Platforms as distinctive realms and the role of policy discretion: a cross-platform assessment of citizen engagement with Dutch municipalities through Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, and Instagram

References

• Agostino, D. 2013. Using social media to engage citizens: A study of Italian municipalities. Public Relations Review, 39 (3): 232–234. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allers, M. A. 2013. “Decentralization with National Standards. The Case of the Netherlands.” In Balance between Decentralization and Merit, edited by J. Kim, J. Lotz, and N. Jørgenmau, 119–130, Copenhagen, Denmark: Korea Institute of Public Finance and the Danish Ministry for Economic Affairs and the Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Arceneaux, P. C., and L. F. Dinu. 2018. “The Social Mediated Age of Information: Twitter and Instagram as Tools for Information Dissemination in Higher Education.” New Media & Society 20 (11): 4155–4176. doi:10.1177/1461444818768259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertot, J. C., P. T. Jaeger, and D. Hansen. 2012. “The Impact of Policies on Government Social Media Usage: Issues, Challenges, and Recommendations.” Government Information Quarterly 29: 30–40. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., , et al, et al. 2012. “Local E-Government 2.0: Social Media and Corporate Transparency in Municipalities.” Government Information Quarterly 29 (2): 123–132. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2011.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., D. Perea, and M. Bednárová. 2019. “Twitter as A Tool for Citizen Engagement: An Empirical Study of the Andalusian Municipalities.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (3): 480–489. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., and M. Bednárová. 2013. “Corporate LinkedIn Practices of Eurozone Companies.” Online Information Review 37 (6): 969–984. doi:10.1108/OIR-09-2012-0159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., and M. Ratkai. 2013. “A Set of Metrics to Assess Stakeholder Engagement and Social Legitimacy on A Corporate Facebook Page.” Online Information Review 37 (5): 787–803. doi:10.1108/OIR-03-2012-0054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., S. Royo, and M. Ratkai. 2015. “Citizens’ Engagement on Local Governments’ Facebook Sites. An Empirical Analysis: The Impact of Different Media and Content Types in Western Europe.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (1): 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonsón, E., S. Royo, and M. Ratkai. 2017. “Facebook Practices in Western European Municipalities: An Empirical Analysis of Activity and Citizens’ Engagement.” Administration and Society 49 (3): 320–347. doi:10.1177/0095399714544945.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bossetta, M. 2018. “The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 US Election.” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95 (2): 471–496. doi:10.1177/1077699018763307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryer, T. A., and S. M. Zavattaro. 2011. “Social Media and Public Administration.” Administrative Theory and Praxis 33 (3): 325–340. doi:10.2753/ATP1084-1806330301.
   Google Scholar
• Budding, T., Faber, B., & Gradus, R. 2018. Assessing electronic service delivery in municipalities: determinants and financial consequences of e-government implementation. Local Government Studies, 44(5): 697–718. doi:10.1080/03003930.2018.1473768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Council for Public Administration (Raad voor het Openbaar Bestuur) 2019. Beleidsvrijheid Geduid. Research Report. The Hague: Raad Voor Het Openbaar Bestuur, March.
   Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., and J. Villodre. 2021. “Delivering Public Services through Social Media in European Local Governments. An Interpretative Framework Using Semantic Algorithms.” Local Government Studies 47 (2): 253–275. doi:10.1080/03003930.2020.1729750.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Criado, J. I., R. Sandoval-Almazan, and J. R. Gil-Garcia. 2013. “Government Innovation through Social Media.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (4): 319–326. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DePaula, N., E. Dincelli, and T. M. Harrison. 2018. “Toward a Typology of Government Social Media Communication: Democratic Goals, Symbolic Acts and Self-Presentation.” Government Information Quarterly 35 (1): 98–108. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.10.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison, N., and M. Hardey. 2014. “Social Media and Local Government: Citizenship, Consumption and Democracy.” Local Government Studies 40 (1): 21–40. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.799066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltantawy, N., and J. B. Wiest. 2011. “The Arab Spring Social Media in the Egyptian Revolution: Reconsidering Resource Mobilization Theory.” International Journal of Communication 5: 1207–1224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, B., T. Budding, and R. Gradus. 2020. “Assessing Social Media Use in Dutch Municipalities: Political, Institutional, and Socio-Economic Determinants.” Government Information Quarterly 37 (3): 101484. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., E. Erdfelder, A. Buchner, and A. G. Lang. 2009. “Statistical Power Analyses Using G*Power 3.1: Tests for Correlation and Regression Analyses.” Behavior Research Methods 41 (4): 1149–1160. doi:10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gradus, R., and T. Budding. 2020. “Political and Institutional Explanations for Increasing Re-Municipalization.” Urban Affairs Review 56 (2): 538–564. doi:10.1177/1078087418787907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, M., and E. Avery. 2013. “Government Public Relations and Social Media: An Analysis of the Perceptions and Trends of Social Media Use at the Local Government Level.” Public Relations Journal 7 (4): 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Gruzd, A., J. Lannigan, and K. Quigley. 2018. “Examining Government Cross-Platform Engagement in Social Media: Instagram Vs Twitter and the Big Lift Project.” Government Information Quarterly 35 (4): 579–587. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gümüş, N. 2016. “Usage of Social Media in City Marketing: A Research on 30 Metropolitan Municipalities in Turkey.” EMAJ: Emerging Markets Journal 6 (2): 30–37. doi:10.5195/emaj.2016.114.
   Google Scholar
• Haro de Rosario, A., A. Sáez-Martín, and M. Del Carmen Caba-Pérez. 2018. “Using Social Media To Enhance Citizen Engagement With Local Government: Twitter Or Facebook?” New Media & Society 20 (1): 29–49. doi:10.1177/1461444816645652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, S., D. Beverungen, and M. Räckers. 2013. “What Makes Local Governments’ Online Communications Successful? Insights from a Multi-method Analysis of Facebook.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (4): 387–396. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hupe, P., & Hill, M. et al 2020. Discretion in the policy process. In: T. Evans, and P. Hupe (eds.), Discretion and the Quest for Controlled Freedom. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham, 237–258. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_16.
   Google Scholar
• Irvin, R. A., and J. Stansbury. 2004. “Citizen Participation in Decision Making: Is It Worth the Effort?” Public Administration Review 64 (1): 55–65. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6210.2004.00346.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K., and N. Spierings. 2016. Social Media, Parties, and Political Inequalities. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Jungherr, A. 2016. “Twitter Use in Election Campaigns: A Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13 (1): 72–91. doi:10.1080/19331681.2015.1132401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, A. M., and M. Haenlein. 2011. “The Early Bird Catches the News: Nine Things You Should Know about Micro-blogging.” Business Horizons 54 (2): 105–113. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lappas, G., A. Triantafillidou, and A. Kani 2021. “Harnessing the Power of Dialogue: Examining the Impact of Facebook Content on Citizens’ Engagement.” Local Government Studies: In press. doi: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1870958.
   Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. O. 2017. “Top Users and Long Tails: Twitter and Instagram Use during the 2015 Norwegian Elections.” Social Media + Society 3 (2): 1–12. doi:10.1177/2056305117713776.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D., and J. Radford. 2017. “Data Ex Machina: Introduction To Big Data.” Annual Review of Sociology 43 (1): 19–39. doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-060116-053457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lup, K., L. Trub, and L. Rosenthal. 2015. “Instagram #instasad?: Exploring Associations among Instagram Use, Depressive Symptoms, Negative Social Comparison, and Strangers Followed.” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18 (5): 247–252. doi:10.1089/cyber.2014.0560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marwick, A. E., and D. Boyd. 2011. “I Tweet Honestly, I Tweet Passionately: Twitter Users, Context Collapse, and the Imagined Audience.” New Media & Society 13 (1): 114–133. doi:10.1177/1461444810365313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medaglia, R., and L. Zheng. 2017. “Mapping Government Social Media Research and Moving It Forward: A Framework and A Research Agenda.” Government Information Quarterly 34 (3): 496–510. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellon, J., and C. Prosser. 2017. “Twitter and Facebook are Not Representative of the General Population: Political Attitudes and Demographics of British Social Media Users.” Research and Politics 4 (3): 1–9. doi:10.1177/2053168017720008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mergel, I., and B. Greeves. 2012. Social Media in the Public Sector Field Guide: Designing and Implementing Strategies and Policies. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Nah, S., and G. D. Saxton. 2013. “Modeling the Adoption and Use of Social Media by Nonprofit Organizations.” New Media & Society 15 (2): 294–313. doi:10.1177/1461444812452411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcom Research & Consultancy. 2019. “Sociale Media Onderzoek 2019.” Research Report. Amsterdam: Newcom Research & Consultancy. 29 January.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, G. H. M., and E. W. Welch. 2013. “Social Media Use in Local Government: Linkage of Technology, Task, and Organizational Context.” Government Information Quarterly 30 (4): 397–405. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paliszkiewicz, J., and M. Mądra-Sawicka. 2016. “Impression Management in Social Media: The Example of LinkedIn.” Management 11 (3): 203–212.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. 2009. “The Virtual Geographies of Social Networks: A Comparative Analysis of Facebook, LinkedIn, and ASmallWorld.” New Media & Society 11 (1/2): 199–220. doi:10.1177/1461444808099577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruano de La Fuente, J. 2014. “E-Government Strategies in Spanish Local Governments.” Local Government Studies 40 (4): 600–620. doi:10.1080/03003930.2013.787414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez Martín, A., A. Haro de Rosario, and M. Del Caba Pérez. 2015. “Using Twitter for Dialogic Communication: Local Government Strategies in the European Union.” Local Government Studies 41 (3): 421–444. doi:10.1080/03003930.2014.991866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. 2013. Institutions and Organizations. 4th ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, P., et al. 2019. “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly: Three Faces of Social Media Usage by Local Governments.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (3): 469–479. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2019.05.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Statistics Netherlands 2019. “Municipal Classification on 1 January 2019 (Gemeentelijke Indeling Op 1 Januari 2019).” Online: https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/onze-diensten/methoden/classificaties/overig/gemeentelijke-indelingen-per-jaar/indeling-per-jaar/gemeentelijke-indeling-op-1-januari-2019, last accessed 24 February 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Van Doorn, J., D. van Den Bergh, U. Böhm, F. Dablander, K. Derks, T. Draws, A. Etz, et al. 2021. “The JASP Guidelines for Conducting and Reporting a Bayesian Analysis.” Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 28 (3): 813–826. doi:10.3758/s13423-020-01798-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenmakers, E. J., R. D. Morey, and M. D. Lee. 2016. “Bayesian Benefits for the Pragmatic Researcher.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 25 (3): 169–176. doi:10.1177/0963721416643289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterloo, S. F., et al. 2018. “Norms of Online Expressions of Emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp.” New Media & Society 20 (5): 1813–1831. doi:10.1177/1461444817707349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wukich, C., and I. Mergel. 2016. “Reusing Social Media Information in Government.” Government Information Quarterly 33 (2): 305–312. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zavattaro, S. M., and A. J. Sementelli. 2014. “A Critical Examination of Social Media Adoption in Government: Introducing Omnipresence.” Government Information Quarterly 31 (2): 257–264. doi:10.1016/j.giq.2013.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, J. F. 1995. State-local Relations: A Partnership Approach. New York: Praeger.
   Google Scholar