Mind the gap, please! Pinpointing the influence of municipal size on local electoral participation

References

• Baybeck, B. 2014. “Local Political Participation.” In The Oxford Handbook of State and Local Government, edited by D. P. Haider-Markel, 95–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., and K. M. Hansen. 2019. “Voter Turnout and Municipal Amalgamations – Evidence from Denmark.” Local Government Studies  45 (5): 697–723. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1563540
   Google Scholar
• Bhatti, Y., K. M. Hansen, and H. Wass. 2012. “The Relationship between Age and Turnout: A Roller-coaster Ride.” Electoral Studies 31 (3): 588–593. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2012.05.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, A. 2000. To Vote or Not to Vote? The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, J., K. Houlberg, and S. Serritzlew. 2014. “Democracy, and the Economic Costs of Running the Political System.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (4): 790–803. doi:10.1111/ajps.12096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, S., T. Donovan, and J. Snipp. 1993. “Local Sources of Information and Voter Choice in State Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 21 (4): 473–489. doi:10.1177/1532673X9302100405.
   Google Scholar
• Brady, H. E., S. Verba, and K. L. Schlozman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (2): 271–294. doi:10.2307/2082425.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breux, S., J. Couture, and N. Goodman. 2017. “Fewer Voters, Higher Stakes? the Applicability of Rational Choice for Voter Turnout in Quebec Municipalities.” Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space 35 (6): 990–1009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breux, S., J. Couture, and R. Koop. 2017. “Turnout in Local Elections: Evidence from Canadian Cities, 2004–2014.” Canadian Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 699–722. doi:10.1017/S000842391700018X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cancela, J., and B. Geys. 2016. “‘Explaining Voter Turnout: A Meta-analysis of National and Subnational Elections.” Electoral Studies 42 (2): 264–275. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2016.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, D. 2004. The Nationalization of Politics. The Formation of National Electorates and Party Systems in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cassel, C. A. 2003. “Overreporting And Electoral Participation Research.” American Politics Research 31 (1): 81–92. doi:10.1177/1532673X02238581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A., and E. R. Tufte. 1973. Size and Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Denters, B., M. Goldsmith, A. Ladner, P. E. Mouritzen, and L. E. Rose. 2014. Size and Local Democracy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Ebinger, F., S. Kuhlmann, and J. Bogumil. 2019. “Territorial Reforms in Europe: Effects on Administrative Performance and Democratic Participation.” Local Government Studies 45 (1): 1–23. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1530660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frandsen, A. G. 2002. “Size and Electoral Participation in Local Elections.” Environment and Planning C: Government & Policy 20 (6): 853–869. doi:10.1068/c0228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendźwiłł, A. forthcoming. “Local Autonomy and National–local Turnout Gap: Higher Stakes, Higher Turnout?” Regional & Federal Studies. doi:10.1080/13597566.2019.1706496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gendźwiłł, A., U. Kjaer, and K. Steyvers, eds. forthcoming. Routledge Handbook of European Local Elections and Voting. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Y. 2005. Institutions, Incentives and Electoral Participation in Japan: Cross-level and Cross-national Perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge Curzon.
   Google Scholar
• Karp, J. A., and D. Brockington. 2005. “Social Desirability and Response Validity: A Comparative Analysis of Overreporting Voter Turnout in Five Countries.” The Journal of Politics 67 (3): 825–840. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00341.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelleher, C. A., and D. Lowery. 2009. “Central City Size, Metropolitan Institutions and Political Participation.” British Journal of Political Science 39 (1): 59–92. doi:10.1017/S0007123408000392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, G., M. A. Tanner, and O. Rosen, eds. 2004. Ecological Inference: New Methodological Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kjaer, U., and J. Elklit. 2010. “Local Party System Nationalisation: Does Municipal Size Matter?” Local Government Studies 36 (3): 425–444. doi:10.1080/03003931003730451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjaer, U., and K. Steyvers. 2019. “Second Thoughts on Second-order? Towards a Second-tier Model of Local Government Elections and Voting.” In The Routledge Handbook of International Local Government, edited by R. Kerley, J. Liddle, and P. T. Dunning, 405–417. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knack, S. 1992. “Civic Norms, Social Sanctions, and Voter Turnout.” Rationality and Society 4 (2): 133–156. doi:10.1177/1043463192004002002.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, P., and P. E. Rochat. 2017. “The Effects of Local Government Consolidation on Turnout: Evidence from a Quasi-Experiment in Switzerland.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (3): 215–230. doi:10.1111/spsr.12269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, A., N. Keuffer, H. Baldersheim, N. Hlepas, P. Swianiewicz, K. Steyvers, and C. Navarro. 2019. Patterns of Local Autonomy in Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lapointe, S., T. Saarimaa, and J. Tukiainen. 2018. “Effects of Municipal Mergers on Voter Turnout.” Local Government Studies 44 (4): 512–530. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1465936.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinsen, K., and C. S. Pedersen. 2006. “Unge Og Kommunalpolitik - Engagement Og Politisk.” Politica 38 (1): 57–77. doi:10.7146/politica.v38i1.69849.
   Google Scholar
• Lidström, A. 2006. “Commuting and Citizen Participation in Swedish City‐regions.” Political Studies 54 (4): 865–888. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.2006.00637.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loughlin, J., F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström. 2011. “Subnational Democracy in Europe: Changing Backgrounds and Theoretical Models.” In The Oxford Handbook of Local and Regional Democracy in Europe, edited by J. Louglin, F. Hendriks, and A. Lidström, 1–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morlan, R. L. 1984. “Municipal Vs. National Election Voter Turnout: Europe and the United States.” Political Science Quarterly 99 (3): 457–470. doi:10.2307/2149943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, B. J., J. Johnson, and P. L. Lown. 2014. “The ‘Daily Grind’ Work, Commuting, and Their Impact on Political Participation.” American Politics Research 42 (1): 141–170. doi:10.1177/1532673X13498265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newton, K. 1982. “Is Small Really so Beautiful? Is Big Really so Ugly? Size, Effectiveness, and Democracy in Local Government.” Political Studies 30 (2): 190–206. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9248.1982.tb00532.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E. 2000. “City Size and Civic Involvement in Metropolitan America.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 361–373. doi:10.2307/2586017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, J. E., S. E. Ha, and Z. Callen. 2012. Local Elections and the Politics of Small-scale Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, G., and B. Grofman. 1984. “To Vote or Not to Vote: The Paradox of Nonvoting.” Public Choice 42 (3): 311–325. doi:10.1007/BF00124949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palfrey, T. R., and H. Rosenthal. 1985. “Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty.” American Political Science Review 79 (1): 62–78. doi:10.2307/1956119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, K., and H. Schmitt. 1980. “Nine Second-Order National Elections – A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results.” European Journal of Political Research 8 (1): 3–44. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1980.tb00737.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokkan, S. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Ross, B. H., and M. A. Levine. 2001. Urban Politics: Power in Metropolitan America. Itasca: F.E. Peacock.
   Google Scholar
• Schakel, A. H., and R. Dandoy. 2014. “Electoral Cycles and Turnout in Multilevel Electoral Systems.” West European Politics 37 (3): 605–623. doi:10.1080/01402382.2014.895526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, H., and R. Mannheimer. 1991. ““About Voting and Non‐voting in the European Elections of June 1989.” European Journal of Political Research 19 (1): 31–54. doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.1991.tb01176.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers, J. M. 2013. “Place, Institutions and the Political Ecology of US Metropolitan Areas.” In The Political Ecology of the Metropolis: Metropolitan Sources of Electoral Behaviour in Eleven Countries, edited by J. Sellers, D. Kübler, R. A. Walks, and M. Walter-Rogg, 37–86. Colchester: ECPR Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F. 2018. “Municipal Amalgamations and Their Effects: A Literature Review.” Miscellanea Geographica. Regional Studies on Development 22 (1): 5–15. doi:10.2478/mgrsd-2018-0005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavares, A. F., and R. Raudla. 2018. “Size, Density and Small Scale Elections: A Multi-level Analysis of Voter Turnout in Sub-municipal Governments.” Electoral Studies 56: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2018.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Houwelingen, P. 2017. “Political Participation and Municipal Population Size: A Meta-study.” Local Government Studies 43 (3): 408–428. doi:10.1080/03003930.2017.1300147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verba, S., and N. H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America – Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Vetter, A. 2007. Local Politics: A Resource for Democracy in Western Europe? Lanham: Lexington Books.
   Google Scholar
• Zarycki, T. 2015. “The Electoral Geography of Poland: Between Stable Spatial Structures and Their Changing Interpretations.” Erdkunde 69 (2): 107–124. doi:10.3112/erdkunde.2015.02.02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar