Local Civic Participation.” American Journal of Political Science 43 (1): 186–212. doi:0.2307/2991790.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” The American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. doi:10.2307/2586017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, P. H. 1983. “The Participatory Consequences of Internal and External Political Efficacy: A Research Note.” The Western Political Quarterly 36 (3): 400–409. doi:10.1177/106591298303600306.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rodrigues, M., and O. D. Meza. 2018. “‘Is There Anybody Out There?’ Political Implications of a Territorial Integration.” Journal of Urban Affairs 40 (3): 426–440. Routledge. doi:10.1080/07352166.2017.1360732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, L. E. 2002. “Municipal Size and Local Nonelectoral Participation: Findings from Denmark, the Netherlands, and Norway.” Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 20 (6): 829–851. doi:10.1068/c0227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenstone, S. J., and J. M. Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York: MacMillan Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Rysavy, D., and J. Bernard. 2013. “Size and Local Democracy: The Case of Czech Municipal Representatives.” Local Government Studies 39 (6): 833–852. doi:10.1080/03003930.2012.675329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saglie, J., and S. I. Vabo. 2009. “Size and E-Democracy: Online Participation in Norwegian Local Politics.” Scandinavian Political Studies 32 (4): 382–401. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2009.00235.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soul, S. 1999. “The Effect of Population Size on Economic and Political Effectiveness: Some Empirical Evidence Based on the Performance of Local Government Jurisdictions in the Australian State of New South Wales.” Regional Policy and Practice 8 (1): 49–52.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. 2006. Why Politics Matters: Making Democracy Work. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Swianiewicz, P. 2018. “If Territorial Fragmentation Is a Problem, Is Amalgamation a Solution?–Ten Years Later.” Local Government Studies 44 (1): 1–10. Routledge. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1403903.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and J. B. Carr. 2013. “So Close, yet so Far Away? the Effects of City Size, Density and Growth on Local Civic Participation.” Journal of Urban Affairs 35 (3): 283–302. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9906.2012.00638.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-Study.” Local Government Studies 43 (3): 408–428. Routledge. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Verba, S., K. L. Schlozman, and H. E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge. Massachusetts, USA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2002. “Local Political Competence in Europe: A Resource of Legitimacy for Higher Levels of Government?” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14 (1): 3–18. doi:10.1093/ijpor/14.1.3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitehead, D. 1986. The Demes of Attica - 508/7-CA. 250 B.C.: A Political and Social Study. Princeton, New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, K. 2012. “Theory Building and Testing in Citizen Participation Research: Reflection and Conjecture.” In The State of Citizen Participation in America, edited by H. L. Schachter and K. Yang, 447–464. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Zeedan, R. 2017. “Bigger but Not Always Better: Size and Democracy in Israeli Amalgamated Local Governments.” Journal of Urban Affairs 39 (5): 711–728. Routledge. doi:10.1080/07352166.2016.1262701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar