Measuring the effect of performance management in local economic development policy: the case of tax increment finance districts in the Dallas-Ft. Worth metroplex

References

• Addie, J. P. D. 2019. “Urban(izing) University Strategic Planning: An Analysis of London and New York City.” Urban Affairs Review 55 (6): 1612–1645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam, K., M. O. Erdiaw-Kwasie, M. Shahiduzzaman, and B. Ryan. 2018. “Assessing Regional Digital Competence: Digital Futures and Strategic Planning Implications.” Journal of Rural Studies 60: 60–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ammons, D. N. 1995. “Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement in Local Government: The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services.” Public Administration Review 55 (1): 37–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, C. E., and J. L. Hall. 2012. “Exploring Management Practice Variation in Tax Increment Financing Districts: Toward an Administrative Theory of Performance.” Economic Development Quarterly 26 (1): 13–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauwens, R., M. Audenaert, and A. Decramer. 2019. “Fostering Societal Impact and Job Satisfaction: The Role of Performance Management and Leader–Member Exchange.” Public Management Review 21 (10): 1486–1515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berman, E., and X. Wang. 2002. “Performance Measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for Reform.” Public Administration Review 60 (5): 409–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohte, J., and M. J. Kenneth. 2000. “Goal Displacement: Assessing the Motivation for Organizational Cheating.” Public Administration Review 60 (2): 173–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyne, G. 2001. “Planning, Performance and Public Services.” Public Administration 79 (1): 73–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, T. K., and E. J. Blakely. 1999. “What are “Third-wave” State Economic Development Efforts? from Incentives to Industrial Policy.” Economic Development Quarterly 13 (3): 229–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brorström, S., D. Argento, G. Grossi, A. Thomasson, and R. Almqvist. 2018. “Translating Sustainable and Smart City Strategies into Performance Measurement System.” Public Money & Management 38 (3): 193–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brusca, I. 2016. “Implementing Performance Reporting in Local Government: A Cross-Countries Comparison.” Public Performance & Management Review 39 (3): 506–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M. 2011. Strategic Planning for Public and Nonprofit Organizations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Charbonneau, E., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2015. “Benchmarks and Citizen Judgments of Local Government Performance: Findings from a Survey Experiment.” Public Management Reivew 17 (2): 288–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S.-H., R. C. Feiock, and J. Y. Hsieh. 2016. “Regional Partnerships and Metropolitan Economic Development.” Journal of Urban Affairs 38 (2): 196–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. E., and G. L. Gaile. 1998. The Work of Cities. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, G. M., and J. E. Harris. 2001. “A Heuristic Framework for Framework for Accountability in Government Subunits.” Public Management Review 3 (3/4): 145–165.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, G. M., and J. E. Harris. 2005. “Toward A Theory of Performance Reporting to Achieve Public Sector Accountability: A Field Study.” Public Budgeting and Finance 25 (2): 15–42.
   Google Scholar
• Dincecco, M., and K. Gabriel. 2016. “State Capacity and Long-run Economic Performance.” The Economic Journal 126 (590): 189–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubnick, M. 2005. “Accountability and the Promise of Performance: In Search of the Mechanisms.” Public Performance & Management Review 28 (3): 376–417.
   Google Scholar
• Efron, B., T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani. 2004. “Least Angle Regression.” Annals of Statistics 32 (2): 407–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinger, P. 1995. “State Economic Development in the 1990s: Politics and Policy Learning.” Economic Development Quarterly 9 (2): 146–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fried, Y., and L. H. Slowick. 2004. “Enriching Goal-Setting Theory with Time: An Integrated Approach.” Academy of Management Review 29 (3): 404–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuka, J., P. Lesakova, and R. Bata. 2018. “Sustainable Value as a Tool for Performance Measurement of the Region.” Lex Localis-Journal of Local Self-Government 16 (4): 693–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, B. in press. “Successful Strategic Plan Implementation in Public Organizations: Connecting People, Process, and Plan (3ps).” Public Administration Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerrish, E. 2016. “The Impact of Performance Management on Performance in Public Organizations: A Meta-analysis.„ Public Administration Review 76 (1): 48–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L. 2007. “Developing Historical 50-State Indices of Innovation Capacity and Commercialization Capacity.„ Economic Development Quarterly 21 (2): 107–123. doi:10.1177/0891242406298128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L., and M. E. Howell-Moroney. 2012. “Poverty, Innovation Capacity, and State Economic Development in the Knowledge Economy: Evidence from the U.S.„ Growth and Change 43 (2): 228–251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L., and C. E. Bartels. 2014. “Management Practice Variation in Tax Increment Financing Districts: An Empirical Examination of the Administrative Theory of Performance.” Economic Development Quarterly 28 (3): 270–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, J. L., and D. Z. Kanaan. in press. “State Tax Policy, Municipal Choice, and Local Economic Development Outcomes: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach to Performance Assessment.” Public Administration Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindman, M. 2015. “Building Better Models: Prediction, Replication, and Machine Learning in the Social Sciences.” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 659 (1): 48–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, E. T. 2012. “Organizational Culture and Effects of Performance Measurement.” Public Administration Review 72 (S1): S93–S94.
   Google Scholar
• Johnsen, A. 2018. “Impacts of Strategic Planning and Management in Municipal Government: An Analysis of Subjective Survey and Objective Production and Efficiency Measures in Norway.” Public Management Review 20 (3): 397–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., M. Ruther, S. Ehresman, and B. Nickerson. 2017. “Placemaking as an Economic Development Strategy for Small and Midsized Cities.” Urban Affairs Review 53 (3): 435–462.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwon, M., F. S. Berry, and R. C. Feiock. 2009. “Understanding the Adoption and Timing of Economic Development Strategies in U.S. Cities Using Innovation and Institutional Analysis.„ Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (4): 967–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latham, G. P. 2004. “The Motivational Benefits of Goal-setting.” Academy of Management Executive 18 (4): 126–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. W., and S. E. Kim. 2012. “Searching for a Strategic Fit.” Public Performance & Management Review 36 (1): 31–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindblad, M. R. 2006. “Performance Measurement in Local Economic Development.” Urban Affairs Review 41 (5): 646–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melkers, J., and K. Willoughby. 2005. “Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects.” Public Administration Review 65 (2): 180–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., and S. K. Pandey. 2010. “The Big Question for Performance Management: Why Do Managers Use Performance Information?” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20 (4): 849–866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcomer, K., and S. Caudle. 2011. “Public Performance Management Systems.” Public Performance & Management Review 35 (1): 108–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noto, G., and L. Noto. 2019. “Local Strategic Planning and Stakeholder Analysis: Suggesting a Dynamic Performance Management Approach.” Public Organization Review 19: 293–310.
   Google Scholar
• Oates, W. E. 1972. Fiscal Federalism. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• Overton, M. R. 2018. “Market Differentiation and the Adoption of Economic Development Strategies: Explaining Policy Adoption in Metropolitan Areas.” Review of Regional Studies 48 (3): 299–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. 1995. The Price of Federalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H. 2010. “The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector: Linking Strategic Management and Performance.” Public Administration Review 70 (S1): S246–S254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., M. P. Aristigueta, and J. L. Hall. 2014. Managing and Measuring Performance in Public and Nonprofit Organizations: An Integrated Approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., L. H. Edwards, O. Q. Pasha, and J. Edwards. 2013. “Strategy Formulation and Performance.” Public Performance & Management Review 36 (4): 585–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poister, T. H., O. Q. Pasha, and L. H. Edwards. 2013. “Does Performance Management Lead to Better Outcomes? Evidence from the U.S. Public Transit Industry.” Public Administration Review 73 (4): 625–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C. 2006. “Performance Information for Democracy. The Missing Link?” Evaluation 12 (1): 38–55.
   Google Scholar
• Radnor, Z. J., and D. Barnes. 2007. “Historical Analysis of Performance Measurement and Management in Operations Management.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 56 (5/6): 384–396.
   Google Scholar
• Shin, G. 2019. “Federal Welfare Grants, Innovation, and State Economic Performance: Evidence from American Federalism.” Public Policy and Administration 34 (3): 349–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, R., and G. G. Van Ryzin. 2014. “Are Performance Management Practices Associated with Better Outcomes? Empirical Evidence from New York Public Schools.” American Review of Public Administration 44 (3): 324–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Texas Property Tax Code Title 3, Subchapter B, Section 311- Tax Increment Financing Act. Accessed 5 February 2015. http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/TX/htm/TX.311.htm
   Google Scholar
• Tibshirani, R. 1996. “Regression Shrinkage and Selection via the Lasso.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 58 (1): 267–288.
   Google Scholar
• T-K, H. A. 2018. “From Performance Budgeting to Performance Budget Management: Theory and Practice.” Public Administration Review 78 (5): 748–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., and F. Cornelissen. 2014. “Performance Reporting.” In The Oxford Handbook on Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 441–455. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Ryzin, G. G., and C. F. Lavena. 2013. “The Credibility of Government Performance Reporting.” Public Performance & Management Review 37 (1): 87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, R. M., F. Damanpour, and C. A. Devece. 2011. “Management Innovation and Organizational Performance: The Mediating Effect of Performance Management.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21 (2): 367–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weikart, L. A. 2001. “The Giuliani Administration and the New Public Management in New York City.” Urban Affairs Review 36 (3): 359–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. 1995. “The Economic Role of Political Institutions: Market-Preserving Federalism and Economic Development.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (1): 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K. 2009. “Examining Perceived Honest Performance Reporting by Public Organizations: Bureaucratic Politics and Organizational Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19 (1): 81–105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yong, A. G., and S. Pearce. 2013. “A Beginner’s Guide to Factor Analysis: Focusing on Exploratory Factor Analysis.” Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology 9 (2): 79–94.
   Google Scholar