Local government projectification in practice – a multiple institutional logic perspective

References

• Ahrne, G., and N. Brunsson. 2008. Meta-Organizations. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., and V. Johansson. 2010. “Sweden.” In Changing Government Relations in Europe, edited by M. J. Goldsmith and E. P. Page, 198-209. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, S., K. Checkland, D. Hodgson, A. McBride, R. Elvey, S. Parkin, K. Rothwell, and D. Pierides. 2017. “The Policy Work of Piloting: Mobilising and Managing Conflict and Ambiguity in the English NHS.” Social Science and Medicine 179: 210–217. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.02.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, A. 2007. “For Love and Money: Organizations’ Creative Responses to Multiple Environmental Logics.” Theory and Society 36 (6): 547–571. doi:10.1007/s11186-007-9045-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Büttner, S. M., and L. M. Leopold. 2016. “A 'New Spirit' Of Public Policy? The Project World Of Eu Funding.” European Journal Of Cultural and Political Sociology 3 (1): 41–71. doi: 10.1080/23254823.2016.1183503.
   Google Scholar
• Byrkjeflot, H., and P. Du Gay. 2012. “Bureaucracy: An Idea Whose Time Has Come (Again)?” In Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy – From the Bureau to Network Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Volume 35), edited by Diefenbach and Todnem, 85–109. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, J., D. Bainton, N. Lendvai, and P. Stubbs. 2015. Making Policy Move: Towards a Politics of Translation and Assemblage. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Devault, M. L., and L. McCoy. 2006. “Institutional Ethnography: Using Interviews to Investigate Ruling Relations.” In Institutional Ethnography as Practice, edited by E. D. Smith, 15-44. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, .
   Google Scholar
• Diefenbach, R., and B. R. Todnem, ed. 2012. Reinventing Hierarchy and Bureaucracy – From the Bureau to Network Organizations (Research in the Sociology of Organizations). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn, M. R., and C. Jones. 2010. “Institutional Logics and Institutional Pluralism: The Contestation of Care and Science Logics in Medical Education, 1967—2005.” Administrative Science Quarterly 55 (1): 114–149. doi:10.2189/asqu.2010.55.1.114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellström, P. E. 2009. “The Use of Evaluation: A Learning Perspective.” In Learning through Ongoing Evaluation, edited by L. Svensson, G. Brulin, S. Jansson, and K. Sjöberg, 107–132. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Fisker, J. 1995. Forsøgsprojekter Og Offentlige Organisationer [Pilots and Public Organizations]. Köpenhamn: AKF Forlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, R., and Fincham, T. 2015. Three's a Crowd: The Role of Inter‐Logic Relationships in Highly Complex Institutional Fields. British Journal of Management26 (4): 657-670.
   Google Scholar
• Fred, M. 2018. Projectification, the Trojan Horse of Local Government. Lund: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., and R. R. Alford. 1991. “Bringing Society Back In: Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions.” In The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, edited by W. W. Powell and P. DiMaggio, 232–263. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Godenhjelm, S. 2016. Project Organizations and Governance – Processes, Actors, Actions, and Participatory Procedures, 11. Helsinki: Publications of the Faculty of Social Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Goodrick, E., and T. Ray. 2011. “Constellations of Institutional Logics. Changes in the Professional Work of Pharmacists.” Work and Occupations 38 (3): 372–416. doi:10.1177/0730888411406824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodsell, C. T. 2004. The Case for Bureaucracy: A Public Administration Polemic. fourth ed. Washington, DC: CQ Books.
   Google Scholar
• Grabher, G. 2002. “Cool Projects, Boring Institutions: Temporary Collaboration in Social Context’ in Production in Projects: Economic Geographies of Temporary Collaboration.” In Regional Studies, Special Issue, edited by G. Grabher, Vol. 36(3), 205–215.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, R., M. Raynard, F. Kodeih, E. R. Micelotta, and M. Lounsbury. 2011. “Institutional Complexity and Organizational Responses.” The Academy of Management Annals 5 (1): 317–371. doi:10.5465/19416520.2011.590299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidelines, 2014. Riktlinjer för projekt. [Guidelines for project work]. Eslöv kommun
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. 2012. Managementbyråkrati: Organisationspolitisk Makt I Svensk Offentlig Förvaltning [Management Bureaucracy: Organization of Political Power in the Swedish Public Administration]. Liber: Malmö.
   Google Scholar
• Hallett, T., and M. Ventresca. 2006. “Inhabited Institutions: Social Interaction and Organizational Forms in Gouldner’s Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy.” Theory and Society 35 (2): 213–236. doi:10.1007/s11186-006-9003-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, L. 2010. Public Procurement at the Local Government Level. Actor Roles, Discretion and Constraints in the Implementation of Public Transport Goals. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science No. 528 Linköping University. Department of Thematic Studies Linköping.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. 2004. “Project Work: The Legacy Of Bureaucratic Control in The Post-bureaucratic Organization.” Organization 11 (1): 81-100. doi:10.1177/1350508404039659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D. Fred, M. Bailey, and S. Hall. 2019. Projectification of the Public Sector. New York: Routledge Critical Studies in Public Management.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, A., C. Thuesen, and J. Geraldi. 2016. “The Projectification of Everything: Projects as a Human Condition.” Project Management Journal 47 (3): 21–34. doi:10.1177/875697281604700303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson, T. 2019. “Public Administration in Transition. Studying Understandings and Legitimations Amongst Middle Managers within a Government Agency.” Journal of Language and Politics. doi:10.1075/jlp.17070.kar.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, T., and H. Bäck. 2008. Governing and Governance in Sweden. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Lindberg, K. 2014. “Performing Multiple Logics in Practice.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30 (4): 485–497. doi:10.1016/j.scaman.2013.12.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Löfström, M. 2010. “Inter-Organizational Collaboration Projects in Public Sector – A Balance between Integration and Demarcation.” International Journal of Health Planning and Management 25 (2): 136–155. doi:10.1002/hpm.1003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, R. A., N. Arvidsson, T. Brady, E. Ekstedt, C. Midler, and J. Sydow. 2015. Managing and Working in Project Society. Institutional Challenges of Temporary Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lundin, R., . A., and A. Söderholm. 1995. “A Theory of the Temporary Organization.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 11 (4): 437–455. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(95)00036-U.
   Google Scholar
• Maylor, H., T. Brady, T. Cooke-Davies, and D. Hodgson. 2006. “From Projectification to Programmification.” International Journal of Project Management 24 (8): 663–674. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2006.09.014.
   Google Scholar
• Midler, C. 1995. “Projectification of the Firm: The Renault Case.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 11 (4): 363–375. doi:10.1016/0956-5221(95)00035-T.
   Google Scholar
• Montin, S., and M. Granberg. 2013. Moderna kommuner [Modern municipalities]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, L. 2017. Market Bureaucracy. Neoliberalism, Competition, and EU State Aid Policy. Lund: Department of Political Science, Lund University.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, A. L. 2017. “Responding to Problems: Actions are Rewarded, Regardless of the Outcome.” Public Management Review 19 (9–10): 1352–1364. doi:10.1080/14719037.2017.1281998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A., and F. Santos. 2010. “When Worlds Collide: The Internal Dynamics of Organizational Responses to Conflicting Institutional Demands.” Academy of Management Review 35 (3): 455–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Packendorff, J., and M. Lindgren. 2014. “Projectification and Its Consequences: Narrow and Broad Conceptualisations.” South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences 17 (1): 7–21. doi:10.4102/sajems.v17i1.807.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, R., and L. Bradley. 2004. “Bureaucracy or Post-Bureaucracy? Public Sector Organisations in a Changing Context.” Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration 26 (2): 197–215. doi:10.1080/23276665.2004.10779293.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2003. “Dismantling and Rebuilding the Weberian State.” In Governing Europe, edited by J. Hayward and A. Menon, 113-127. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poulsen, B. 2009. “Public Administration in Teams: Self-Governing Civil Servants.” In The Politics of Self-Governance, edited by E. Sørensen and P. Trantafilou, 150-167. London and New York: Ashgate Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, W. W. 2001. “A New Logic of Organizing: Causes and Processes of Diffusion.” Studia oeconomiae negotiorum. Uppsala: Universitetsbibliotek.
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J., and B. Gray. 2009. “Conflicting Logics, Mechanisms of Diffusion, and Multilevel Dynamics in Emerging Institutional Fields.” Academy of Management Journal 52 (2): 355–380. doi:10.5465/amj.2009.37308255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reay, T., and C., . R. Hinings. 2009. “Managing the Revelry of Competing Institutional Logics.” Organization Studies 30 (6): 629–652. doi:10.1177/0170840609104803.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rhodes, C., and O. Milani Price. 2010. “The Post-bureaucratic Parasite: Contrasting Narratives of Organizational Change in Local Government.” Management Learning 42 (3): 241-260. doi:10.1177/1350507610385765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sahlin, I., Ed. 1996. Projektets Paradoxer [Paradoxes of the Project]. Lund: Studentlitteratur.
   Google Scholar
• Schoper, Y. G., A. Wald, H. T. Ingason, and T. V. Fridgeirsson. 2018. “Projectification in Western Economies: A Comparative Study of Germany, Norway and Iceland.” International Journal of Project Management 36 (1): 71–82. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seawright, J., and J. Gerring. 2008. “Case Selection Techniques in case Study Research: A Menu of Qualitative and Quantitative Options.” Political Research Quarterly 61: 294–308. doi:10.1177/1065912907313077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjöblom, S. 2009. “Administrative Short-Termism – A Non-Issue in Environmental and Regional Governance.” Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 11 (3): 165–168. doi:10.1080/15239080903033747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C., and S. R. Smith. 2014. “Theorizing Hybridity: Institutional Logics, Complex Organizations, and Actor Identities: The Case of Non-Profits.” Public Administration 93 (2): 433–448. doi:10.1111/padm.12105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smets, M., T. Morris, and R. Greenwood. 2012. “From Practice to Field: A Multilevel Model of Practice-Driven Institutional Change.” Academy of Management Journal 55 (4): 877–904. doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, D. E. 1999. Writing the Social: Theory, Critique, Investigations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Styhre, A. 2007. The Innovative Bureaucracy. Bureaucracy in an Age of Fluidity. Routledge Studies in Innovation, Organization and Technology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H. 2004. Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., and W. Ocasio. 1999. “Institutional Logics and the Historical Contingency of Power in Organizations.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3): 801–843. doi:10.1086/210361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., W. Ocasio, and M. Lounsbury. 2012. The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wald, A., C. Schneider, T. Spanuth, and Y. Schoper. 2015. “Towards A Measurement of “Projectification”: A Study on the Share of Project–Work in the German Economy.” Advanced Project Management: Flexibility and Innovative Capacity 4: 18–36.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, M. 1948. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar